All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
To: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: btrfs-progs and btrfs code similar why ?
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:56:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B942E3.8000701@oracle.com> (raw)



   Per wiki an idea seems to maintain same code (probably
   as much as possible) between btrfs-progs and btrfs

   There must have been a/few critical advantage, but
   what are they ?

Thanks, Anand



             reply	other threads:[~2013-06-13  3:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-13  3:56 Anand Jain [this message]
2013-06-13  4:44 ` btrfs-progs and btrfs code similar why ? Eric Sandeen
2013-06-14  1:53   ` Anand Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51B942E3.8000701@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.