Re: Evaluating the c_can driver for EG20T

[Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>]

On 04/25/2013 09:43 AM, j.p.lammertink wrote:
> 
> Hi Wolfgang,
>  
> < Hi Jeroen,
> <> On 04/24/2013 11:11 AM, j.p.lammertink wrote:
> <> Hi Wolfgang,
>  
> <> I think I have a patch for the "Loosing CAN messages problem"
> <> See at the bottom Appendix 7 Sugested patch.
> <> I realize that this patch has a performance penalty, but I didn't dare
> <> to make more rigorous changes.
> <> I've put the patch on top of Patch 1, of the patches that you sugested (see
> <> text below)
>  
> <> I'm interested in all feedback.
> < Well, we want to get rid of the pch_can driver sooner than later.
> < Therefore I would appreciate if you could test and improve the c_can
> < driver instead.
> < Wolfgang.
> 
> I tried once before but I did not succeed. I probably did something
> wrong. Can you tell me how I can replace the pch_can driver by the 
> c_can driver?
> We have reduced confidence in the pch_can driver and therefor we
> are also intrested in evaluating the c_can driver.

Good, anyway, could you sent me your patches pch_can.c to understand
better your lates problems.

> Note, after applying patch 1/7 to the pch_can driver, I also attemped to
> apply the patches 2/7-7/7 which mainly/only(?) effect the c_can driver.
> 1/7 went succesfull, 2/7-7/7 not. Do I still need to apply those patches?

What exact kernel disto and kernel version are you using. With that
knowledge I could provid new patches.

Wolfgang.