All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tiejun.chen" <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: agraf@suse.de, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][KVM][PATCH 1/1] kvm:ppc:booke-64: soft-disable interrupts
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 01:56:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51885F49.6060605@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367884257.3398.9@snotra>

On 05/07/2013 07:50 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 05/05/2013 10:13:17 PM, tiejun.chen wrote:
>> On 05/06/2013 11:10 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote:
>>> For the external interrupt, the decrementer exception and the doorbell
>>> excpetion, we also need to soft-disable interrupts while doing as host
>>> interrupt handlers since the DO_KVM hook is always performed to skip
>>> EXCEPTION_COMMON then miss this original chance with the 'ints' (INTS_DISABLE).
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/241344/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/241412/
>
> :-)

I'm observing the same behaviour as well:

	WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());

>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/powerpc/kvm/bookehv_interrupts.S |    9 +++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/bookehv_interrupts.S
>>> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/bookehv_interrupts.S
>>> index e8ed7d6..2fd62bf 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/bookehv_interrupts.S
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/bookehv_interrupts.S
>>> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
>>>
>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>>>   #include <asm/exception-64e.h>
>>> +#include <asm/hw_irq.h>
>>> +#include <asm/irqflags.h>
>>>   #else
>>>   #include "../kernel/head_booke.h" /* for THREAD_NORMSAVE() */
>>>   #endif
>>> @@ -469,6 +471,13 @@ _GLOBAL(kvmppc_resume_host)
>>>       PPC_LL    r3, HOST_RUN(r1)
>>>       mr    r5, r14 /* intno */
>>>       mr    r14, r4 /* Save vcpu pointer. */
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>>> +    /* Should we soft-disable interrupts? */
>>> +    andi.    r6, r5, BOOKE_INTERRUPT_EXTERNAL | BOOKE_INTERRUPT_DECREMENTER
>>> | BOOKE_INTERRUPT_DOORBELL
>>> +    beq    skip_soft_dis
>>> +    SOFT_DISABLE_INTS(r7,r8)
>>> +skip_soft_dis:
>>> +#endif
>
> Why wouldn't we always disable them?  kvmppc_handle_exit() will enable
> interrupts when it's ready.

This only disable soft interrupt for kvmppc_restart_interrupt() that restarts 
interrupts if they were meant for the host:

a. SOFT_DISABLE_INTS() only for BOOKE_INTERRUPT_EXTERNAL | 
BOOKE_INTERRUPT_DECREMENTER | BOOKE_INTERRUPT_DOORBELL

b. bl      kvmppc_handle_exit

c. kvmppc_handle_exit()
{
         int r = RESUME_HOST;
         int s;

         /* update before a new last_exit_type is rewritten */
         kvmppc_update_timing_stats(vcpu);

         /* restart interrupts if they were meant for the host */
         kvmppc_restart_interrupt(vcpu, exit_nr);

         local_irq_enable();	=> Enable again.
....

And shouldn't we handle kvmppc_restart_interrupt() like the original HOST flow?

#define MASKABLE_EXCEPTION(trapnum, intnum, label, hdlr, ack)           \
         START_EXCEPTION(label);                                         \
         NORMAL_EXCEPTION_PROLOG(trapnum, intnum, PROLOG_ADDITION_MASKABLE)\
         EXCEPTION_COMMON(trapnum, PACA_EXGEN, *INTS_DISABLE*)             \
	...

So I think this should be reasonable :)

Tiejun


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "tiejun.chen" <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, agraf@suse.de,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][KVM][PATCH 1/1] kvm:ppc:booke-64: soft-disable interrupts
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 09:56:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51885F49.6060605@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367884257.3398.9@snotra>

On 05/07/2013 07:50 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 05/05/2013 10:13:17 PM, tiejun.chen wrote:
>> On 05/06/2013 11:10 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote:
>>> For the external interrupt, the decrementer exception and the doorbell
>>> excpetion, we also need to soft-disable interrupts while doing as host
>>> interrupt handlers since the DO_KVM hook is always performed to skip
>>> EXCEPTION_COMMON then miss this original chance with the 'ints' (INTS_DISABLE).
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/241344/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/241412/
>
> :-)

I'm observing the same behaviour as well:

	WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());

