All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
	Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 2/2] KVM: PPC: Add dummy kvm_arch_init_irq_routing()
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 18:33:20 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B2EC50.6040604@ozlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B2DC25.2030506@msgid.tls.msk.ru>

On 06/08/2013 05:24 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 06.06.2013 07:59, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
>>
>> The common KVM code insists on calling kvm_arch_init_irq_routing()
>> as soon as it sees kernel header support for it (regardless of whether
>> QEMU supports it).  Provide a dummy function to satisfy this.
>>
>> Unlike x86, PPC does not have one default irqchip, so there's no common
>> code that we'd stick here.  Even if you ignore the routes themselves,
>> which even on x86 are not set up in this function, the initial XICS
>> kernel implementation will not support IRQ routing, so it's best to
>> leave even the general feature flags up to the specific irqchip code.
> 
> As Scott Wood already pointed out, this should come in before the
> actual header update, which is no problem.  We'll have to deal
> with a new warning (-Wmissing-prototypes) which can be dealt with
> by wrapping this function into #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING .. #endif
> (I can add this).

Ah. I'll repost it early next week.

> 
> But how about other architectures?  Before, this function were only
> defined for x86, now it is defined for two arches - x86 and ppc.
> Aren't other arches need this as well?

Good point, will check (and fix if needed). Thanks!


-- 
Alexey


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
	Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 2/2] KVM: PPC: Add dummy kvm_arch_init_irq_routing()
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 18:33:20 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B2EC50.6040604@ozlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B2DC25.2030506@msgid.tls.msk.ru>

On 06/08/2013 05:24 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 06.06.2013 07:59, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
>>
>> The common KVM code insists on calling kvm_arch_init_irq_routing()
>> as soon as it sees kernel header support for it (regardless of whether
>> QEMU supports it).  Provide a dummy function to satisfy this.
>>
>> Unlike x86, PPC does not have one default irqchip, so there's no common
>> code that we'd stick here.  Even if you ignore the routes themselves,
>> which even on x86 are not set up in this function, the initial XICS
>> kernel implementation will not support IRQ routing, so it's best to
>> leave even the general feature flags up to the specific irqchip code.
> 
> As Scott Wood already pointed out, this should come in before the
> actual header update, which is no problem.  We'll have to deal
> with a new warning (-Wmissing-prototypes) which can be dealt with
> by wrapping this function into #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING .. #endif
> (I can add this).

Ah. I'll repost it early next week.

> 
> But how about other architectures?  Before, this function were only
> defined for x86, now it is defined for two arches - x86 and ppc.
> Aren't other arches need this as well?

Good point, will check (and fix if needed). Thanks!


-- 
Alexey

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-08  8:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-06  3:59 [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 0/2] header update request Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-06  3:59 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-06  3:59 ` [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 1/2] linux-headers: Update to v3.10-rc4 Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-06  3:59   ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-06  3:59 ` [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 2/2] KVM: PPC: Add dummy kvm_arch_init_irq_routing() Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-06  3:59   ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-06 15:59   ` [Qemu-trivial] " Scott Wood
2013-06-06 15:59     ` [Qemu-devel] " Scott Wood
2013-06-08  7:24   ` [Qemu-trivial] " Michael Tokarev
2013-06-08  7:24     ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Tokarev
2013-06-08  8:33     ` Alexey Kardashevskiy [this message]
2013-06-08  8:33       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2013-06-10 18:40     ` Scott Wood
2013-06-10 18:40       ` [Qemu-devel] " Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51B2EC50.6040604@ozlabs.ru \
    --to=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.