From: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
To: Phil Pishioneri <pgp@psu.edu>
Cc: Wendy Cheng <s.wendy.cheng@gmail.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Yan Burman <yanb@mellanox.com>,
"Atchley, Scott" <atchleyes@ornl.gov>,
Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: NFS over RDMA benchmark
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:14:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51798E97.1000200@talpey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51797D8D.1080302@psu.edu>
On 4/25/2013 3:01 PM, Phil Pishioneri wrote:
> On 4/25/13 1:18 PM, Wendy Cheng wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com> wrote:
>>> 1)
>>>
>>> The client slot count is not hard-coded, it can easily be changed by
>>> writing a value to /proc and initiating a new mount. But I doubt that
>>> increasing the slot table will improve performance much, unless this is
>>> a small-random-read, and spindle-limited workload.
>> It was a shot in the dark :) .. as our test bed has not been setup
>> yet .However, since I'll be working on (very) slow clients, increasing
>> this buffer is still interesting (to me). I don't see where it is
>> controlled by a /proc value (?) - but that is not a concern at this
>> moment as /proc entry is easy to add. More questions on the server
>> though (see below) ...
>
> Might there be confusion between the RDMA slot table and the TCP/UDP
> ones (which have proc entries under /proc/sys/sunrpc)?
>
No, the xprtrdma.ko creates similar slot table controls when it loads.
See the names below, prefixed with "rdma":
> tmt@Home:~$ ls /proc/sys/sunrpc
> max_resvport nfsd_debug nlm_debug tcp_fin_timeout tcp_slot_table_entries udp_slot_table_entries
> min_resvport nfs_debug rpc_debug tcp_max_slot_table_entries transports
> tmt@Home:~$ sudo insmod xprtrdma
> tmt@Home:~$ ls /proc/sys/sunrpc
> max_resvport nlm_debug rdma_memreg_strategy tcp_fin_timeout udp_slot_table_entries
> min_resvport rdma_inline_write_padding rdma_pad_optimize tcp_max_slot_table_entries
> nfsd_debug rdma_max_inline_read rdma_slot_table_entries tcp_slot_table_entries
> nfs_debug rdma_max_inline_write rpc_debug transports
> tmt@Home:~$
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Talpey <tom-CLs1Zie5N5HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Phil Pishioneri <pgp-8DAjSxpRXgY@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Wendy Cheng
<s.wendy.cheng-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields"
<bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Yan Burman <yanb-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
"Atchley, Scott" <atchleyes-1Heg1YXhbW8@public.gmane.org>,
Tom Tucker
<tom-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: NFS over RDMA benchmark
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:14:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51798E97.1000200@talpey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51797D8D.1080302-8DAjSxpRXgY@public.gmane.org>
On 4/25/2013 3:01 PM, Phil Pishioneri wrote:
> On 4/25/13 1:18 PM, Wendy Cheng wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Tom Talpey <tom-CLs1Zie5N5HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> 1)
>>>
>>> The client slot count is not hard-coded, it can easily be changed by
>>> writing a value to /proc and initiating a new mount. But I doubt that
>>> increasing the slot table will improve performance much, unless this is
>>> a small-random-read, and spindle-limited workload.
>> It was a shot in the dark :) .. as our test bed has not been setup
>> yet .However, since I'll be working on (very) slow clients, increasing
>> this buffer is still interesting (to me). I don't see where it is
>> controlled by a /proc value (?) - but that is not a concern at this
>> moment as /proc entry is easy to add. More questions on the server
>> though (see below) ...
>
> Might there be confusion between the RDMA slot table and the TCP/UDP
> ones (which have proc entries under /proc/sys/sunrpc)?
>
No, the xprtrdma.ko creates similar slot table controls when it loads.