>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/powerpc/kvm/bookehv_interrupts.S |    9 +++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/bookehv_interrupts.S
>>> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/bookehv_interrupts.S
>>> index e8ed7d6..2fd62bf 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/bookehv_interrupts.S
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/bookehv_interrupts.S
>>> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
>>>
>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>>>   #include <asm/exception-64e.h>
>>> +#include <asm/hw_irq.h>
>>> +#include <asm/irqflags.h>
>>>   #else
>>>   #include "../kernel/head_booke.h" /* for THREAD_NORMSAVE() */
>>>   #endif
>>> @@ -469,6 +471,13 @@ _GLOBAL(kvmppc_resume_host)
>>>       PPC_LL    r3, HOST_RUN(r1)
>>>       mr    r5, r14 /* intno */
>>>       mr    r14, r4 /* Save vcpu pointer. */
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>>> +    /* Should we soft-disable interrupts? */
>>> +    andi.    r6, r5, BOOKE_INTERRUPT_EXTERNAL | BOOKE_INTERRUPT_DECREMENTER
>>> | BOOKE_INTERRUPT_DOORBELL
>>> +    beq    skip_soft_dis
>>> +    SOFT_DISABLE_INTS(r7,r8)
>>> +skip_soft_dis:
>>> +#endif
>
> Why wouldn't we always disable them?  kvmppc_handle_exit() will enable
> interrupts when it's ready.

This only disable soft interrupt for kvmppc_restart_interrupt() that restarts 
interrupts if they were meant for the host:

a. SOFT_DISABLE_INTS() only for BOOKE_INTERRUPT_EXTERNAL | 
BOOKE_INTERRUPT_DECREMENTER | BOOKE_INTERRUPT_DOORBELL

b. bl      kvmppc_handle_exit

c. kvmppc_handle_exit()
{
         int r = RESUME_HOST;
         int s;

         /* update before a new last_exit_type is rewritten */
         kvmppc_update_timing_stats(vcpu);

         /* restart interrupts if they were meant for the host */
         kvmppc_restart_interrupt(vcpu, exit_nr);

         local_irq_enable();	==> Enable again.
....

And shouldn't we handle kvmppc_restart_interrupt() like the original HOST flow?

#define MASKABLE_EXCEPTION(trapnum, intnum, label, hdlr, ack)           \
         START_EXCEPTION(label);                                         \
         NORMAL_EXCEPTION_PROLOG(trapnum, intnum, PROLOG_ADDITION_MASKABLE)\
         EXCEPTION_COMMON(trapnum, PACA_EXGEN, *INTS_DISABLE*)             \
	...

So I think this should be reasonable :)

Tiejun

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "tiejun.chen" <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: <agraf@suse.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	<kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][KVM][PATCH 1/1] kvm:ppc:booke-64: soft-disable interrupts
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 09:56:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51885F49.6060605@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367884257.3398.9@snotra>

On 05/07/2013 07:50 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 05/05/2013 10:13:17 PM, tiejun.chen wrote:
>> On 05/06/2013 11:10 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote:
>>> For the external interrupt, the decrementer exception and the doorbell
>>> excpetion, we also need to soft-disable interrupts while doing as host
>>> interrupt handlers since the DO_KVM hook is always performed to skip
>>> EXCEPTION_COMMON then miss this original chance with the 'ints' (INTS_DISABLE).
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/241344/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/241412/
>
> :-)

I'm observing the same behaviour as well:

	WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());

>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/powerpc/kvm/bookehv_interrupts.S |    9 +++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/bookehv_interrupts.S
>>> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/bookehv_interrupts.S
>>> index e8ed7d6..2fd62bf 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/bookehv_interrupts.S
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/bookehv_interrupts.S
>>> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
>>>
>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>>>   #include <asm/exception-64e.h>
>>> +#include <asm/hw_irq.h>
>>> +#include <asm/irqflags.h>
>>>   #else
>>>   #include "../kernel/head_booke.h" /* for THREAD_NORMSAVE() */
>>>   #endif
>>> @@ -469,6 +471,13 @@ _GLOBAL(kvmppc_resume_host)
>>>       PPC_LL    r3, HOST_RUN(r1)
>>>       mr    r5, r14 /* intno */
>>>       mr    r14, r4 /* Save vcpu pointer. */
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>>> +    /* Should we soft-disable interrupts? */
>>> +    andi.    r6, r5, BOOKE_INTERRUPT_EXTERNAL | BOOKE_INTERRUPT_DECREMENTER
>>> | BOOKE_INTERRUPT_DOORBELL
>>> +    beq    skip_soft_dis
>>> +    SOFT_DISABLE_INTS(r7,r8)
>>> +skip_soft_dis:
>>> +#endif
>
> Why wouldn't we always disable them?  kvmppc_handle_exit() will enable
> interrupts when it's ready.

