All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: prevent warnings when allocating with __GFP_NOWARN
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:56:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B62F6B.8040308@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJsxLGDH2iwznRkP-iwiMZw7Ee3mirhjLvhShrWLHR0qguRxA@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/10/2013 03:31 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hello Sasha,
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> wrote:
>> slab would still spew a warning when a big allocation happens with the
>> __GFP_NOWARN fleg is set. Prevent that to conform to __GFP_NOWARN.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>   mm/slab_common.c | 4 +++-
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
>> index ff3218a..2d41450 100644
>> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
>> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
>> @@ -373,8 +373,10 @@ struct kmem_cache *kmalloc_slab(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
>>   {
>>          int index;
>>
>> -       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE))
>> +       if (size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE) {
>> +               WARN_ON_ONCE(!(flags & __GFP_NOWARN));
>>                  return NULL;
>> +       }
>
> Does this fix a real problem you're seeing? __GFP_NOWARN is about not
> warning if a memory allocation fails but this particular WARN_ON
> suggests a kernel bug.

It fixes this warning:

[ 1691.703002] WARNING: CPU: 15 PID: 21519 at mm/slab_common.c:376 
kmalloc_slab+0x2f/0xb0()
[ 1691.706906] can: request_module (can-proto-4) failed.
[ 1691.707827] mpoa: proc_mpc_write: could not parse ''
[ 1691.713952] Modules linked in:
[ 1691.715199] CPU: 15 PID: 21519 Comm: trinity-child15 Tainted: G 
   W    3.10.0-rc4-next-20130607-sasha-00011-gcd78395-dirty #2
[ 1691.719669]  0000000000000009 ffff880020a95e30 ffffffff83ff4041 
0000000000000000
[ 1691.797744]  ffff880020a95e68 ffffffff8111fe12 fffffffffffffff0 
00000000000082d0
[ 1691.802822]  0000000000080000 0000000000080000 0000000001400000 
ffff880020a95e78
[ 1691.807621] Call Trace:
[ 1691.809473]  [<ffffffff83ff4041>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x82
[ 1691.812783]  [<ffffffff8111fe12>] warn_slowpath_common+0x82/0xb0
[ 1691.817011]  [<ffffffff8111fe55>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20
[ 1691.819936]  [<ffffffff81243dcf>] kmalloc_slab+0x2f/0xb0
[ 1691.824942]  [<ffffffff81278d54>] __kmalloc+0x24/0x4b0
[ 1691.827285]  [<ffffffff8196ffe3>] ? security_capable+0x13/0x20
[ 1691.829405]  [<ffffffff812a26b7>] ? pipe_fcntl+0x107/0x210
[ 1691.831827]  [<ffffffff812a26b7>] pipe_fcntl+0x107/0x210
[ 1691.833651]  [<ffffffff812b7ea0>] ? fget_raw_light+0x130/0x3f0
[ 1691.835343]  [<ffffffff812aa5fb>] SyS_fcntl+0x60b/0x6a0
[ 1691.837008]  [<ffffffff8403ca98>] tracesys+0xe1/0xe6

The caller specifically sets __GFP_NOWARN presumably to avoid this 
warning on slub but I'm not sure if there's any other reason.


Thanks,
Sasha

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: prevent warnings when allocating with __GFP_NOWARN
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:56:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B62F6B.8040308@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJsxLGDH2iwznRkP-iwiMZw7Ee3mirhjLvhShrWLHR0qguRxA@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/10/2013 03:31 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hello Sasha,
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> wrote:
>> slab would still spew a warning when a big allocation happens with the
>> __GFP_NOWARN fleg is set. Prevent that to conform to __GFP_NOWARN.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>   mm/slab_common.c | 4 +++-
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
>> index ff3218a..2d41450 100644
>> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
>> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
>> @@ -373,8 +373,10 @@ struct kmem_cache *kmalloc_slab(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
>>   {
>>          int index;
>>
>> -       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE))
>> +       if (size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE) {
>> +               WARN_ON_ONCE(!(flags & __GFP_NOWARN));
>>                  return NULL;
>> +       }
>
> Does this fix a real problem you're seeing? __GFP_NOWARN is about not
> warning if a memory allocation fails but this particular WARN_ON
> suggests a kernel bug.

