From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] sh_eth: deal with #ifdef'fery
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:24:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B1D112.8030805@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130606.160504.85747659460186927.davem@davemloft.net>
Hello.
On 07-06-2013 3:05, David Miller wrote:
>> This series of 8 patches are against Dave's 'net-next.git' repository.
>> The series deals mostly with excess #ifdef'fery in the 'sh_eth' driver.
>> It doesn't yet get rid of all the #ifdef'fery but that's a matter of another
>> patchset. The last patch (it was almost in the middle of the series before),
>> contrariwise, adds one missing #ifdef...
>> [1/8] sh_eth: remove #ifdef around EDSR and GECMR bit definitions
>> [2/8] sh_eth: use EDSR_ENALL to set EDSR
>> [3/8] sh_eth: remove duplicate sh_eth_set_duplex() definitions
>> [4/8] sh_eth: remove SH_ETH_HAS_TSU
>> [5/8] sh_eth: add IRQ flags to 'struct sh_eth_cpu_data'
>> [6/8] sh_eth: remove #ifdef around sh_eth_select_mii()
>> [7/8] sh_eth: consolidate sh_eth_reset()
>> [8/8] sh_eth: enclose PM code into #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> All applied, thanks.
Thanks to you for quick reaction.
> I think you should have two sets of const netdev_ops to cover the two
> cases, instead of writing to a non-const netdev_ops. Could you send a
> follow-on patch which does that?
Sigh, I told Iwamatsu-san to do it, but he failed to respin the
patches. OK, I'll look into it later, when I have time.
> Thanks.
WBR, Sergei
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] sh_eth: deal with #ifdef'fery
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:24:50 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B1D112.8030805@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130606.160504.85747659460186927.davem@davemloft.net>
Hello.
On 07-06-2013 3:05, David Miller wrote:
>> This series of 8 patches are against Dave's 'net-next.git' repository.
>> The series deals mostly with excess #ifdef'fery in the 'sh_eth' driver.
>> It doesn't yet get rid of all the #ifdef'fery but that's a matter of another
>> patchset. The last patch (it was almost in the middle of the series before),
>> contrariwise, adds one missing #ifdef...
>> [1/8] sh_eth: remove #ifdef around EDSR and GECMR bit definitions
>> [2/8] sh_eth: use EDSR_ENALL to set EDSR
>> [3/8] sh_eth: remove duplicate sh_eth_set_duplex() definitions
>> [4/8] sh_eth: remove SH_ETH_HAS_TSU
>> [5/8] sh_eth: add IRQ flags to 'struct sh_eth_cpu_data'
>> [6/8] sh_eth: remove #ifdef around sh_eth_select_mii()
>> [7/8] sh_eth: consolidate sh_eth_reset()
>> [8/8] sh_eth: enclose PM code into #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> All applied, thanks.
Thanks to you for quick reaction.
> I think you should have two sets of const netdev_ops to cover the two
> cases, instead of writing to a non-const netdev_ops. Could you send a
> follow-on patch which does that?
Sigh, I told Iwamatsu-san to do it, but he failed to respin the
patches. OK, I'll look into it later, when I have time.
> Thanks.
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-07 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-06 19:39 [PATCH v5 0/8] sh_eth: deal with #ifdef'fery Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-06 19:39 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-06 19:43 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] sh_eth: remove #ifdef around EDSR and GECMR bit definitions Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-06 19:43 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-06 19:44 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] sh_eth: use EDSR_ENALL to set EDSR Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-06 19:44 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-06 19:45 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] sh_eth: remove duplicate sh_eth_set_duplex() definitions Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-06 19:45 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-06 19:48 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] sh_eth: remove SH_ETH_HAS_TSU Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-06 19:48 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-06 19:49 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] sh_eth: add IRQ flags to 'struct sh_eth_cpu_data' Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-06 19:49 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-06 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] sh_eth: remove #ifdef around sh_eth_select_mii() Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-06 19:50 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-06 19:51 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] sh_eth: consolidate sh_eth_reset() Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-06 19:51 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-06 19:52 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] sh_eth: enclose PM code into #ifdef CONFIG_PM Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-06 19:52 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-06 23:05 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] sh_eth: deal with #ifdef'fery David Miller
2013-06-06 23:05 ` David Miller
2013-06-07 12:24 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2013-06-07 12:24 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B1D112.8030805@cogentembedded.com \
--to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.