From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 4/9] target-i386: Replace cpuid_*features fields with a feature word array
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 01:03:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51819F25.2090800@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366657220-776-5-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
Am 22.04.2013 21:00, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> This replaces the feature-bit fields on both X86CPU and x86_def_t
> structs with an array.
>
> With this, we will be able to simplify code that simply does the same
> operation on all feature words (e.g. kvm_check_features_against_host(),
> filter_features_for_kvm(), add_flagname_to_bitmaps(), CPU feature-bit
> property lookup/registration, and the proposed "feature-words" property)
>
> The following field replacements were made on X86CPU and x86_def_t:
>
> (cpuid_)features -> features[FEAT_1_EDX]
> (cpuid_)ext_features -> features[FEAT_1_ECX]
> (cpuid_)ext2_features -> features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX]
> (cpuid_)ext3_features -> features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX]
> (cpuid_)ext4_features -> features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX]
> (cpuid_)kvm_features -> features[FEAT_KVM]
> (cpuid_)svm_features -> features[FEAT_SVM]
> (cpuid_)7_0_ebx_features -> features[FEAT_7_0_EBX]
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-By: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
> index 73ae2ef..110ef98 100644
> --- a/target-i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
[...]
> @@ -1490,22 +1485,22 @@ static void cpu_x86_parse_featurestr(X86CPU *cpu, char *features, Error **errp)
> }
> featurestr = strtok(NULL, ",");
> }
> - env->cpuid_features |= plus_features[FEAT_1_EDX];
> - env->cpuid_ext_features |= plus_features[FEAT_1_ECX];
> - env->cpuid_ext2_features |= plus_features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX];
> - env->cpuid_ext3_features |= plus_features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX];
> - env->cpuid_ext4_features |= plus_features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX];
> - env->cpuid_kvm_features |= plus_features[FEAT_KVM];
> - env->cpuid_svm_features |= plus_features[FEAT_SVM];
> - env->cpuid_7_0_ebx_features |= plus_features[FEAT_7_0_EBX];
> - env->cpuid_features &= ~minus_features[FEAT_1_EDX];
> - env->cpuid_ext_features &= ~minus_features[FEAT_1_ECX];
> - env->cpuid_ext2_features &= ~minus_features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX];
> - env->cpuid_ext3_features &= ~minus_features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX];
> - env->cpuid_ext4_features &= ~minus_features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX];
> - env->cpuid_kvm_features &= ~minus_features[FEAT_KVM];
> - env->cpuid_svm_features &= ~minus_features[FEAT_SVM];
> - env->cpuid_7_0_ebx_features &= ~minus_features[FEAT_7_0_EBX];
> + env->features[FEAT_1_EDX] |= plus_features[FEAT_1_EDX];
> + env->features[FEAT_1_ECX] |= plus_features[FEAT_1_ECX];
> + env->features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX] |= plus_features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX];
> + env->features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX] |= plus_features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX];
> + env->features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX] |= plus_features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX];
> + env->features[FEAT_KVM] |= plus_features[FEAT_KVM];
> + env->features[FEAT_SVM] |= plus_features[FEAT_SVM];
> + env->features[FEAT_7_0_EBX] |= plus_features[FEAT_7_0_EBX];
> + env->features[FEAT_1_EDX] &= ~minus_features[FEAT_1_EDX];
> + env->features[FEAT_1_ECX] &= ~minus_features[FEAT_1_ECX];
> + env->features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX] &= ~minus_features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX];
> + env->features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX] &= ~minus_features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX];
> + env->features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX] &= ~minus_features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX];
> + env->features[FEAT_KVM] &= ~minus_features[FEAT_KVM];
> + env->features[FEAT_SVM] &= ~minus_features[FEAT_SVM];
> + env->features[FEAT_7_0_EBX] &= ~minus_features[FEAT_7_0_EBX];
>
> out:
> return;
Can this be done in a loop as a follow-up?
