diff for duplicates of <51B063A7.8020907@ti.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 4abe820..420a0ef 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ On 6/5/2013 5:11 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> 3) No need of davinci_serial_setup_clk(), not called from >> multiple places, hence reduce function call overhead. >> ->> Signed-off-by: Manjunathappa, Prakash <prakash.pm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> ->> Suggested-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> +>> Signed-off-by: Manjunathappa, Prakash <prakash.pm@ti.com> +>> Suggested-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> > > We generally clean up code before undertaking modifications. Is there a > reason why this cannot be done first-up? diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index fc2a912..90da065 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,19 +1,10 @@ "ref\01369729686-6595-1-git-send-email-prakash.pm@ti.com\0" "ref\01369729686-6595-6-git-send-email-prakash.pm@ti.com\0" "ref\051AF2400.3020906@ti.com\0" - "ref\051AF2400.3020906-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0Sekhar Nori <nsekhar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: davinci: serial: platform code cleanup\0" + "From\0nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: davinci: serial: platform code cleanup\0" "Date\0Thu, 6 Jun 2013 15:55:43 +0530\0" - "To\0Sekhar Nori <nsekhar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Cc\0davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org" - linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org - devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org - rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org - grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org - linux-serial-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - hs-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org - " linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 6/5/2013 5:11 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:\n" @@ -29,8 +20,8 @@ ">> 3) No need of davinci_serial_setup_clk(), not called from\n" ">> multiple places, hence reduce function call overhead.\n" ">>\n" - ">> Signed-off-by: Manjunathappa, Prakash <prakash.pm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>\n" - ">> Suggested-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>\n" + ">> Signed-off-by: Manjunathappa, Prakash <prakash.pm@ti.com>\n" + ">> Suggested-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>\n" "> \n" "> We generally clean up code before undertaking modifications. Is there a\n" "> reason why this cannot be done first-up?\n" @@ -42,4 +33,4 @@ "Thanks,\n" Sekhar -c5225095d17bbe92da33044a696d7eb144188e5878ff5a9b3d3d4cac39fab299 +fd8589f796bd71ea4fdbec140535fc77b151d63dd7337177b8286c0b92ba218e
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.