From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>, "Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] AMD/intremap: Prevent use of per-device vector maps until irq logic is fixed
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 16:41:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51ACB925.7040300@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51ACD22102000078000DA9D3@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 03/06/13 16:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 03.06.13 at 17:17, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 03/06/13 16:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 03.06.13 at 16:35, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> As I said, this reverts to the behaviour before XSA-36, but without the
>>>> security issue of a single IOMMU interrupt remapping table. Before
>>>> XSA-36, all AMD systems were limited in vector range because of the
>>>> global used_vector map.
>>> Right, so you'd trade one regression for another (less severe, but
>>> anyway).
>> Absolutely, especially when it comes to trying to fix a regression we
>> have pushed out in a security fix.
>>
>> Ideally a proper fix to MSI-X issue can be found, but failing a timely
>> fix, reverting to the pre XSA-36 behaviour but without the security
>> issue is a good solution.
> Just to repeat - "can be found" is the wrong term, as we already
> have a patch pending that - from all I can tell - would take care of
> the problem (and you not stating anything to the contrary makes
> me assume you agree).
>
> Jan
I would agree that it looks to fix the underlying issue.
It is however quite a large change to a subtle part of the code, which
makes me hesitant about declaring it a good backport candidate for
previous versions.
~Andrew
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-03 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-31 20:04 [PATCH v2] AMD/intremap: Prevent use of per-device vector maps until irq logic is fixed Andrew Cooper
2013-06-03 14:07 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-03 14:35 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-06-03 15:01 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-03 15:17 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-06-03 15:28 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-03 15:41 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2013-06-04 13:12 ` George Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51ACB925.7040300@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.