From: Jon Hunter <jgchunter@gmail.com>
To: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [BISECTED] 3.10-rc1 OMAP1 GPIO IRQ regression
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 19:41:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A4FA72.2070402@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130523201358.GI31836@blackmetal.musicnaut.iki.fi>
On 23/05/13 21:13, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 08:02:05PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 22/05/13 22:20, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 08:37:16PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>> On 21/05/13 18:39, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:46:21AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>>>> * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [130516 14:50]:
>>>>>>> * Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> [130516 14:05]:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:09:34AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>>>>>>> * Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> [130513 13:58]:
>>>>>>>>>> I tested 3.10-rc1 on OMAP1 / Nokia 770, and Retu MFD probe is broken:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.264221] retu-mfd 2-0001: Retu v3.2 found
>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.281951] retu-mfd 2-0001: Failed to allocate IRQs: -12
>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.300140] retu-mfd: probe of 2-0001 failed with error -12
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The error is coming from regmap code. According to git bisect, it is
>>>>>>>>>> caused by:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> commit ede4d7a5b9835510fd1f724367f68d2fa4128453
>>>>>>>>>> Author: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri Mar 1 11:22:47 2013 -0600
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> gpio/omap: convert gpio irq domain to linear mapping
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The commit does not anymore revert cleanly, and I haven't yet tried
>>>>>>>>>> crafting a manual revert, so any fix proposals/ideas are welcome...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hmm this might be a bit trickier to fix. Obviously the real solution
>>>>>>>>> is to convert omap1 to SPARSE_IRQ like we did for omap2+.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For the -rc cycle, it might be possible to fix this by adding a
>>>>>>>>> different irq_to_gpio() and gpio_to_irq() functions for omap1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The commit reverts cleanly if we also revert
>>>>>>>> 3513cdeccc647d41c4a9ff923af17deaaac04a66 (gpio/omap: optimise interrupt
>>>>>>>> service routine), which seems to be just some minor optimization. The
>>>>>>>> result is below, and with it 770 works again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmm in this case it seems that we should just fix it rather than go back
>>>>>>> to the old code, so let's take a look at that first.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does the following fix it for you or do we need to fix something else
>>>>>> there too?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, that fixes Retu probe on 770.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for not responding sooner, but I have been moving.
>>>>
>>>> From looking at the code it appears that the regmap_add_irq_chip()
>>>> is failing in the retu driver. I am not sure if this will work,
>>>> but have you tried making the following change to the retu driver
>>>> so that it also uses irq_domain_add_linear() as well? Just a thought ...
>>>
>>> This will trigger WARNING: at drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c:514.
>>
>> Sorry, there is another change needed. Can you try ...
>
> I will try this. However, I would also like to point out that Retu works
> fine on N800/N810 (OMAP2). If the problem is in Retu, why only OMAP1
> is affected?
The problem is not with retu or the gpio driver per-se, its just that
now they are conflicting because the way the irq domains are being
allocated. So probably just getting lucky on the n8xx. I had tested on
omap1-4 and had not seen any problems, but none of my boards used the
retu driver.
