Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU NUMA and memory allocation problem

[Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>]

Adding CC AutoNUMA folks:

Paolo said that:

> Pinning memory to host NUMA nodes is not implemented.  Something like
> AutoNUMA would be able to balance the memory the right way.
> 
> Paolo

And Eduardo said that:
> I had plans to implement a mechanism to allow external tools to
> implement manual pinning, but it is not one of my top priorities. It's
> the kind of mechanism that may be obsolete since birth, if we have
> AutoNUMA working and doing the right thing.
> 
> -- Eduardo 

But I didn't see any change when I enabled the AutoNUMA on my host.
Can AutoNUMA folks teach me why?
Or any plans to handle this problem in AutoNUMA?


Thanks,
Wanlong Gao



> Hi,
> 
> We just met a problem of QEMU memory allocation.
> Here is the description:
> 
> On my host, I have two nodes,
> # numactl -H
> available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> node 0 cpus: 0 2
> node 0 size: 4010 MB
> node 0 free: 3021 MB
> node 1 cpus: 1 3
> node 1 size: 4030 MB
> node 1 free: 2881 MB
> node distances:
> node   0   1 
>   0:  10  20 
>   1:  20  10 
> 
> 
> 
> I created a guest using the following XML:
> 
> ...
>   <memory unit='KiB'>1048576</memory>
>   <currentMemory unit='KiB'>1048576</currentMemory>
>   <vcpu placement='static'>2</vcpu>
>   <cputune>
>     <vcpupin vcpu='0' cpuset='2'/>
>     <vcpupin vcpu='1' cpuset='3'/>
>   </cputune>
>   <numatune>
>     <memory mode='strict' nodeset='0-1'/>
>   </numatune>
>   <cpu>
>     <topology sockets='2' cores='1' threads='1'/>
>     <numa>
>       <cell cpus='0' memory='524288'/>
>       <cell cpus='1' memory='524288'/>
>     </numa>
>   </cpu>
> ...
> 
> As you can see, I assigned 1G memory to this guest, pined vcpu0 to the host CPU 2,
> it's in host node0, pined vcpu1 to the host CPU 3 that is in host node1.
> The guest also has two nodes, each node contains 512M memory.
> 
> Now, I started the guest, then printed the host numa state :
> # numactl -H
> available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> node 0 cpus: 0 2
> node 0 size: 4010 MB
> node 0 free: 2647 MB  <=== freecell of node0
> node 1 cpus: 1 3
> node 1 size: 4030 MB
> node 1 free: 2746 MB
> node distances:
> node   0   1 
>   0:  10  20 
>   1:  20  10 
> 
> Then I tried to allocate memory from guest node0 using the following code:
>> #include <memory.h>
>> #include <numa.h>
>>
>> #define MEM (1024*1024*300)
>>
>> int main(void)
>> {
>> 	char *p = numa_alloc_onnode(MEM, 0);
>> 	memset(p, 0, MEM);
>> 	sleep(1000);
>> 	numa_free(p, MEM);
>> 	return 0;
>> }
> 
> And printed the host numa state, it shows that this 300M memory is allocated from host node0,
> 
> # numactl -H
> available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> node 0 cpus: 0 2
> node 0 size: 4010 MB
> node 0 free: 2345 MB	<===== reduced ~300M
> node 1 cpus: 1 3
> node 1 size: 4030 MB
> node 1 free: 2767 MB
> node distances:
> node   0   1 
>   0:  10  20 
>   1:  20  10 
> 
> 
> Then, I tried the same method to allocate 300M memory from guest node1, and printed the host
> numa state:
> 
> # numactl -H
> available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> node 0 cpus: 0 2
> node 0 size: 4010 MB
> node 0 free: 2059 MB	<=== reduced ~300M
> node 1 cpus: 1 3
> node 1 size: 4030 MB
> node 1 free: 2767 MB	<=== no change
> node distances:
> node   0   1 
>   0:  10  20 
>   1:  20  10 
> 
> 
> To see that this 300M memory is allocated from host node0 again, but not host node1 as
> I expected.
> 
> We think that QEMU can't handled this numa memory allocation well, and it will cause the
> cross node memory access performance regression.
> 
> Any thoughts? Or, am I missing something?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Wanlong Gao
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>