It fixes this warning:

[ 1691.703002] WARNING: CPU: 15 PID: 21519 at mm/slab_common.c:376 
kmalloc_slab+0x2f/0xb0()
[ 1691.706906] can: request_module (can-proto-4) failed.
[ 1691.707827] mpoa: proc_mpc_write: could not parse ''
[ 1691.713952] Modules linked in:
[ 1691.715199] CPU: 15 PID: 21519 Comm: trinity-child15 Tainted: G 
   W    3.10.0-rc4-next-20130607-sasha-00011-gcd78395-dirty #2
[ 1691.719669]  0000000000000009 ffff880020a95e30 ffffffff83ff4041 
0000000000000000
[ 1691.797744]  ffff880020a95e68 ffffffff8111fe12 fffffffffffffff0 
00000000000082d0
[ 1691.802822]  0000000000080000 0000000000080000 0000000001400000 
ffff880020a95e78
[ 1691.807621] Call Trace:
[ 1691.809473]  [<ffffffff83ff4041>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x82
[ 1691.812783]  [<ffffffff8111fe12>] warn_slowpath_common+0x82/0xb0
[ 1691.817011]  [<ffffffff8111fe55>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20
[ 1691.819936]  [<ffffffff81243dcf>] kmalloc_slab+0x2f/0xb0
[ 1691.824942]  [<ffffffff81278d54>] __kmalloc+0x24/0x4b0
[ 1691.827285]  [<ffffffff8196ffe3>] ? security_capable+0x13/0x20
[ 1691.829405]  [<ffffffff812a26b7>] ? pipe_fcntl+0x107/0x210
[ 1691.831827]  [<ffffffff812a26b7>] pipe_fcntl+0x107/0x210
[ 1691.833651]  [<ffffffff812b7ea0>] ? fget_raw_light+0x130/0x3f0
[ 1691.835343]  [<ffffffff812aa5fb>] SyS_fcntl+0x60b/0x6a0
[ 1691.837008]  [<ffffffff8403ca98>] tracesys+0xe1/0xe6

The caller specifically sets __GFP_NOWARN presumably to avoid this 
warning on slub but I'm not sure if there's any other reason.


Thanks,
Sasha

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-10 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-10 19:18 [PATCH] slab: prevent warnings when allocating with __GFP_NOWARN Sasha Levin
2013-06-10 19:18 ` Sasha Levin
2013-06-10 19:31 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-06-10 19:31   ` Pekka Enberg
2013-06-10 19:56   ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2013-06-10 19:56     ` Sasha Levin
2013-06-10 23:40     ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-10 23:40       ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-11  0:54       ` Sasha Levin
2013-06-11  0:54         ` Sasha Levin
2013-06-11  6:28         ` Pekka Enberg
2013-06-11  6:28           ` Pekka Enberg
2013-06-11 13:16           ` Sasha Levin
2013-06-11 13:16             ` Sasha Levin
2013-06-11 15:14             ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-11 15:14               ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-11 15:16               ` Pekka Enberg
2013-06-11 15:16                 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-06-11 15:23                 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-11 15:23                   ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-11 15:44                   ` Sasha Levin
2013-06-11 15:44                     ` Sasha Levin
2013-06-11 16:13                     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-11 16:13                       ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-11 16:19                       ` Sasha Levin
2013-06-11 16:19                         ` Sasha Levin
2013-06-11 16:37                         ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-11 16:37                           ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-11 16:43                           ` Dave Jones
2013-06-11 16:43                             ` Dave Jones
2013-06-11 19:02                           ` Sasha Levin
2013-06-11 19:02                             ` Sasha Levin
2013-06-12 13:01                           ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-12 13:01                             ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-11 16:28                       ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-11 16:28                         ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-11 22:34                 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-11 22:34                   ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-13  7:03                   ` Pekka Enberg
2013-06-13  7:03                     ` Pekka Enberg
2013-06-11 22:10               ` David Rientjes
2013-06-11 22:10                 ` David Rientjes
2013-06-11 15:08         ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-11 15:08           ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51B62F6B.8040308@oracle.com \
    --to=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.