Cheers
Jon
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jgchunter@gmail.com (Jon Hunter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [BISECTED] 3.10-rc1 OMAP1 GPIO IRQ regression
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 19:41:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A4FA72.2070402@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130523201358.GI31836@blackmetal.musicnaut.iki.fi>
On 23/05/13 21:13, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 08:02:05PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 22/05/13 22:20, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 08:37:16PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>> On 21/05/13 18:39, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:46:21AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>>>> * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [130516 14:50]:
>>>>>>> * Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> [130516 14:05]:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:09:34AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>>>>>>> * Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> [130513 13:58]:
>>>>>>>>>> I tested 3.10-rc1 on OMAP1 / Nokia 770, and Retu MFD probe is broken:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.264221] retu-mfd 2-0001: Retu v3.2 found
>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.281951] retu-mfd 2-0001: Failed to allocate IRQs: -12
>>>>>>>>>> [ 2.300140] retu-mfd: probe of 2-0001 failed with error -12
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The error is coming from regmap code. According to git bisect, it is
>>>>>>>>>> caused by:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> commit ede4d7a5b9835510fd1f724367f68d2fa4128453
>>>>>>>>>> Author: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri Mar 1 11:22:47 2013 -0600
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> gpio/omap: convert gpio irq domain to linear mapping
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The commit does not anymore revert cleanly, and I haven't yet tried
>>>>>>>>>> crafting a manual revert, so any fix proposals/ideas are welcome...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hmm this might be a bit trickier to fix. Obviously the real solution
>>>>>>>>> is to convert omap1 to SPARSE_IRQ like we did for omap2+.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For the -rc cycle, it might be possible to fix this by adding a
>>>>>>>>> different irq_to_gpio() and gpio_to_irq() functions for omap1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The commit reverts cleanly if we also revert
>>>>>>>> 3513cdeccc647d41c4a9ff923af17deaaac04a66 (gpio/omap: optimise interrupt
>>>>>>>> service routine), which seems to be just some minor optimization. The
>>>>>>>> result is below, and with it 770 works again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmm in this case it seems that we should just fix it rather than go back
>>>>>>> to the old code, so let's take a look at that first.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does the following fix it for you or do we need to fix something else
>>>>>> there too?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, that fixes Retu probe on 770.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for not responding sooner, but I have been moving.
>>>>
>>>> From looking at the code it appears that the regmap_add_irq_chip()
>>>> is failing in the retu driver. I am not sure if this will work,
>>>> but have you tried making the following change to the retu driver
>>>> so that it also uses irq_domain_add_linear() as well? Just a thought ...
>>>
>>> This will trigger WARNING: at drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c:514.
>>
>> Sorry, there is another change needed. Can you try ...
>
> I will try this. However, I would also like to point out that Retu works
> fine on N800/N810 (OMAP2). If the problem is in Retu, why only OMAP1
> is affected?
The problem is not with retu or the gpio driver per-se, its just that
now they are conflicting because the way the irq domains are being
allocated. So probably just getting lucky on the n8xx. I had tested on
omap1-4 and had not seen any problems, but none of my boards used the
retu driver.
Cheers
Jon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-28 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-13 20:53 [BISECTED] 3.10-rc1 OMAP1 GPIO IRQ regression Aaro Koskinen
2013-05-13 20:53 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-05-16 18:09 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-05-16 18:09 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-05-16 21:00 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-05-16 21:00 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-05-16 21:44 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-05-16 21:44 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-05-20 17:46 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-05-20 17:46 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-05-21 17:39 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-05-21 17:39 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-05-21 19:37 ` Jon Hunter
2013-05-21 19:37 ` Jon Hunter
2013-05-22 21:20 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-05-22 21:20 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-05-23 19:02 ` Jon Hunter
2013-05-23 19:02 ` Jon Hunter
2013-05-23 20:13 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-05-23 20:13 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-05-28 18:41 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2013-05-28 18:41 ` Jon Hunter
2013-05-26 19:07 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-05-26 19:07 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-05-28 18:42 ` Jon Hunter
2013-05-28 18:42 ` Jon Hunter
2013-05-29 18:55 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-05-29 18:55 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-05-29 21:29 ` Jon Hunter
2013-05-29 21:29 ` Jon Hunter
2013-05-29 22:41 ` Jon Hunter
2013-05-29 22:41 ` Jon Hunter
2013-06-05 22:33 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-05 22:33 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-06 15:53 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-06-06 15:53 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-06-23 22:16 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-06-23 22:16 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-06-23 23:06 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-06-23 23:06 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-06-23 23:43 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-06-23 23:43 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-06-24 1:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-06-24 1:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-06-24 7:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-06-24 7:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-06-24 15:35 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-06-24 15:35 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2013-06-25 18:14 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-06-25 18:14 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-06-24 15:53 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-24 15:53 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-25 7:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-06-25 7:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-06-25 11:49 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-25 11:49 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-26 7:06 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-06-26 7:06 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51A4FA72.2070402@gmail.com \
--to=jgchunter@gmail.com \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.