From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"plagnioj@jcrosoft.com" <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
"kgene.kim@samsung.com" <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>"plagnioj@jcrosoft.com"
<plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [Suggestion] ARM:S5pv210: compiling issue for s5pv210 by using randconfig
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:13:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5174D4FA.70404@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130417100243.GV14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 2013年04月17日 18:02, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 05:25:34PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> CONFIG_CPU_ARM7TDMI=y
>> CONFIG_CPU_ARM9TDMI=y
>> CONFIG_CPU_V7=y
>> CONFIG_CPU_32v4T=y
>> CONFIG_CPU_32v6K=y
>> CONFIG_CPU_32v7=y
>
> This is an invalid configuration. A single kernel can not support ARMv7
> and ARMv4T simultaneously.
>
> The problem is caused by MMU=n, which exposes the CPU_ARM7TDMI and
> CPU_ARM9TDMI options, which in turn select 32v4T. This is in turn
> caused by the incomplete integration of uclinux.
>
> I think the only thing which can be done is to remove the ARM9TDMI
> support code, which doesn't seem to be used by anything, and adjust
> ARM7TDMI so that it isn't visible, but is selected by ARCH_AT91X40
> (which seems to be its only user.)
>
> Here's the slightly smaller version of that:
>
I apply your patch below.
and also let CONFIG_MMU=y in menuconfig (just Arnd suggested).
it passes compilation.
I prefer to let the patch below to integrate into next-tree.
if I should do it (e.g. need send the patch again in normal way), I
should try.
thanks.
gchen.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.non_dt b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.non_dt
> index 6c24985..dc972e1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.non_dt
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.non_dt
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91X40
> select ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET
> select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
> select SPARSE_IRQ
> + select CPU_ARM7TDMI
>
> endchoice
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
> index cb812a1..deb6c6a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ comment "Processor Type"
>
> # ARM7TDMI
> config CPU_ARM7TDMI
> - bool "Support ARM7TDMI processor"
> + bool
> depends on !MMU
> select CPU_32v4T
> select CPU_ABRT_LV4T
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ config CPU_ARM740T
>
> # ARM9TDMI
> config CPU_ARM9TDMI
> - bool "Support ARM9TDMI processor"
> + bool
> depends on !MMU
> select CPU_32v4T
> select CPU_ABRT_NOMMU
>
>
>
--
Chen Gang
Asianux Corporation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: gang.chen@asianux.com (Chen Gang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Suggestion] ARM:S5pv210: compiling issue for s5pv210 by using randconfig
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:13:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5174D4FA.70404@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130417100243.GV14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 2013?04?17? 18:02, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 05:25:34PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> CONFIG_CPU_ARM7TDMI=y
>> CONFIG_CPU_ARM9TDMI=y
>> CONFIG_CPU_V7=y
>> CONFIG_CPU_32v4T=y
>> CONFIG_CPU_32v6K=y
>> CONFIG_CPU_32v7=y
>
> This is an invalid configuration. A single kernel can not support ARMv7
> and ARMv4T simultaneously.
>
> The problem is caused by MMU=n, which exposes the CPU_ARM7TDMI and
> CPU_ARM9TDMI options, which in turn select 32v4T. This is in turn
> caused by the incomplete integration of uclinux.
>
> I think the only thing which can be done is to remove the ARM9TDMI
> support code, which doesn't seem to be used by anything, and adjust
> ARM7TDMI so that it isn't visible, but is selected by ARCH_AT91X40
> (which seems to be its only user.)
>
> Here's the slightly smaller version of that:
>
I apply your patch below.
and also let CONFIG_MMU=y in menuconfig (just Arnd suggested).
it passes compilation.
I prefer to let the patch below to integrate into next-tree.
if I should do it (e.g. need send the patch again in normal way), I
should try.
thanks.
gchen.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.non_dt b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.non_dt
> index 6c24985..dc972e1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.non_dt
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.non_dt
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91X40
> select ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET
> select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
> select SPARSE_IRQ
> + select CPU_ARM7TDMI
>
> endchoice
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
> index cb812a1..deb6c6a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ comment "Processor Type"
>
> # ARM7TDMI
> config CPU_ARM7TDMI
> - bool "Support ARM7TDMI processor"
> + bool
> depends on !MMU
> select CPU_32v4T
> select CPU_ABRT_LV4T
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ config CPU_ARM740T
>
> # ARM9TDMI
> config CPU_ARM9TDMI
> - bool "Support ARM9TDMI processor"
> + bool
> depends on !MMU
> select CPU_32v4T
> select CPU_ABRT_NOMMU
>
>
>
--
Chen Gang
Asianux Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-22 6:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-25 2:10 [Suggestion] ARM:S5pv210: compiling issue for s5pv210 by using randconfig Chen Gang
2013-03-25 2:10 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-03 9:46 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-03 9:46 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-03 10:10 ` Will Deacon
2013-04-03 10:10 ` Will Deacon
2013-04-03 10:29 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-03 10:29 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-17 9:25 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-17 9:25 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-17 10:01 ` Will Deacon
2013-04-17 10:01 ` Will Deacon
2013-04-17 10:11 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-17 10:11 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-17 10:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-17 10:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-17 11:02 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-04-17 11:02 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-04-19 11:56 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-19 11:56 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-17 11:07 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-17 11:07 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-17 10:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-17 10:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-17 10:17 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-17 10:17 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-22 6:13 ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-04-22 6:13 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-24 4:12 ` [PATCH] ARM: Kconfig: let ARM9TDMI and ARM7TDMI invisible Chen Gang
2013-04-24 4:12 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-24 4:16 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-24 4:16 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-24 4:20 ` [PATCH v2] " Chen Gang
2013-04-24 4:20 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-24 17:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-24 17:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-24 17:59 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-04-24 17:59 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-04-25 1:16 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-25 1:16 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-25 1:16 ` Chen Gang
2013-04-25 1:16 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5174D4FA.70404@asianux.com \
--to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.