From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: increase precision of x86_platform.get/set_wallclock()
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 13:16:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A5F1A6.6080204@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51A54939.10905@linaro.org>
On 29/05/13 01:18, John Stultz wrote:
> On 05/13/2013 10:56 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
>> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>>
>> All the virtualized platforms (KVM, lguest and Xen) have persistent
>> wallclocks that have more than one second of precision.
>>
>> read_persistent_wallclock() and update_persistent_wallclock() allow
>> for nanosecond precision but their implementation on x86 with
>> x86_platform.get/set_wallclock() only allows for one second precision.
>> This means guests may see a wallclock time that is off by up to 1
>> second.
>>
>> Make set_wallclock() and get_wallclock() take a struct timespec
>> parameter (which allows for nanosecond precision) so KVM and Xen
>> guests may start with a more accurate wallclock time and a Xen dom0
>> can maintain a more accurate wallclock for guests.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/mc146818rtc.h | 4 ++--
>> arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h | 6 ++++--
>> arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c | 9 +++------
>> arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c | 17 +++++++----------
>> arch/x86/lguest/boot.c | 4 ++--
>> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 10 ++++++----
>> arch/x86/xen/time.c | 19 ++++++-------------
>> include/linux/efi.h | 4 ++--
>
> Just FYI, David: You missed the vrtc code with this conversion.
>
> I finally got around to pushing my current queue to my public tree and
> the kbuild robot noticed the build failure (required INTEL_MID config to
> trigger).
>
> The fix I've queued is here:
> https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/jstultz/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=52d8e9cc6718ae9e6c44b7723028e4717ba91c8b;hp=1dd5234774b33a17743ae62e8b46b5cd0059e1c7
Oops. Sorry about that. That fix looks fine.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-29 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-13 17:56 [PATCH 0/3] x86,time,xen: maintain an accurate persistent clock in more cases David Vrabel
2013-05-13 17:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: increase precision of x86_platform.get/set_wallclock() David Vrabel
2013-05-14 0:57 ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 0:57 ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 17:52 ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 17:52 ` John Stultz
2013-05-29 0:18 ` John Stultz
2013-05-29 12:16 ` David Vrabel
2013-05-29 12:16 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2013-05-29 0:18 ` John Stultz
2013-05-13 17:56 ` David Vrabel
2013-05-13 17:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] timekeeping: sync persistent clock and RTC on system time step changes David Vrabel
2013-05-14 0:40 ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 9:47 ` David Vrabel
2013-05-14 17:15 ` John Stultz
2013-05-15 8:16 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-15 8:16 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-05-15 18:10 ` John Stultz
2013-05-28 18:26 ` David Vrabel
2013-05-28 18:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-28 19:09 ` John Stultz
2013-05-28 19:09 ` [Xen-devel] " John Stultz
2013-05-28 19:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-28 19:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-28 20:03 ` John Stultz
2013-05-28 20:03 ` [Xen-devel] " John Stultz
2013-05-28 20:11 ` John Stultz
2013-05-28 20:11 ` [Xen-devel] " John Stultz
2013-05-28 20:25 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-28 20:25 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-28 20:30 ` [Xen-devel] " John Stultz
2013-05-28 20:30 ` John Stultz
2013-05-28 18:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-28 19:06 ` [Xen-devel] " John Stultz
2013-05-28 19:06 ` John Stultz
2013-05-28 18:26 ` David Vrabel
2013-05-15 18:10 ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 17:15 ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 9:47 ` David Vrabel
2013-05-14 0:40 ` John Stultz
2013-05-13 17:56 ` David Vrabel
2013-05-13 17:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/xen: sync the CMOS RTC as well as the Xen wallclock David Vrabel
2013-05-13 17:56 ` David Vrabel
2013-05-14 0:52 ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 0:52 ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 7:57 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-05-14 15:59 ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 16:14 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-14 16:14 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-05-14 16:17 ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 16:17 ` [Xen-devel] " John Stultz
2013-05-14 16:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-14 16:28 ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 16:28 ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 16:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-14 15:59 ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 7:57 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-14 9:55 ` David Vrabel
2013-05-14 9:55 ` David Vrabel
2013-05-14 17:24 ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 18:00 ` David Vrabel
2013-05-14 18:03 ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 18:03 ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 18:00 ` David Vrabel
2013-05-15 8:19 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-15 8:19 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2013-05-15 18:13 ` John Stultz
2013-05-15 18:13 ` John Stultz
2013-05-14 17:24 ` John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51A5F1A6.6080204@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.