From: vinayakm.list@gmail.com (vinayak)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm: add an option to disable bounce
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 23:48:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51757F0B.1090104@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130422174712.GS14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Monday 22 April 2013 11:17 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 08:53:00PM +0530, vinayakm.list at gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Vinayak Menon <vinayakm.list@gmail.com>
>>
>> There are times when HIGHMEM is enabled, but
>> we don't prefer CONFIG_BOUNCE to be enabled.
>> CONFIG_BOUNCE can reduce the block device
>> throughput, and this is not ideal for machines
>> where we don't gain much by enabling it. So
>> provide an option to deselect CONFIG_BOUNCE. The
>> observation was made while measuring eMMC throughput
>> using iozone on an ARM device with 1GB RAM.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Menon <vinayakm.list@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> mm/Kconfig | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
>> index 3bea74f..29f9736 100644
>> --- a/mm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
>> @@ -263,8 +263,14 @@ config ZONE_DMA_FLAG
>> default "1"
>>
>> config BOUNCE
>> + bool "Enable bounce buffers"
>> def_bool y
>> depends on BLOCK && MMU && (ZONE_DMA || HIGHMEM)
>
> I don't think this is correct. You shouldn't use "bool" with "def_bool".
> Sure, add the "bool", but also change "def_bool" to "default".
Yes. I will change it to "default" and this looks to be correct
even from the definition in kconfig-language.txt. But I see other
instances in mm/Kconfig, where bool and def_bool are used together. When
I had tested this patch with def_bool, it worked as expected.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: vinayak <vinayakm.list@gmail.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rientjes@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add an option to disable bounce
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 23:48:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51757F0B.1090104@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130422174712.GS14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Monday 22 April 2013 11:17 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 08:53:00PM +0530, vinayakm.list@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Vinayak Menon <vinayakm.list@gmail.com>
>>
>> There are times when HIGHMEM is enabled, but
>> we don't prefer CONFIG_BOUNCE to be enabled.
>> CONFIG_BOUNCE can reduce the block device
>> throughput, and this is not ideal for machines
>> where we don't gain much by enabling it. So
>> provide an option to deselect CONFIG_BOUNCE. The
>> observation was made while measuring eMMC throughput
>> using iozone on an ARM device with 1GB RAM.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Menon <vinayakm.list@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> mm/Kconfig | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
>> index 3bea74f..29f9736 100644
>> --- a/mm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
>> @@ -263,8 +263,14 @@ config ZONE_DMA_FLAG
>> default "1"
>>
>> config BOUNCE
>> + bool "Enable bounce buffers"
>> def_bool y
>> depends on BLOCK && MMU && (ZONE_DMA || HIGHMEM)
>
> I don't think this is correct. You shouldn't use "bool" with "def_bool".
> Sure, add the "bool", but also change "def_bool" to "default".
Yes. I will change it to "default" and this looks to be correct
even from the definition in kconfig-language.txt. But I see other
instances in mm/Kconfig, where bool and def_bool are used together. When
I had tested this patch with def_bool, it worked as expected.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: vinayak <vinayakm.list@gmail.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rientjes@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add an option to disable bounce
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 23:48:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51757F0B.1090104@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130422174712.GS14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Monday 22 April 2013 11:17 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 08:53:00PM +0530, vinayakm.list@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Vinayak Menon <vinayakm.list@gmail.com>
>>
>> There are times when HIGHMEM is enabled, but
>> we don't prefer CONFIG_BOUNCE to be enabled.
>> CONFIG_BOUNCE can reduce the block device
>> throughput, and this is not ideal for machines
>> where we don't gain much by enabling it. So
>> provide an option to deselect CONFIG_BOUNCE. The
>> observation was made while measuring eMMC throughput
>> using iozone on an ARM device with 1GB RAM.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Menon <vinayakm.list@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> mm/Kconfig | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
>> index 3bea74f..29f9736 100644
>> --- a/mm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
>> @@ -263,8 +263,14 @@ config ZONE_DMA_FLAG
>> default "1"
>>
>> config BOUNCE
>> + bool "Enable bounce buffers"
>> def_bool y
>> depends on BLOCK && MMU && (ZONE_DMA || HIGHMEM)
>
> I don't think this is correct. You shouldn't use "bool" with "def_bool".
> Sure, add the "bool", but also change "def_bool" to "default".
Yes. I will change it to "default" and this looks to be correct
even from the definition in kconfig-language.txt. But I see other
instances in mm/Kconfig, where bool and def_bool are used together. When
I had tested this patch with def_bool, it worked as expected.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-22 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-22 15:23 [PATCH] mm: add an option to disable bounce vinayakm.list at gmail.com
2013-04-22 15:23 ` vinayakm.list
2013-04-22 15:23 ` vinayakm.list
2013-04-22 16:58 ` Randy Dunlap
2013-04-22 16:58 ` Randy Dunlap
2013-04-22 16:58 ` Randy Dunlap
2013-04-22 17:37 ` vinayak
2013-04-22 17:37 ` vinayak
2013-04-22 17:37 ` vinayak
2013-04-22 17:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-22 17:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-22 17:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-22 18:18 ` vinayak [this message]
2013-04-22 18:18 ` vinayak
2013-04-22 18:18 ` vinayak
2013-04-29 20:46 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-29 20:46 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-29 20:46 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51757F0B.1090104@gmail.com \
--to=vinayakm.list@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.