[...]
> @@ -1630,24 +1625,24 @@ static void cpu_x86_register(X86CPU *cpu, const char *name, Error **errp)
> }
>
> if (kvm_enabled()) {
> - def->kvm_features |= kvm_default_features;
> + def->features[FEAT_KVM] |= kvm_default_features;
> }
> - def->ext_features |= CPUID_EXT_HYPERVISOR;
> + def->features[FEAT_1_ECX] |= CPUID_EXT_HYPERVISOR;
>
> object_property_set_str(OBJECT(cpu), def->vendor, "vendor", errp);
> object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), def->level, "level", errp);
> object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), def->family, "family", errp);
> object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), def->model, "model", errp);
> object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), def->stepping, "stepping", errp);
> - env->cpuid_features = def->features;
> - env->cpuid_ext_features = def->ext_features;
> - env->cpuid_ext2_features = def->ext2_features;
> - env->cpuid_ext3_features = def->ext3_features;
> + env->features[FEAT_1_EDX] = def->features[FEAT_1_EDX];
> + env->features[FEAT_1_ECX] = def->features[FEAT_1_ECX];
> + env->features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX] = def->features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX];
> + env->features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX] = def->features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX];
> object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), def->xlevel, "xlevel", errp);
> - env->cpuid_kvm_features = def->kvm_features;
> - env->cpuid_svm_features = def->svm_features;
> - env->cpuid_ext4_features = def->ext4_features;
> - env->cpuid_7_0_ebx_features = def->cpuid_7_0_ebx_features;
> + env->features[FEAT_KVM] = def->features[FEAT_KVM];
> + env->features[FEAT_SVM] = def->features[FEAT_SVM];
> + env->features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX] = def->features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX];
> + env->features[FEAT_7_0_EBX] = def->features[FEAT_7_0_EBX];
> env->cpuid_xlevel2 = def->xlevel2;
>
> object_property_set_str(OBJECT(cpu), def->model_id, "model-id", errp);
[snip]
Dito?
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-01 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-22 19:00 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 0/9] x86: feature words array (v11) + "feature-words" property Eduardo Habkost
2013-04-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 1/9] target-i386: cleanup: Group together level, xlevel, xlevel2 fields Eduardo Habkost
2013-04-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 2/9] target-i386/kvm.c: Code formatting changes Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-01 22:55 ` Andreas Färber
2013-04-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 3/9] target-i386/cpu.c: Break lines so they don't get too long Eduardo Habkost
2013-04-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 4/9] target-i386: Replace cpuid_*features fields with a feature word array Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-01 23:03 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2013-05-02 15:06 ` Eduardo Habkost
2013-04-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 5/9] target-i386: Add ECX information to FeatureWordInfo Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-03 15:16 ` Andreas Färber
2013-05-03 15:54 ` Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-06 16:27 ` Andreas Färber
2013-04-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 6/9] target-i386: Add "feature-words" property Eduardo Habkost
2013-04-22 20:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " Eric Blake
2013-04-23 19:25 ` Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-03 11:34 ` [Qemu-devel] " Igor Mammedov
2013-05-03 13:17 ` Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-03 14:25 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-03 14:57 ` Eric Blake
2013-04-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 7/9] target-i386: Use FeatureWord loop on filter_features_for_kvm() Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-03 15:01 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-06 16:28 ` Andreas Färber
2013-04-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 8/9] target-i386: Introduce X86CPU.filtered_features field Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-03 15:03 ` Eric Blake
2013-04-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 9/9] target-i386: Add "filtered-features" property to X86CPU Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-03 15:10 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-01 22:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 0/9] x86: feature words array (v11) + "feature-words" property Andreas Färber
2013-05-02 19:43 ` Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-02 19:48 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-03 14:58 ` Andreas Färber
2013-05-03 15:23 ` Igor Mammedov
2013-05-03 15:31 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51819F25.2090800@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jdenemar@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.