From: Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner <f.wiessner@smart-weblications.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, liquidhorse@gmail.com, andy@greyhouse.net,
fubar@us.ibm.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, nikolay@redhat.com, vfalico@redhat.com
Subject: Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 21:35:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <519D1DEF.8090206@smart-weblications.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130522190640.GA20276@kroah.com>
Hi Greg,
Am 22.05.2013 21:06, schrieb Greg KH:> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:16:25PM +0200,
Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Am 22.05.2013 18:23, schrieb Greg KH:
>>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:16:11PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner wrote:
>>>> Am 22.05.2013 15:57, schrieb Greg KH:
>>>>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:36:09PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH -
Florian Wiessner wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> why is this patch still not backported to 3.4?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I today tried 3.4.46 from kernel.org, but the patch STILL seems _NOT_
included?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WHY IS THAT?
>>>>>
>>>>> <formletter>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
>>>>> stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
>>>>> for how to do this properly.
>>>>>
>>>>> </formletter>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't want to submit a patch - i wanted to know why this patch still is
not in
>>>> the kernel (it is afaics at least 6 months old!)
>>>
>>> Perhaps because it was not submitted properly as documented above?
>>>
>>
>> Well, i don't know. I have not written that patch, but tested and applied it
>> against 3.4.36 where it worked fine.
>>
>> But i am unable to apply it to 3.4.46 (there are rejects if i try to apply it,
>> obviously because there were changes in the meanwhile) - It would be cool if
>> someone could tell if that patch is really needed anymore with 3.4.46.
>>
>> I am no C coder and only have little C experience, but i'd like to use this
>> patch with current 3.4 stable Kernel or at least make sure that this patch is
>> not needed anymore with current stable kernels...
>
> Why do you think that it is needed? And does it match up to a specific
> change that is already in Linus's tree? That is a requirement here.
>
It is needed, because without it (at least in 3.4.36) virtualized guests
(kvm/qemu) are unable to use br0 (bridge) if the bridge uses a bond with mode 6
(balance-alb).
https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-next/+/567b871e503316b0927e54a3d7c86d50b722d955%5E!/
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1302.0/00539.html
Thanks,
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Florian Wiessner
Smart Weblications GmbH
Martinsberger Str. 1
D-95119 Naila
fon.: +49 9282 9638 200
fax.: +49 9282 9638 205
24/7: +49 900 144 000 00 - 0,99 EUR/Min*
http://www.smart-weblications.de
--
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Naila
Geschäftsführer: Florian Wiessner
HRB-Nr.: HRB 3840 Amtsgericht Hof
*aus dem dt. Festnetz, ggf. abweichende Preise aus dem Mobilfunknetz
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner <f.wiessner@smart-weblications.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, liquidhorse@gmail.com, andy@greyhouse.net,
fubar@us.ibm.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, nikolay@redhat.com, vfalico@redhat.com
Subject: Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 21:35:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <519D1DEF.8090206@smart-weblications.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130522190640.GA20276@kroah.com>
Hi Greg,
Am 22.05.2013 21:06, schrieb Greg KH:> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:16:25PM +0200,
Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Am 22.05.2013 18:23, schrieb Greg KH:
>>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:16:11PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner wrote:
>>>> Am 22.05.2013 15:57, schrieb Greg KH:
>>>>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:36:09PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH -
Florian Wiessner wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> why is this patch still not backported to 3.4?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I today tried 3.4.46 from kernel.org, but the patch STILL seems _NOT_
included?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WHY IS THAT?
>>>>>
>>>>> <formletter>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
>>>>> stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
>>>>> for how to do this properly.
>>>>>
>>>>> </formletter>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't want to submit a patch - i wanted to know why this patch still is
not in
>>>> the kernel (it is afaics at least 6 months old!)
>>>
>>> Perhaps because it was not submitted properly as documented above?
>>>
>>
>> Well, i don't know. I have not written that patch, but tested and applied it
>> against 3.4.36 where it worked fine.
>>
>> But i am unable to apply it to 3.4.46 (there are rejects if i try to apply it,
>> obviously because there were changes in the meanwhile) - It would be cool if
>> someone could tell if that patch is really needed anymore with 3.4.46.
>>
>> I am no C coder and only have little C experience, but i'd like to use this
>> patch with current 3.4 stable Kernel or at least make sure that this patch is
>> not needed anymore with current stable kernels...
>
> Why do you think that it is needed? And does it match up to a specific
> change that is already in Linus's tree? That is a requirement here.
>
It is needed, because without it (at least in 3.4.36) virtualized guests
(kvm/qemu) are unable to use br0 (bridge) if the bridge uses a bond with mode 6
(balance-alb).
https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-next/+/567b871e503316b0927e54a3d7c86d50b722d955%5E!/
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1302.0/00539.html
Thanks,
--
Mit freundlichen Gr��en,
Florian Wiessner
Smart Weblications GmbH
Martinsberger Str. 1
D-95119 Naila
fon.: +49 9282 9638 200
fax.: +49 9282 9638 205
24/7: +49 900 144 000 00 - 0,99 EUR/Min*
http://www.smart-weblications.de
--
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Naila
Gesch�ftsf�hrer: Florian Wiessner
HRB-Nr.: HRB 3840 Amtsgericht Hof
*aus dem dt. Festnetz, ggf. abweichende Preise aus dem Mobilfunknetz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-22 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-22 11:36 https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-05-22 11:36 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-05-22 13:57 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Greg KH
2013-05-22 16:16 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-05-22 16:16 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-05-22 16:23 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Greg KH
2013-05-22 18:16 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-05-22 18:16 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-05-22 19:06 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Greg KH
2013-05-22 19:35 ` Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner [this message]
2013-05-22 19:35 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-05-22 20:04 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Greg KH
2013-05-22 21:26 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-05-22 21:26 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-05-22 21:54 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Jay Vosburgh
2013-05-22 22:24 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-05-22 22:24 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-05-22 22:32 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Greg KH
2013-05-22 23:17 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Matthew O'Connor
2013-05-23 10:24 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-05-23 10:24 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-05-23 12:35 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Matthew O'Connor
2013-05-23 13:36 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-05-23 13:36 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-05-23 12:46 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Matthew O'Connor
2013-05-29 1:01 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-05-29 1:01 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-05-29 1:10 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 David Miller
2013-05-29 1:15 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Greg KH
2013-06-13 1:15 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Ben Hutchings
2013-06-18 11:47 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-06-18 17:23 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Matthew O'Connor
2013-06-18 17:23 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Matthew O'Connor
2013-06-20 15:59 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
2013-06-20 15:59 ` https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531 Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=519D1DEF.8090206@smart-weblications.de \
--to=f.wiessner@smart-weblications.de \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liquidhorse@gmail.com \
--cc=nikolay@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vfalico@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.