From: s-anna@ti.com (Suman Anna)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 0/4] mailbox: Common API
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 19:02:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <518844A4.8040203@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367824946-6160-1-git-send-email-jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
Hi Jassi,
On 05/06/2013 02:22 AM, Jassi Brar wrote:
> Hello,
> I have made the implementation look more proper. Also made some changes
> suggested by Suman. Changes since V1:
>
> * Delete timer upon mailbox release
> * Filled in the stub ipc_links_unregister()
> * Check kzalloc return for errors.
> * Add the controller driver for OMAP2 class. I have taken the patch
> for mailbox's hwmod from Suman's. The clients are yet to be converted
> but this should be enough to convey the idea that the API could
> work for OMAP as well. If I had access to STE documentation, I might
> have done some implementation for U8500 as well.
The bug fixes in this series look good in general. I have provided my
design comments in the previous RFC thread [1] still, since the overall
changes here are not that much different from the RFC.
Thanks for prototyping the OMAP portions, it demonstrates the adaptation
to the new API, but I have to take a step approach in moving the current
OMAP mailbox code and making incremental changes on top of it. The
mailbox driver is the bottom-most layer in our IPC stacks, so changes at
this layer are very critical to the functional behavior.
regards
Suman
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org/msg429678.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
To: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
Cc: <loic.pallardy@st.com>, <arnd@arndb.de>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] mailbox: Common API
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 19:02:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <518844A4.8040203@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367824946-6160-1-git-send-email-jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
Hi Jassi,
On 05/06/2013 02:22 AM, Jassi Brar wrote:
> Hello,
> I have made the implementation look more proper. Also made some changes
> suggested by Suman. Changes since V1:
>
> * Delete timer upon mailbox release
> * Filled in the stub ipc_links_unregister()
> * Check kzalloc return for errors.
> * Add the controller driver for OMAP2 class. I have taken the patch
> for mailbox's hwmod from Suman's. The clients are yet to be converted
> but this should be enough to convey the idea that the API could
> work for OMAP as well. If I had access to STE documentation, I might
> have done some implementation for U8500 as well.
The bug fixes in this series look good in general. I have provided my
design comments in the previous RFC thread [1] still, since the overall
changes here are not that much different from the RFC.
Thanks for prototyping the OMAP portions, it demonstrates the adaptation
to the new API, but I have to take a step approach in moving the current
OMAP mailbox code and making incremental changes on top of it. The
mailbox driver is the bottom-most layer in our IPC stacks, so changes at
this layer are very critical to the functional behavior.
regards
Suman
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg429678.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-07 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-06 7:22 [PATCHv2 0/4] mailbox: Common API Jassi Brar
2013-05-06 7:22 ` Jassi Brar
2013-05-06 7:23 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] mailbox: rename pl320-ipc specific mailbox.h Jassi Brar
2013-05-06 7:23 ` Jassi Brar
2013-05-06 7:24 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] mailbox: Introduce a new common API Jassi Brar
2013-05-06 7:24 ` Jassi Brar
2013-05-09 16:31 ` Suman Anna
2013-05-09 16:31 ` Suman Anna
2013-05-09 16:41 ` Jassi Brar
2013-05-09 16:41 ` Jassi Brar
2013-05-09 16:40 ` Suman Anna
2013-05-09 16:40 ` Suman Anna
2013-05-09 17:48 ` Jassi Brar
2013-05-09 17:48 ` Jassi Brar
2013-05-09 18:05 ` Suman Anna
2013-05-09 18:05 ` Suman Anna
2013-05-09 18:49 ` Jassi Brar
2013-05-09 18:49 ` Jassi Brar
2013-05-09 23:43 ` Suman Anna
2013-05-09 23:43 ` Suman Anna
2013-05-13 19:09 ` Loic PALLARDY
2013-05-06 7:24 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] mailbox: pl320: Introduce common API driver Jassi Brar
2013-05-06 7:24 ` Jassi Brar
2013-05-07 1:58 ` Rob Herring
2013-05-07 1:58 ` Rob Herring
2013-05-07 16:56 ` Jassi Brar
2013-05-07 16:56 ` Jassi Brar
2013-05-06 7:24 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] mailbox: omap2: " Jassi Brar
2013-05-06 7:24 ` Jassi Brar
2013-05-07 0:02 ` Suman Anna [this message]
2013-05-07 0:02 ` [PATCHv2 0/4] mailbox: Common API Suman Anna
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=518844A4.8040203@ti.com \
--to=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.