All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>
To: t.figa@gmail.com
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	kgene.kim@samsung.com, olof@lixom.net, patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: S5P64X0: Remove duplicate uncompress code
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 09:48:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51AC18FF.9010108@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51A9B3BC.9000405@gmail.com>

On 06/01/2013 02:11 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 05/31/2013 01:49 PM, Tushar Behera wrote:
>> The uncompress code in S5P64X0 is almost same as the uncompress code
>> defined in plat-samsung. Better to reuse that code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera<tushar.behera@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/include/mach/uncompress.h |  163
>> ++---------------------
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)
> 
> Not sure if you are aware of it, Tomasz has already posted a patch that
> removes this duplicated code: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2589331
> I think that patch is not yet merged though.
> 
> Regards,
> Sylwester

Tomasz,

I had somehow missed that mail.

The patch that I have additionally makes calculation of uart_base
conditional on DEBUG_LL in line with the rest of the patches.

Would you mind re-spining your patch with those changes?

Alternately, I can take your patch and do above modifications in them.

Let me know your opinion on this.

-- 
Tushar Behera

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tushar.behera@linaro.org (Tushar Behera)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: S5P64X0: Remove duplicate uncompress code
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 09:48:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51AC18FF.9010108@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51A9B3BC.9000405@gmail.com>

On 06/01/2013 02:11 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 05/31/2013 01:49 PM, Tushar Behera wrote:
>> The uncompress code in S5P64X0 is almost same as the uncompress code
>> defined in plat-samsung. Better to reuse that code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera<tushar.behera@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/include/mach/uncompress.h |  163
>> ++---------------------
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)
> 
> Not sure if you are aware of it, Tomasz has already posted a patch that
> removes this duplicated code: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2589331
> I think that patch is not yet merged though.
> 
> Regards,
> Sylwester

Tomasz,

I had somehow missed that mail.

The patch that I have additionally makes calculation of uart_base
conditional on DEBUG_LL in line with the rest of the patches.

Would you mind re-spining your patch with those changes?

Alternately, I can take your patch and do above modifications in them.

Let me know your opinion on this.

-- 
Tushar Behera

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-03  4:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-31 11:49 [PATCH 0/3] Consolidate uncompress code for Samsung platform Tushar Behera
2013-05-31 11:49 ` Tushar Behera
2013-05-31 11:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS: uncompress - print debug messages if DEBUG_LL is defined Tushar Behera
2013-05-31 11:49   ` Tushar Behera
2013-06-01  3:59   ` Olof Johansson
2013-06-01  3:59     ` Olof Johansson
2013-06-03  4:57     ` Tushar Behera
2013-06-03  4:57       ` Tushar Behera
2013-05-31 11:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Consolidate uncompress subroutine Tushar Behera
2013-05-31 11:49   ` Tushar Behera
2013-06-01  4:00   ` Olof Johansson
2013-06-01  4:00     ` Olof Johansson
2013-05-31 11:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: S5P64X0: Remove duplicate uncompress code Tushar Behera
2013-05-31 11:49   ` Tushar Behera
2013-06-01  8:41   ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-06-01  8:41     ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-06-03  4:18     ` Tushar Behera [this message]
2013-06-03  4:18       ` Tushar Behera
2013-06-03 11:40       ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-03 11:40         ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-03 11:55         ` Tushar Behera
2013-06-03 11:55           ` Tushar Behera

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51AC18FF.9010108@linaro.org \
    --to=tushar.behera@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com \
    --cc=t.figa@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.