Re: [xen-unstable test] 17914: tolerable FAIL

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>]

On 08/05/13 09:33, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 07:46 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 07.05.13 at 18:43, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>>> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 17914: tolerable FAIL"):
>>>> Ian, I see you also tagged the Xen tree, but unfortunately without
>>>> updating the hypervisor revision to -rc1? Was that intentional? It's
>>>> not a dramatic problem (and I don't see a need to withdraw and
>>>> redo the tag), but maybe worth an addition to the checklist.
>>> You mean XEN_EXTRAVERSION in xen/Makefile ?  I wasn't sure
>>> whether that ought to be changed.  It's on the checklist but I don't
>>> know what the usual practice is for an RC.
>> Keir updated that in the past for the RCs, but personally I don't
>> mind it remaining "-unstable" until the branching occurs.
> It would have been useful so that dmesg logs for people building from
> the tarball will contain the right version. People building from git/hg
> are less of a concern assuming the latest cset thing still works.

I don't think it does:

  \ \/ /___ _ __   | || |  |___ /    _   _ _ __  ___| |_ __ _| |__ | | ___
   \  // _ \ '_ \  | || |_   |_ \ __| | | | '_ \/ __| __/ _` | '_ \| |/ _ \
   /  \  __/ | | | |__   _| ___) |__| |_| | | | \__ \ || (_| | |_) | |  __/
  /_/\_\___|_| |_|    |_|(_)____/    \__,_|_| |_|___/\__\__,_|_.__/|_|\___|

(XEN) Xen version 4.3-unstable (root@) (gcc (Debian 4.7.2-5) 4.7.2) 
debug=y Thu May  2 16:29:11 BST 2013
(XEN) Latest ChangeSet: unavailable

# xl info
host                   : exile
[snip]
xen_changeset          : unavailable
[snip]
cc_compile_date        : Thu May  2 16:29:11 BST 2013

  -George