All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Huck <will.huckk@gmail.com>
To: Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@redhat.com>, hpa@zytor.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
	oleg@redhat.com, kamaleshb@in.ibm.com, hechjie@cn.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: add phys addr validity check for /dev/mem mmap
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:21:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <517A0ED8.6000404@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364905733-23937-1-git-send-email-fhrbata@redhat.com>

Hi Peter,
On 04/02/2013 08:28 PM, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> When CR4.PAE is set, the 64b PTE's are used(ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT is set for
> X86_64 || X86_PAE). According to [1] Chapter 4 Paging, some higher bits in 64b
> PTE are reserved and have to be set to zero. For example, for IA-32e and 4KB
> page [1] 4.5 IA-32e Paging: Table 4-19, bits 51-M(MAXPHYADDR) are reserved. So
> for a CPU with e.g. 48bit phys addr width, bits 51-48 have to be zero. If one of
> the reserved bits is set, [1] 4.7 Page-Fault Exceptions, the #PF is generated
> with RSVD error code.
>
> <quote>
> RSVD flag (bit 3).
> This flag is 1 if there is no valid translation for the linear address because a
> reserved bit was set in one of the paging-structure entries used to translate
> that address. (Because reserved bits are not checked in a paging-structure entry
> whose P flag is 0, bit 3 of the error code can be set only if bit 0 is also
> set.)
> </quote>
>
> In mmap_mem() the first check is valid_mmap_phys_addr_range(), but it always
> returns 1 on x86. So it's possible to use any pgoff we want and to set the PTE's
> reserved bits in remap_pfn_range(). Meaning there is a possibility to use mmap

In this case, remap_pfn_range() setup the map and reserved bits for mmio 
memory, so the mmio memory is already populated, why trigger #PF?

> on /dev/mem and cause system panic. It's probably not that serious, because
> access to /dev/mem is limited and the system has to have panic_on_oops set, but
> still I think we should check this and return error.
>
> This patch adds check for x86 when ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT is set, the same way
> as it is already done in e.g. ioremap. With this fix mmap returns -EINVAL if the
> requested phys addr is bigger then the supported phys addr width.
>
> [1] Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual, Volume 3A
>
> Signed-off-by: Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@redhat.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/include/asm/io.h |  4 ++++
>   arch/x86/mm/mmap.c        | 13 +++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/io.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/io.h
> index d8e8eef..39607c6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/io.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/io.h
> @@ -242,6 +242,10 @@ static inline void flush_write_buffers(void)
>   #endif
>   }
>   
> +#define ARCH_HAS_VALID_PHYS_ADDR_RANGE
> +extern int valid_phys_addr_range(phys_addr_t addr, size_t count);
> +extern int valid_mmap_phys_addr_range(unsigned long pfn, size_t count);
> +
>   #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>   
>   extern void native_io_delay(void);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
> index 845df68..92ec31c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
>   #include <linux/sched.h>
>   #include <asm/elf.h>
>   
> +#include "physaddr.h"
> +
>   struct __read_mostly va_alignment va_align = {
>   	.flags = -1,
>   };
> @@ -122,3 +124,14 @@ void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   		mm->unmap_area = arch_unmap_area_topdown;
>   	}
>   }
> +
> +int valid_phys_addr_range(phys_addr_t addr, size_t count)
> +{
> +	return addr + count <= __pa(high_memory);
> +}
> +
> +int valid_mmap_phys_addr_range(unsigned long pfn, size_t count)
> +{
> +	resource_size_t addr = (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) + count;
> +	return phys_addr_valid(addr);
> +}

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Huck <will.huckk@gmail.com>
To: Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@redhat.com>, hpa@zytor.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
	oleg@redhat.com, kamaleshb@in.ibm.com, hechjie@cn.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: add phys addr validity check for /dev/mem mmap
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:21:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <517A0ED8.6000404@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364905733-23937-1-git-send-email-fhrbata@redhat.com>

