Re: [RFC v1] MFD: Change TWL6025 references to TWL6032

[Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk@ti.com>]

On 06/07/2013 05:44 PM, gg@slimlogic.co.uk wrote:
> On 2013-06-07 15:36, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:53:10PM +0300, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote:
>>> From: Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>
>>>
>>> The TWL6025 was never released beyond sample form and was replaced by
>>> the PhoenixLite range of chips - TWL6032. Change the references to
>>> reference the TWL6032 class and name the registers to twl6032 in 
>>> line with
>>> an actual released chip name to avoid confusion.
>>>
>>> Currently there is no users of TWL6025 in the code.
>>
>> Given that the chip exists even if not widely distributed it seems as
>> well to keep the twl6025 references in there at least in the device ID
>> table - it won't do any harm to people using the twl6032 name and might
>> help someone who happens to pick up an old board for whatever reason.
>
> I do not think any "old boards" exist, it really was a limited run!
>
> Graeme
>
Hello Mark, Graeme,

Taking in account that:
- there is no hardware to test twl6025, testing is not possible;
- there is no documentation for twl6025, and if there are any changes to 
twl6032 is not known;
- twl6032 is available, and in production, twl6025 is not even found on 
ti.com 
<https://emea.mail.ti.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=Lmz99OgekUScv9U89hUFHXTz_mebO9AIdxDOPBzqDKKuqB_Dr5dpU_Sl2criZoxOeMxW4IqmDOA.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fti.com>

So, what do you think, can this change be accepted?

// I apologize for sending previous email as personal, not to mail list.