See the names below, prefixed with "rdma":
> tmt@Home:~$ ls /proc/sys/sunrpc
> max_resvport nfsd_debug nlm_debug tcp_fin_timeout tcp_slot_table_entries udp_slot_table_entries
> min_resvport nfs_debug rpc_debug tcp_max_slot_table_entries transports
> tmt@Home:~$ sudo insmod xprtrdma
> tmt@Home:~$ ls /proc/sys/sunrpc
> max_resvport nlm_debug rdma_memreg_strategy tcp_fin_timeout udp_slot_table_entries
> min_resvport rdma_inline_write_padding rdma_pad_optimize tcp_max_slot_table_entries
> nfsd_debug rdma_max_inline_read rdma_slot_table_entries tcp_slot_table_entries
> nfs_debug rdma_max_inline_write rpc_debug transports
> tmt@Home:~$
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-25 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-17 14:36 NFS over RDMA benchmark Yan Burman
2013-04-17 14:36 ` Yan Burman
2013-04-17 17:15 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-17 17:15 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-17 17:32 ` Atchley, Scott
2013-04-17 17:32 ` Atchley, Scott
2013-04-17 18:06 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-17 18:06 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-18 12:47 ` Yan Burman
2013-04-18 12:47 ` Yan Burman
2013-04-18 16:16 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-18 16:16 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-23 21:06 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-23 21:06 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-24 12:35 ` Yan Burman
2013-04-24 12:35 ` Yan Burman
2013-04-24 15:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-24 15:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-24 15:26 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-24 15:26 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-24 16:27 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-24 16:27 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-24 18:04 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-24 18:04 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-24 18:26 ` Tom Talpey
2013-04-24 18:26 ` Tom Talpey
2013-04-25 17:18 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-25 17:18 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-25 19:01 ` Phil Pishioneri
2013-04-25 19:01 ` Phil Pishioneri
2013-04-25 20:14 ` Tom Talpey [this message]
2013-04-25 20:14 ` Tom Talpey
2013-04-25 20:04 ` Tom Talpey
2013-04-25 20:04 ` Tom Talpey
2013-04-25 21:17 ` Tom Tucker
2013-04-25 21:17 ` Tom Tucker
2013-04-25 21:58 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-25 21:58 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-25 22:26 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-25 22:26 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-28 6:28 ` Yan Burman
2013-04-28 6:28 ` Yan Burman
2013-04-28 14:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-28 14:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-29 5:34 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-29 5:34 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-29 12:16 ` Yan Burman
2013-04-29 12:16 ` Yan Burman
2013-04-29 13:05 ` Tom Tucker
2013-04-29 13:05 ` Tom Tucker
2013-04-29 13:07 ` Tom Tucker
2013-04-29 13:07 ` Tom Tucker
2013-04-30 5:09 ` Yan Burman
2013-04-30 5:09 ` Yan Burman
2013-04-30 13:05 ` Tom Talpey
2013-04-30 13:05 ` Tom Talpey
2013-04-30 14:23 ` Yan Burman
2013-04-30 14:23 ` Yan Burman
2013-04-30 14:44 ` Tom Talpey
2013-04-30 14:44 ` Tom Talpey
2013-04-30 14:20 ` Tom Talpey
2013-04-30 14:20 ` Tom Talpey
2013-04-30 14:38 ` Yan Burman
2013-04-30 14:38 ` Yan Burman
2013-04-30 18:58 ` Tom Tucker
2013-04-30 18:58 ` Tom Tucker
[not found] ` <CALsNU1MsjH5=p4Wtj2aJ5+odC7y7-5oTGhrzOL-=15pXaYYUZw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CABgxfbFhZTBO81WC5BcRRfQB_YBjE4N=sfS+G9eAzaFHYC_dWw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-20 14:56 ` Or Gerlitz
2013-06-20 14:56 ` Or Gerlitz
2013-04-30 16:24 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-30 16:24 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-30 13:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-30 13:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-19 2:27 ` Peng Tao
2013-04-19 2:27 ` Peng Tao
2013-04-22 11:07 ` Yan Burman
2013-04-22 11:07 ` Yan Burman
[not found] <51703280.03e9440a.06a6.3f9f@mx.google.com>
2013-04-18 19:15 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-18 19:15 ` Wendy Cheng
2013-04-19 1:03 ` Atchley, Scott
2013-04-19 1:03 ` Atchley, Scott
2013-04-19 3:35 ` Spencer
2013-04-19 3:35 ` Spencer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51798E97.1000200@talpey.com \
--to=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=atchleyes@ornl.gov \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=pgp@psu.edu \
--cc=s.wendy.cheng@gmail.com \
--cc=tom@opengridcomputing.com \
--cc=yanb@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.