All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] AMD/intremap: Prevent use of per-device vector maps until irq logic is fixed
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 14:12:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51ADE7A9.2050804@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51ACBF3702000078000DA924@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On 06/03/2013 03:07 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 31.05.13 at 22:04, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> In an effort to get AMD systems back to a non-regressed state, introduce a
>> new
>> type of vector map called per-device-global.  This uses per-device vector maps
>> in the IOMMU, but uses a single used_vector map for the core IRQ logic.
>
> So what's the reason for not simply using OPT_IRQ_VECTOR_MAP_GLOBAL
> here?
>
>> This patch is intended to be removed as soon as the per-device logic is fixed
>> correctly.
>
> As a last resort thing this may be acceptable, but I'd much favor to
> fix this properly rather than hacking it like this. Hence I'd really like
> to put up for discussion to instead use the patch[1] already posted
> as preparatory for the multi-vector MSI support doing away with the
> use of the vector for indexing the IRTE (and, in a second patch[2],
> the enforcement of OPT_IRQ_VECTOR_MAP_PERDEV).

Unfortunately this is the time of the release to do simple hacks.  We 
can obviously back this out when we get hte multi-vector MSI suport in.


> Also, overriding a command line request in the way you do is a
> no-go imo - even if this would cause [theoretical] problems, we
> ought to honor the request as long as we can't tell for sure that
> this is going to break the specific system. That's even more so
> since requesting per-device vector maps to be used on VT-d ought
> to yield exactly the same effect, yet you don't override the mode
> there.

I agree -- we need to have a sensible default, but we also need to have 
a way to override behavior if it turns out to cause a problem.

  -George

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-04 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-31 20:04 [PATCH v2] AMD/intremap: Prevent use of per-device vector maps until irq logic is fixed Andrew Cooper
2013-06-03 14:07 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-03 14:35   ` Andrew Cooper
2013-06-03 15:01     ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-03 15:17       ` Andrew Cooper
2013-06-03 15:28         ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-03 15:41           ` Andrew Cooper
2013-06-04 13:12   ` George Dunlap [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51ADE7A9.2050804@eu.citrix.com \
    --to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.