From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@us.ibm.com>
Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
imammedo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - Infrastructure for Cpu Devices
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 00:50:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B3B522.5060301@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370626087-840-8-git-send-email-jjherne@us.ibm.com>
Hi,
Am 07.06.2013 19:28, schrieb Jason J. Herne:
> From: "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@us.ibm.com>
>
> Add infrastructure for treating cpus as devices. This patch allows cpus to be
> specified using a combination of '-smp' and '-device cpu'. This approach
> forces a change in the way cpus are counted via smp_cpus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@us.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/hw/boards.h | 3 ++
> vl.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
This feels like an ugly hack. And nack to CPUS_ARE_DEVICES(), since all
CPUs are devices already.
Could you please give a bit more rationale for each change? What's the
intended use case here? This is not just an s390 change but a design
question, so again please CC me as CPU maintainer.
There's a number of questions that your series touches on but doesn't
discuss the concept in the cover letter or in the commit messages:
1) Mixing -smp N and -device s390-cpu
I would expect to get N+1 CPUs. Do you agree or disagree?
-smp 0 is probably not well tested, if at all, so why specify -device
s390-cpu on the command line at all? Of course if there's bugs I'll be
happy to accept fixes, but I'm seeing device_add as more relevant than
-device honestly.
2) QEMUMachine::max_cpus
I believe -device s390-cpu should honor the limit, do you agree?
If so, then there's no need to iterate over -device options, because
that'll miss hot-added devices, but instead move any checks to the CPU's
realize function. If a user creates more CPUs than
qom/cpu.c:cpu_common_realizefn() should be made to fail. Note that my
upcoming CPUState series moves qemu_init_vcpu() there, so we will be
able to bail out before creating vCPU threads etc. for that CPU.
3) vCPU initialization hooks
We already have a QEMUMachine::hot_add_cpu hook. If you need additional
hooks, I'd like to first understand why that cannot go into S390CPU's
realize function, and then we can think about a more generic solution
like adding a Notifier that anyone can use.
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-08 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 17:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - Define New SCLP Codes Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - SCLP CPU Info Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - SCLP Event integration Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - ipi_states enhancements Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - Introduce post-cpu-init function Jason J. Herne
2013-06-08 22:10 ` Andreas Färber
2013-06-10 15:28 ` Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - Storage key Global Access Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - Infrastructure for Cpu Devices Jason J. Herne
2013-06-08 22:50 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2013-06-10 16:00 ` Jason J. Herne
2013-07-30 7:59 ` Igor Mammedov
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - Treat S390 cpus as devices Jason J. Herne
2013-06-09 1:11 ` Andreas Färber
2013-06-10 9:02 ` Cornelia Huck
2013-06-10 16:49 ` Jason J. Herne
2013-07-29 19:41 ` Jason J. Herne
2013-07-30 7:24 ` Igor Mammedov
2013-07-30 14:27 ` Jason J. Herne
2013-07-30 14:50 ` Igor Mammedov
2013-07-30 14:58 ` Andreas Färber
2013-07-30 7:42 ` Igor Mammedov
2013-06-13 8:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B3B522.5060301@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@us.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.