Hi Peter,
On 04/02/2013 08:28 PM, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> When CR4.PAE is set, the 64b PTE's are used(ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT is set for
> X86_64 || X86_PAE). According to [1] Chapter 4 Paging, some higher bits in 64b
> PTE are reserved and have to be set to zero. For example, for IA-32e and 4KB
> page [1] 4.5 IA-32e Paging: Table 4-19, bits 51-M(MAXPHYADDR) are reserved. So
> for a CPU with e.g. 48bit phys addr width, bits 51-48 have to be zero. If one of
> the reserved bits is set, [1] 4.7 Page-Fault Exceptions, the #PF is generated
> with RSVD error code.
>
> <quote>
> RSVD flag (bit 3).
> This flag is 1 if there is no valid translation for the linear address because a
> reserved bit was set in one of the paging-structure entries used to translate
> that address. (Because reserved bits are not checked in a paging-structure entry
> whose P flag is 0, bit 3 of the error code can be set only if bit 0 is also
> set.)
> </quote>
>
> In mmap_mem() the first check is valid_mmap_phys_addr_range(), but it always
> returns 1 on x86. So it's possible to use any pgoff we want and to set the PTE's
> reserved bits in remap_pfn_range(). Meaning there is a possibility to use mmap

In this case, remap_pfn_range() setup the map and reserved bits for mmio 
memory, so the mmio memory is already populated, why trigger #PF?

> on /dev/mem and cause system panic. It's probably not that serious, because
> access to /dev/mem is limited and the system has to have panic_on_oops set, but
> still I think we should check this and return error.
>
> This patch adds check for x86 when ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT is set, the same way
> as it is already done in e.g. ioremap. With this fix mmap returns -EINVAL if the
> requested phys addr is bigger then the supported phys addr width.
>
> [1] Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual, Volume 3A
>
> Signed-off-by: Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata@redhat.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/include/asm/io.h |  4 ++++
>   arch/x86/mm/mmap.c        | 13 +++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/io.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/io.h
> index d8e8eef..39607c6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/io.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/io.h
> @@ -242,6 +242,10 @@ static inline void flush_write_buffers(void)
>   #endif
>   }
>   
> +#define ARCH_HAS_VALID_PHYS_ADDR_RANGE
> +extern int valid_phys_addr_range(phys_addr_t addr, size_t count);
> +extern int valid_mmap_phys_addr_range(unsigned long pfn, size_t count);
> +
>   #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>   
>   extern void native_io_delay(void);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
> index 845df68..92ec31c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
>   #include <linux/sched.h>
>   #include <asm/elf.h>
>   
> +#include "physaddr.h"
> +
>   struct __read_mostly va_alignment va_align = {
>   	.flags = -1,
>   };
> @@ -122,3 +124,14 @@ void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   		mm->unmap_area = arch_unmap_area_topdown;
>   	}
>   }
> +
> +int valid_phys_addr_range(phys_addr_t addr, size_t count)
> +{
> +	return addr + count <= __pa(high_memory);
> +}
> +
> +int valid_mmap_phys_addr_range(unsigned long pfn, size_t count)
> +{
> +	resource_size_t addr = (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) + count;
> +	return phys_addr_valid(addr);
> +}


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-26  5:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-02 12:28 [PATCH] x86: add phys addr validity check for /dev/mem mmap Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-02 12:28 ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-02 18:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-02 18:02   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-02 18:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-02 18:48   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-02 19:10   ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-02 19:10     ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-02 20:29     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-02 20:29       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-02 20:52       ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-02 20:52         ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-24 11:36       ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-24 11:36         ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-04  1:11   ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-04  1:11     ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-04  1:13     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-04  1:13       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-04  1:17       ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-04  1:17         ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-04  1:32         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-04  1:32           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-04  1:53           ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-04  1:53             ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-04  2:14             ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-04  2:14               ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-04  2:17               ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-04  2:17                 ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-04  5:20           ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-04  5:20             ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-11  2:40       ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-11  2:40         ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-11  2:48         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-11  2:48           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-11  2:58           ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-11  2:58             ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-03  2:46 ` Cheng Jie He
2013-04-26  5:21 ` Will Huck [this message]
2013-04-26  5:21   ` Will Huck
2013-04-26 15:35   ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-26 15:35     ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-27  7:00     ` Will Huck
2013-04-27  7:00       ` Will Huck
2013-04-27 19:13       ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-27 19:13         ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-04-28  3:17         ` Will Huck
2013-04-28  3:17           ` Will Huck
2013-04-28  4:00           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-28  4:00             ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-28  8:03             ` Will Huck
2013-04-28  8:03               ` Will Huck
2013-05-01 18:19           ` Dave Hansen
2013-05-01 18:19             ` Dave Hansen
2013-05-01 19:04             ` Frantisek Hrbata
2013-05-01 19:04               ` Frantisek Hrbata

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=517A0ED8.6000404@gmail.com \
    --to=will.huckk@gmail.com \
    --cc=fhrbata@redhat.com \
    --cc=hechjie@cn.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kamaleshb@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.