From: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
To: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: mturquette-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: Use common of_clk_init() function
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 16:54:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5196B539.4040708@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365066351-2395-1-git-send-email-pgaikwad-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On 04/04/2013 03:05 AM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> Use common of_clk_init() function for clocks initialization.
Prashant, can you please resend this to Mike for inclusion in 3.11; now
that we have moved the Tegra clock driver out of arch/arm/mach-tegra, we
should send all clock driver changes through Mike if possible. Thanks.
Just one question though:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/common.c
> -#include <linux/clk/tegra.h>
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
Is clk-provider.h the right header? This code isn't a clock provider?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clk: tegra: Use common of_clk_init() function
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 16:54:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5196B539.4040708@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365066351-2395-1-git-send-email-pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
On 04/04/2013 03:05 AM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> Use common of_clk_init() function for clocks initialization.
Prashant, can you please resend this to Mike for inclusion in 3.11; now
that we have moved the Tegra clock driver out of arch/arm/mach-tegra, we
should send all clock driver changes through Mike if possible. Thanks.
Just one question though:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/common.c
> -#include <linux/clk/tegra.h>
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
Is clk-provider.h the right header? This code isn't a clock provider?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
Cc: mturquette@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: Use common of_clk_init() function
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 16:54:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5196B539.4040708@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365066351-2395-1-git-send-email-pgaikwad@nvidia.com>
On 04/04/2013 03:05 AM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> Use common of_clk_init() function for clocks initialization.
Prashant, can you please resend this to Mike for inclusion in 3.11; now
that we have moved the Tegra clock driver out of arch/arm/mach-tegra, we
should send all clock driver changes through Mike if possible. Thanks.
Just one question though:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/common.c
> -#include <linux/clk/tegra.h>
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
Is clk-provider.h the right header? This code isn't a clock provider?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-17 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-04 9:05 [PATCH] clk: tegra: Use common of_clk_init() function Prashant Gaikwad
2013-04-04 9:05 ` Prashant Gaikwad
2013-04-04 9:05 ` Prashant Gaikwad
[not found] ` <1365066351-2395-1-git-send-email-pgaikwad-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-04 18:20 ` Stephen Warren
2013-04-04 18:20 ` Stephen Warren
2013-04-04 18:20 ` Stephen Warren
2013-05-17 22:54 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-05-17 22:54 ` Stephen Warren
2013-05-17 22:54 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5196B539.4040708@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren-3lzwwm7+weoh9zmkesr00q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mturquette-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pgaikwad-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.