All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: "Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging/iio/mxs-lradc: cleanup masklength
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 17:27:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5187D9FA.8000808@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6bb527db65fb20f60bb95814bff3abc513733a7c.1367671597.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>

On 05/04/2013 02:19 PM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> We know the exact iio->masklength = LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS.
> Let's use it consistently.
I guess this gives a small improvement in clarity so
applied to togreg branch of iio.git.

Thanks,
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c |    8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> index 2856b8f..03299ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mxs_lradc_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
>  		((LRADC_DELAY_TIMER_LOOP - 1) << LRADC_CH_NUM_SAMPLES_OFFSET);
>  	unsigned int i, j = 0;
>  
> -	for_each_set_bit(i, iio->active_scan_mask, iio->masklength) {
> +	for_each_set_bit(i, iio->active_scan_mask, LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS) {
>  		lradc->buffer[j] = readl(lradc->base + LRADC_CH(j));
>  		writel(chan_value, lradc->base + LRADC_CH(j));
>  		lradc->buffer[j] &= LRADC_CH_VALUE_MASK;
> @@ -775,8 +775,7 @@ static bool mxs_lradc_validate_scan_mask(struct iio_dev *iio,
>  					const unsigned long *mask)
>  {
>  	struct mxs_lradc *lradc = iio_priv(iio);
> -	const int len = iio->masklength;
> -	const int map_chans = bitmap_weight(mask, len);
> +	const int map_chans = bitmap_weight(mask, LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS);
>  	int rsvd_chans = 0;
>  	unsigned long rsvd_mask = 0;
>  
> @@ -793,7 +792,7 @@ static bool mxs_lradc_validate_scan_mask(struct iio_dev *iio,
>  		rsvd_chans++;
>  
>  	/* Test for attempts to map channels with special mode of operation. */
> -	if (bitmap_intersects(mask, &rsvd_mask, len))
> +	if (bitmap_intersects(mask, &rsvd_mask, LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS))
>  		return false;
>  
>  	/* Test for attempts to map more channels then available slots. */
> @@ -969,6 +968,7 @@ static int mxs_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	iio->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
>  	iio->channels = mxs_lradc_chan_spec;
>  	iio->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(mxs_lradc_chan_spec);
> +	iio->masklength = LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS;
>  
>  	ret = iio_triggered_buffer_setup(iio, &iio_pollfunc_store_time,
>  				&mxs_lradc_trigger_handler,
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jic23@kernel.org (Jonathan Cameron)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] staging/iio/mxs-lradc: cleanup masklength
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 17:27:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5187D9FA.8000808@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6bb527db65fb20f60bb95814bff3abc513733a7c.1367671597.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>

On 05/04/2013 02:19 PM, Micha? Miros?aw wrote:
> We know the exact iio->masklength = LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS.
> Let's use it consistently.
I guess this gives a small improvement in clarity so
applied to togreg branch of iio.git.

Thanks,
> 
> Signed-off-by: Micha? Miros?aw <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c |    8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> index 2856b8f..03299ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mxs_lradc_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
>  		((LRADC_DELAY_TIMER_LOOP - 1) << LRADC_CH_NUM_SAMPLES_OFFSET);
>  	unsigned int i, j = 0;
>  
> -	for_each_set_bit(i, iio->active_scan_mask, iio->masklength) {
> +	for_each_set_bit(i, iio->active_scan_mask, LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS) {
>  		lradc->buffer[j] = readl(lradc->base + LRADC_CH(j));
>  		writel(chan_value, lradc->base + LRADC_CH(j));
>  		lradc->buffer[j] &= LRADC_CH_VALUE_MASK;
> @@ -775,8 +775,7 @@ static bool mxs_lradc_validate_scan_mask(struct iio_dev *iio,
>  					const unsigned long *mask)
>  {
>  	struct mxs_lradc *lradc = iio_priv(iio);
> -	const int len = iio->masklength;
> -	const int map_chans = bitmap_weight(mask, len);
> +	const int map_chans = bitmap_weight(mask, LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS);
>  	int rsvd_chans = 0;
>  	unsigned long rsvd_mask = 0;
>  
> @@ -793,7 +792,7 @@ static bool mxs_lradc_validate_scan_mask(struct iio_dev *iio,
>  		rsvd_chans++;
>  
>  	/* Test for attempts to map channels with special mode of operation. */
> -	if (bitmap_intersects(mask, &rsvd_mask, len))
> +	if (bitmap_intersects(mask, &rsvd_mask, LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS))
>  		return false;
>  
>  	/* Test for attempts to map more channels then available slots. */
> @@ -969,6 +968,7 @@ static int mxs_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	iio->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
>  	iio->channels = mxs_lradc_chan_spec;
>  	iio->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(mxs_lradc_chan_spec);
> +	iio->masklength = LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS;
>  
>  	ret = iio_triggered_buffer_setup(iio, &iio_pollfunc_store_time,
>  				&mxs_lradc_trigger_handler,
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-05-06 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-04 13:19 [PATCH 1/2] staging/iio/mxs-lradc: cleanup masklength Michał Mirosław
2013-05-04 13:19 ` Michał Mirosław
2013-05-04 13:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging/iio/mxs-lradc: fix preenable for multiple buffers Michał Mirosław
2013-05-04 13:19   ` Michał Mirosław
2013-05-06 16:30   ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-05-06 16:30     ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-05-06 16:27 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2013-05-06 16:27   ` [PATCH 1/2] staging/iio/mxs-lradc: cleanup masklength Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5187D9FA.8000808@kernel.org \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.