From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux390@de.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org"
<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch: s390: appldata: using strncpy() and strnlen() instead of sprintf()
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 01:28:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A559CB.3020804@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5895.1369743429@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On 05/28/2013 08:17 PM, David Howells wrote:
> Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com> wrote:
>
>> Your suggestion will improve the speed, but may merge "transferring
>> 'protocol' data" and "processing 'protocol' data" together.
>
> Look at it this way: You're having to step very carefully because you are
> fully expecting the strings not to be NUL-terminated. Therefore you probably
> avoid using string functions if you can.
>
> In fact, looking at the code, why are you copying the data through an
> intermediate buffer at all? Why not just copy directly to userspace:
>
> int len;
> char buf[2];
>
> if (!*lenp || *ppos) {
> *lenp = 0;
> return 0;
> }
> if (!write) {
> - len = sprintf(buf, appldata_timer_active ? "1\n" : "0\n");
> + const char *ptr = appldata_timer_active ? "1\n" : "0\n";
> + size_t len = 2;
> if (len > *lenp)
> len = *lenp;
> if (copy_to_user(buffer, buf, len))
may: "if (copy_to_user(buffer, ptr, len))" ?
:-)
> return -EFAULT;
> goto out;
> }
>
> Put like that, it's fairly obvious what is going on.
>
It seems well fixed (still independent of processing 'protocol' data).
:-)
And how about below:
-------------------------------diff begin------------------------------
diff --git a/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c b/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c
index bae0f40..27f200d 100644
--- a/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c
+++ b/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c
@@ -212,10 +212,9 @@ appldata_timer_handler(ctl_table *ctl, int write,
return 0;
}
if (!write) {
- len = sprintf(buf, appldata_timer_active ? "1\n" : "0\n");
- if (len > *lenp)
- len = *lenp;
- if (copy_to_user(buffer, buf, len))
+ if (copy_to_user(buffer,
+ appldata_timer_active ? "1\n" : "0\n",
+ min(2, *lenp))
return -EFAULT;
goto out;
}
-------------------------------diff end--------------------------------
Thanks
--
Chen Gang
Asianux Corporation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux390@de.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org"
<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch: s390: appldata: using strncpy() and strnlen() instead of sprintf()
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 09:28:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A559CB.3020804@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5895.1369743429@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On 05/28/2013 08:17 PM, David Howells wrote:
> Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com> wrote:
>
>> Your suggestion will improve the speed, but may merge "transferring
>> 'protocol' data" and "processing 'protocol' data" together.
>
> Look at it this way: You're having to step very carefully because you are
> fully expecting the strings not to be NUL-terminated. Therefore you probably
> avoid using string functions if you can.
>
> In fact, looking at the code, why are you copying the data through an
> intermediate buffer at all? Why not just copy directly to userspace:
>
> int len;
> char buf[2];
>
> if (!*lenp || *ppos) {
> *lenp = 0;
> return 0;
> }
> if (!write) {
> - len = sprintf(buf, appldata_timer_active ? "1\n" : "0\n");
> + const char *ptr = appldata_timer_active ? "1\n" : "0\n";
> + size_t len = 2;
> if (len > *lenp)
> len = *lenp;
> if (copy_to_user(buffer, buf, len))
may: "if (copy_to_user(buffer, ptr, len))" ?
:-)
> return -EFAULT;
> goto out;
> }
>
> Put like that, it's fairly obvious what is going on.
>
It seems well fixed (still independent of processing 'protocol' data).
:-)
And how about below:
-------------------------------diff begin------------------------------
diff --git a/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c b/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c
index bae0f40..27f200d 100644
--- a/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c
+++ b/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c
@@ -212,10 +212,9 @@ appldata_timer_handler(ctl_table *ctl, int write,
return 0;
}
if (!write) {
- len = sprintf(buf, appldata_timer_active ? "1\n" : "0\n");
- if (len > *lenp)
- len = *lenp;
- if (copy_to_user(buffer, buf, len))
+ if (copy_to_user(buffer,
+ appldata_timer_active ? "1\n" : "0\n",
+ min(2, *lenp))
return -EFAULT;
goto out;
}
-------------------------------diff end--------------------------------
Thanks
--
Chen Gang
Asianux Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-29 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-27 2:59 [PATCH] arch: s390: appldata: using strncpy() instead of sprintf() Chen Gang
2013-05-27 8:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-05-27 8:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-05-27 9:06 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-27 9:06 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-27 9:43 ` [PATCH] arch: s390: include: asm: typo issue for the redundency comma, found by cross compiling Chen Gang
2013-05-27 9:43 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-27 9:55 ` [PATCH v2] arch: s390: appldata: using strncpy() and strnlen() instead of sprintf() Chen Gang
2013-05-27 9:55 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-27 16:23 ` Gerald Schaefer
2013-05-27 16:23 ` Gerald Schaefer
2013-05-28 4:58 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-28 4:58 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-27 16:53 ` walter harms
2013-05-28 5:12 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-28 10:22 ` David Howells
2013-05-28 10:22 ` David Howells
2013-05-28 11:03 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-28 11:03 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-28 12:17 ` David Howells
2013-05-28 12:17 ` David Howells
2013-05-28 16:03 ` Gerald Schaefer
2013-05-28 16:03 ` Gerald Schaefer
2013-05-29 1:40 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-29 1:40 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-29 1:28 ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-05-29 1:28 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-29 6:30 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-05-29 6:30 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-05-29 7:29 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-29 7:29 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-29 7:47 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-29 7:47 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51A559CB.3020804@asianux.com \
--to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.