This only disable soft interrupt for kvmppc_restart_interrupt() that restarts 
interrupts if they were meant for the host:

a. SOFT_DISABLE_INTS() only for BOOKE_INTERRUPT_EXTERNAL | 
BOOKE_INTERRUPT_DECREMENTER | BOOKE_INTERRUPT_DOORBELL

b. bl      kvmppc_handle_exit

c. kvmppc_handle_exit()
{
         int r = RESUME_HOST;
         int s;

         /* update before a new last_exit_type is rewritten */
         kvmppc_update_timing_stats(vcpu);

         /* restart interrupts if they were meant for the host */
         kvmppc_restart_interrupt(vcpu, exit_nr);

         local_irq_enable();	==> Enable again.
....

And shouldn't we handle kvmppc_restart_interrupt() like the original HOST flow?

#define MASKABLE_EXCEPTION(trapnum, intnum, label, hdlr, ack)           \
         START_EXCEPTION(label);                                         \
         NORMAL_EXCEPTION_PROLOG(trapnum, intnum, PROLOG_ADDITION_MASKABLE)\
         EXCEPTION_COMMON(trapnum, PACA_EXGEN, *INTS_DISABLE*)             \
	...

So I think this should be reasonable :)

Tiejun

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-07  1:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-06  3:10 [RFC][KVM][PATCH 1/1] kvm:ppc:booke-64: soft-disable interrupts Tiejun Chen
2013-05-06  3:10 ` Tiejun Chen
2013-05-06  3:10 ` Tiejun Chen
2013-05-06  3:13 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-06  3:13   ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-06  3:13   ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-06 23:50   ` Scott Wood
2013-05-06 23:50     ` Scott Wood
2013-05-07  1:56     ` tiejun.chen [this message]
2013-05-07  1:56       ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-07  1:56       ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-07  2:06       ` Scott Wood
2013-05-07  2:06         ` Scott Wood
2013-05-07  2:43         ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-07  2:43           ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-07  2:43           ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-07  3:04           ` Scott Wood
2013-05-07  3:04             ` Scott Wood
2013-05-08 13:14         ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2013-05-08 13:14           ` Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
2013-05-09  7:33           ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09  7:33             ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09  7:47             ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09  7:47               ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09  7:47               ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09  7:51               ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09  7:51                 ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09  8:04                 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09  8:04                   ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09  8:04                   ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09  8:08                 ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-09  8:08                   ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-09  8:08                   ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-09  8:12                   ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09  8:12                     ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09  8:17                     ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09  8:17                       ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09  8:17                       ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09  8:26                       ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09  8:26                         ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09  8:21                     ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-09  8:21                       ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-09  8:21                       ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-09 12:26                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 12:26                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 12:26                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09  8:23           ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09  8:23             ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09  9:44             ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09  9:44               ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09  9:44               ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 10:00               ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09 10:00                 ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09 10:18                 ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 10:18                   ` [RFC][PATCH " tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 10:18                   ` [RFC][KVM][PATCH " tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 11:21                   ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09 11:21                     ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-05-09 11:35                     ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 11:35                       ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 11:35                       ` tiejun.chen
2013-05-09 12:37               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 12:37                 ` [RFC][PATCH " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 12:37                 ` [RFC][KVM][PATCH " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 13:28                 ` David Laight
2013-05-09 13:28                   ` David Laight
2013-05-09 13:28                   ` David Laight
2013-05-09 22:01                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 22:01                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 22:01                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 14:13                 ` Chen, Tiejun
2013-05-09 14:13                   ` Chen, Tiejun
2013-05-09 14:13                   ` Chen, Tiejun
2013-05-09 21:27                 ` Scott Wood
2013-05-09 21:27                   ` Scott Wood
2013-05-09 22:07                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 22:07                     ` [RFC][PATCH " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 22:07                     ` [RFC][KVM][PATCH " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-09 22:13                     ` Scott Wood
2013-05-09 22:13                       ` Scott Wood
2013-05-10 14:12                     ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-10 14:12                       ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-10 14:12                       ` Kevin Hao
2013-05-10 21:49                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-10 21:49                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-10 21:49                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-10 21:50                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-05-10 21:50                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51885F49.6060605@windriver.com \
    --to=tiejun.chen@windriver.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.