From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "Shin, Jacob" <Jacob.Shin@amd.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
"Hurwitz, Sherry" <sherry.hurwitz@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v5] iommu/amd: Fix logic for clearing the IOMMU interrupt bits
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 20:44:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B923F1.7000802@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B8F814.70202@amd.com>
On 6/12/2013 5:37 PM, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> On 6/12/2013 1:24 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> If more entries are added to the event log during the time that event
>>> log interrupt is disabled (in the control register),
>>> the IOMMU hardware will generate interrupt once the the interrupt
>>> enable
>>> bit in the control register changes from 0 to 1 and set the status
>>> register. Since the "iommu_interrupt_handler" code is already calling
>>> "schedule_tasklet", we should not need to "re-schedule" tasklet here.
>>> I have confirmed the hardware behavior described with the hardware
>>> designer. This is also the same on the PPR log.
>> And also the same between v1 and v2 hardware? Again, I'd like to
>> be on the safe side, and rather do a reschedule too much than one
>> too little. And in any case, having your documentation made more
>> precise in these respects would be much appreciated.
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
> Understand. I apologize if the AMD IOMMU specification does not
> describe the behavior quite clearly. Let me know if I could help
> clarifing any issues with the hardware designers.
>
> Since we are modifying the IOMMU interrupt enabling/disabling, I have
> been doing some more testing on the IOMMU interrupt handling. I found
> that IOMMU MSI interrupt is currently broken, but I think this is
> because of some older changes. I am still tracking down the issue,
> and will update my findings.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Suravee
The following commit broke the IOMMU MSI interrupt:
2012-11-28 899110e3f6d2a191638e8b50a981c551eeec49e6 AMD IOMMU:
include IOMMU interrupt information in 'M' debug key output
(http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=899110e3f6d2a191638e8b50a981c551eeec49e6)
This patch also need the following patch to resolve kernel panic:
c759fee45bf44f2947a3480d54c03ff7e028c39e AMD IOMMU: add locking missing
from c/s 26198:ba90ecb0231f
(http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=c759fee45bf44f2947a3480d54c03ff7e028c39e)
I'll update once I root cause the issue.
Suravee
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-13 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-10 5:05 [PATCH 1/2 V2] iommu/amd: Fix logic for clearing the IOMMU interrupt bits suravee.suthikulpanit
2013-06-10 5:05 ` [PATCH 2/2 V2] iommu/amd: Workaround for erratum 787 suravee.suthikulpanit
2013-06-10 9:35 ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-10 9:47 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 10:40 ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-10 10:53 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 12:43 ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-10 13:23 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 13:41 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 13:56 ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-10 13:55 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 15:03 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 16:31 ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-10 23:13 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-11 6:45 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 6:40 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 8:53 ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-10 13:53 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-10 13:59 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 15:11 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-10 15:21 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 10:59 ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] " Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 6:47 ` [PATCH 2/2 v5] " Jan Beulich
2013-06-17 18:57 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-10 10:05 ` [PATCH 1/2 V2] iommu/amd: Fix logic for clearing the IOMMU interrupt bits Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 10:56 ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] " Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 11:02 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 12:18 ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-10 12:31 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 13:58 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-10 12:41 ` [PATCH 1/2 v4] " Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 12:46 ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-10 13:49 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-10 14:08 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 6:47 ` [PATCH 1/2 v5] " Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 23:03 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-12 6:24 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 22:37 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-06-13 1:44 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit [this message]
2013-06-13 7:54 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-13 13:48 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-06-13 14:20 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-13 14:30 ` Processed: " xen
2013-06-13 15:58 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-13 16:34 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-14 6:27 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-14 6:40 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-14 7:14 ` [PATCH] AMD IOMMU: make interrupt work again Jan Beulich
2013-06-14 16:10 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-17 18:59 ` [PATCH 1/2 v5] iommu/amd: Fix logic for clearing the IOMMU interrupt bits Suravee Suthikulanit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B923F1.7000802@amd.com \
--to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Jacob.Shin@amd.com \
--cc=sherry.hurwitz@amd.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.