From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Matthew Garrett
<matthew.garrett-05XSO3Yj/JvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: Check EFI revision in setup_efi_vars
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:44:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5177EFCE.80104@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130424143738.GB15272-dHPIJuKSOV01V+h/cAXI7w8O6CCKKCg3HZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
On 24/04/13 15:37, Josh Boyer wrote:
> We need to check the runtime sys_table for the EFI version the firmware
> specifies instead of just checking for a NULL QueryVariableInfo. Older
> implementations of EFI don't have QueryVariableInfo but the runtime is
> a smaller structure, so the pointer to it may be pointing off into garbage.
>
> This is apparently the case with several Apple firmwares that support EFI
> 1.10, and the current check causes them to no longer boot. Fix based on
> a suggestion from Matthew Garrett.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
> index 8615f75..b46efbf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
> @@ -258,7 +258,9 @@ static efi_status_t setup_efi_vars(struct boot_params *params)
> u64 store_size, remaining_size, var_size;
> efi_status_t status;
>
> - if (!sys_table->runtime->query_variable_info)
> + if (sys_table->runtime->hdr.revision < EFI_2_00_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION)
> + return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
> + else if(!sys_table->runtime->query_variable_info)
> return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
>
> data = (struct setup_data *)(unsigned long)params->hdr.setup_data;
>
Thanks Josh, that looks correct.
It's a small point, but does the check against NULL actually make sense?
I don't think we ever check other system table pointers against NULL.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: Check EFI revision in setup_efi_vars
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:44:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5177EFCE.80104@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130424143738.GB15272@hansolo.jdub.homelinux.org>
On 24/04/13 15:37, Josh Boyer wrote:
> We need to check the runtime sys_table for the EFI version the firmware
> specifies instead of just checking for a NULL QueryVariableInfo. Older
> implementations of EFI don't have QueryVariableInfo but the runtime is
> a smaller structure, so the pointer to it may be pointing off into garbage.
>
> This is apparently the case with several Apple firmwares that support EFI
> 1.10, and the current check causes them to no longer boot. Fix based on
> a suggestion from Matthew Garrett.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
> index 8615f75..b46efbf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
> @@ -258,7 +258,9 @@ static efi_status_t setup_efi_vars(struct boot_params *params)
> u64 store_size, remaining_size, var_size;
> efi_status_t status;
>
> - if (!sys_table->runtime->query_variable_info)
> + if (sys_table->runtime->hdr.revision < EFI_2_00_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION)
> + return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
> + else if(!sys_table->runtime->query_variable_info)
> return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
>
> data = (struct setup_data *)(unsigned long)params->hdr.setup_data;
>
Thanks Josh, that looks correct.
It's a small point, but does the check against NULL actually make sense?
I don't think we ever check other system table pointers against NULL.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-24 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-24 14:37 [PATCH] efi: Check EFI revision in setup_efi_vars Josh Boyer
2013-04-24 14:37 ` Josh Boyer
[not found] ` <20130424143738.GB15272-dHPIJuKSOV01V+h/cAXI7w8O6CCKKCg3HZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-24 14:44 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2013-04-24 14:44 ` Matt Fleming
2013-04-24 14:54 ` Josh Boyer
[not found] ` <20130424145449.GC15272-dHPIJuKSOV01V+h/cAXI7w8O6CCKKCg3HZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-24 14:57 ` Matt Fleming
2013-04-24 14:57 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <5177F2C3.5080907-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-24 15:01 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-04-24 15:01 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-04-24 15:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Josh Boyer
2013-04-24 15:16 ` Josh Boyer
2013-04-24 15:20 ` Matt Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5177EFCE.80104@intel.com \
--to=matt.fleming-ral2jqcrhueavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jwboyer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=matthew.garrett-05XSO3Yj/JvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.