From: "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
imammedo@redhat.com, "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - Introduce post-cpu-init function
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:28:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B5F0A7.8090908@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B3ABEA.6000503@suse.de>
On 06/08/2013 06:10 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 07.06.2013 19:28, schrieb Jason J. Herne:
>> From: "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@us.ibm.com>
>>
>> In preparation for treating cpus as devices
>
> CPUs *are* devices since multiple releases now, so this is badly put.
>
>> we need to separate machine
>> initialization into two stages:
>> 1. Initialization that needs to be done before cpu devices can be created.
>> 2. Initialization that requires cpu devices to already be created.
>>
>> This is accomplished by creating an optional post-cpu initialization function
>> for QEMUMachine.
>
> Whatever you are using it for, this sounds wrong to me.
>
The QEMUMachine->init() function (at least for S390) currently handles
several tasks. One of those tasks is the creation of cpus. If we are
switching to a new paradigm where QOM cpu devices are parsed and created
in main() then QEMUMachine->init() will happen either before or after
cpus are created. This change is meant to split QEMUMachine->init()
into two parts
1. Stuff that does not depend on cpu creation. Specifically, stuff that
might be a dependency of cpu create, like allocating ipi_states.
2. Stuff that does depend on cpu creation. Like
vm_s390_enable_css_support() which requires CPU 0 to exist.
> Machine init is supposed to use less code and more QOM infrastructure,
> with a future goal of replacing most code with a config file
> instantiating and wiring up devices.
>
Duly noted. I can have another look at the code. Perhaps there is an
easy place I can move the ipi_state initialization. Also, perhaps there
is a way to remove the cpu-0 dependency from
vm_s390_enable_css_support(). Both of these changes would remove the
need for the post_cpu_init function.
> And please don't forget to CC me on the next CPU series.
>
Sorry. I had meant to CC you originally.
--
-- Jason J. Herne (jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-10 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 17:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - Define New SCLP Codes Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - SCLP CPU Info Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - SCLP Event integration Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - ipi_states enhancements Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - Introduce post-cpu-init function Jason J. Herne
2013-06-08 22:10 ` Andreas Färber
2013-06-10 15:28 ` Jason J. Herne [this message]
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - Storage key Global Access Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - Infrastructure for Cpu Devices Jason J. Herne
2013-06-08 22:50 ` Andreas Färber
2013-06-10 16:00 ` Jason J. Herne
2013-07-30 7:59 ` Igor Mammedov
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - Treat S390 cpus as devices Jason J. Herne
2013-06-09 1:11 ` Andreas Färber
2013-06-10 9:02 ` Cornelia Huck
2013-06-10 16:49 ` Jason J. Herne
2013-07-29 19:41 ` Jason J. Herne
2013-07-30 7:24 ` Igor Mammedov
2013-07-30 14:27 ` Jason J. Herne
2013-07-30 14:50 ` Igor Mammedov
2013-07-30 14:58 ` Andreas Färber
2013-07-30 7:42 ` Igor Mammedov
2013-06-13 8:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B5F0A7.8090908@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@us.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.