From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/23] ARM: u300: device tree support for the timer
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:44:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <517A84A6.4090108@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbfDwhKA77aUbXhk5sZ0prxR-ic5dntCaAiNjKNBGo_wg@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/26/2013 08:38 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> On Monday 22 April 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>> + struct device_node *timer = NULL;
>>> +
>>> + timer = of_find_node_by_path("/timer0 at c0014000");
>>> + if (timer) {
>>> + struct resource irq_res;
>>> +
>>> + u300_timer_base = of_iomap(timer, 0);
>>> + /* Get the IRQ for the GP1 timer */
>>> + irq = of_irq_to_resource(timer, 2, &irq_res);
>>> + }
>>> +#endif
>>
>> Do you need the #ifdef? The functions should be defined in a way that
>> removes this code if CONFIG_OF is not defined.
>
> Actually not, this happens without CONFIG_OF:
>
> CC arch/arm/mach-u300/timer.o
> /home/elinwal/linux-stericsson/arch/arm/mach-u300/timer.c: In function
> 'u300_timer_init':
> /home/elinwal/linux-stericsson/arch/arm/mach-u300/timer.c:371:2:
> error: implicit declaration of function 'of_find_node_by_path'
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> /home/elinwal/linux-stericsson/arch/arm/mach-u300/timer.c:371:8:
> warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled
> by default]
> /home/elinwal/linux-stericsson/arch/arm/mach-u300/timer.c:377:3:
> error: implicit declaration of function 'of_irq_to_resource'
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> make[3]: *** [arch/arm/mach-u300/timer.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [arch/arm/mach-u300] Error 2
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>
> Maybe it's just a bug that these don't have the proper stubs in <linux/of.h>?
>
> Or is there a deeper idea behind this? (CC some OF ppl.)
Yes, you could add empty function, but searching by path is probably not
the right thing to do. Why not use clocksource_of_init? That's what all
the cool kids are doing now. Is there some special feature of the timer
at this address? If so, then add a property to describe that feature and
key off of that plus the compatible prop.
Rob
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> _______________________________________________
> devicetree-discuss mailing list
> devicetree-discuss at lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/23] ARM: u300: device tree support for the timer
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:44:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <517A84A6.4090108@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbfDwhKA77aUbXhk5sZ0prxR-ic5dntCaAiNjKNBGo_wg@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/26/2013 08:38 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> On Monday 22 April 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>> + struct device_node *timer = NULL;
>>> +
>>> + timer = of_find_node_by_path("/timer0@c0014000");
>>> + if (timer) {
>>> + struct resource irq_res;
>>> +
>>> + u300_timer_base = of_iomap(timer, 0);
>>> + /* Get the IRQ for the GP1 timer */
>>> + irq = of_irq_to_resource(timer, 2, &irq_res);
>>> + }
>>> +#endif
>>
>> Do you need the #ifdef? The functions should be defined in a way that
>> removes this code if CONFIG_OF is not defined.
>
> Actually not, this happens without CONFIG_OF:
>
> CC arch/arm/mach-u300/timer.o
> /home/elinwal/linux-stericsson/arch/arm/mach-u300/timer.c: In function
> 'u300_timer_init':
> /home/elinwal/linux-stericsson/arch/arm/mach-u300/timer.c:371:2:
> error: implicit declaration of function 'of_find_node_by_path'
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> /home/elinwal/linux-stericsson/arch/arm/mach-u300/timer.c:371:8:
> warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled
> by default]
> /home/elinwal/linux-stericsson/arch/arm/mach-u300/timer.c:377:3:
> error: implicit declaration of function 'of_irq_to_resource'
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> make[3]: *** [arch/arm/mach-u300/timer.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [arch/arm/mach-u300] Error 2
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>
> Maybe it's just a bug that these don't have the proper stubs in <linux/of.h>?
>
> Or is there a deeper idea behind this? (CC some OF ppl.)
Yes, you could add empty function, but searching by path is probably not
the right thing to do. Why not use clocksource_of_init? That's what all
the cool kids are doing now. Is there some special feature of the timer
at this address? If so, then add a property to describe that feature and
key off of that plus the compatible prop.
Rob
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> _______________________________________________
> devicetree-discuss mailing list
> devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-26 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-22 9:51 [PATCH 03/23] ARM: u300: device tree support for the timer Linus Walleij
2013-04-22 9:51 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-22 11:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-22 11:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-26 13:38 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-26 13:38 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-26 13:44 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2013-04-26 13:44 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=517A84A6.4090108@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.