From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] Delay initializing of large sections of memory
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:19:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C4C356.3040602@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQVsNk0rjde8YQd_Bxvo8GFcpDoTeVRgvOMA8DVwhYO4kw@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/21/2013 11:36 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> wrote:
>> This rfc patch set delays initializing large sections of memory until we have
>> started cpus. This has the effect of reducing startup times on large memory
>> systems. On 16TB it can take over an hour to boot and most of that time
>> is spent initializing memory.
>
> One hour on system with 16T ram? BIOS or OS?
The BIOS is about 20 minutes *before* the 1+ hour. (When we started this
UV project way back when, 8TB took over 4 hours before we threw in the towel.)
>
> I use wall clock to check bootime on one system with 3T and 16 pcie cards,
> Linus only takes about 3m and 30 seconds from bootloader.
I can send some stats on where various delays are but most of it was in
memory initialization. On average UV nodes carry 128 or 256G per node,
so 12 nodes would take about 3 or 4 minutes, perhaps more.
>
> wonder if you boot delay is with so many cpu get onlined in serialized mode.
Nope. If that was the case, delaying memory but initializing all the
cpus would not affect the time.
>
> so can you try boot your system with "maxcpus=128" to get the boot time with
> wall clock ?
We could try if you really think it will provide any useful info. Not sure
exactly how having memory on nodes with no active cpus will react.
>
> Thanks
>
> Yinghai
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-21 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-21 16:25 [RFC 0/2] Delay initializing of large sections of memory Nathan Zimmer
2013-06-21 16:25 ` [RFC 1/2] x86_64, mm: Delay initializing large portion " Nathan Zimmer
2013-06-25 4:14 ` Rob Landley
2013-06-21 16:25 ` [RFC 2/2] x86_64, mm: Reinsert the absent memory Nathan Zimmer
2013-06-23 9:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-23 9:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-24 17:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-24 19:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-24 20:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-25 7:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-24 20:36 ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-06-25 7:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-25 15:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-25 17:19 ` Mike Travis
2013-06-25 17:22 ` Mike Travis
2013-06-25 18:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-25 18:51 ` Mike Travis
2013-06-26 9:22 ` [RFC] Transparent on-demand memory setup initialization embedded in the (GFP) buddy allocator Ingo Molnar
2013-06-26 13:28 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-26 13:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-26 15:02 ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-06-26 16:15 ` Mike Travis
2013-06-26 12:14 ` [RFC 2/2] x86_64, mm: Reinsert the absent memory Ingo Molnar
2013-06-26 14:49 ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-06-26 15:12 ` Dave Hansen
2013-06-26 15:20 ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-06-26 15:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-26 16:11 ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-06-26 16:07 ` Mike Travis
2013-06-21 16:51 ` [RFC 0/2] Delay initializing of large sections of memory Greg KH
2013-06-21 17:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-21 17:18 ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-06-21 17:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-21 20:05 ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-06-21 20:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-21 20:33 ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-06-21 21:36 ` Mike Travis
2013-06-21 21:07 ` Mike Travis
2013-06-21 18:44 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-21 18:50 ` Greg KH
2013-06-21 19:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-21 19:19 ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-06-21 20:28 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-21 20:40 ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-06-21 21:30 ` Mike Travis
2013-06-22 0:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-25 17:35 ` Mike Travis
2013-06-25 18:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-25 18:40 ` Mike Travis
2013-06-25 18:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-25 18:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-25 18:58 ` Mike Travis
2013-06-25 19:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-25 19:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-25 19:28 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-27 6:37 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-27 11:05 ` Robin Holt
2013-06-27 15:50 ` Mike Travis
2013-06-26 9:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-25 18:38 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-25 18:42 ` Mike Travis
2013-06-21 18:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-21 18:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-06-21 19:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-21 21:28 ` Mike Travis
2013-06-21 21:19 ` Mike Travis [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C4C356.3040602@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nzimmer@sgi.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.