From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: Jack Wang <xjtuwjp@gmail.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@parallels.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
jiang.liu@huawei.com, lindar_liu@usish.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] scsi/pm8001: use pdev->pm_cap instead of pci_find_capability(..,PCI_CAP_ID_PM)
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:46:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51CAB867.9000001@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51CAB55D.5070508@gmail.com>
On 2013/6/26 17:33, Jack Wang wrote:
> On 06/18/2013 10:23 AM, Yijing Wang wrote:
>> Pci core has been saved pm cap register offset by pdev->pm_cap in pci_pm_init()
>> in init path. So we can use pdev->pm_cap instead of using
>> pci_find_capability(pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_PM) for better performance and simplified code.
>>
> I think Lindar already replied to you, and tested it on hardware.
I didn't receive the reply, I will check my email client, maybe I lose some emails.
Jack, Lindar thank you very much.
>
> So you can add her:
> Acked-by or Tested-by
ok, I will add them.
>
>
> Regards,
> Jack
>> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
>> Cc: xjtuwjp@gmail.com
>> Cc: lindar_liu@usish.com
>> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@parallels.com>
>> Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c | 7 +++----
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
>> index e4b9bc7..3861aa1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
>> @@ -912,14 +912,13 @@ static int pm8001_pci_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
>> {
>> struct sas_ha_struct *sha = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha;
>> - int i , pos;
>> + int i;
>> u32 device_state;
>> pm8001_ha = sha->lldd_ha;
>> flush_workqueue(pm8001_wq);
>> scsi_block_requests(pm8001_ha->shost);
>> - pos = pci_find_capability(pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_PM);
>> - if (pos == 0) {
>> - printk(KERN_ERR " PCI PM not supported\n");
>> + if (!pdev->pm_cap) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, " PCI PM not supported\n");
>> return -ENODEV;
>> }
>> PM8001_CHIP_DISP->interrupt_disable(pm8001_ha, 0xFF);
>>
>
>
> .
>
--
Thanks!
Yijing
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: Jack Wang <xjtuwjp@gmail.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@parallels.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
<jiang.liu@huawei.com>, <lindar_liu@usish.com>,
<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] scsi/pm8001: use pdev->pm_cap instead of pci_find_capability(..,PCI_CAP_ID_PM)
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:46:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51CAB867.9000001@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51CAB55D.5070508@gmail.com>
On 2013/6/26 17:33, Jack Wang wrote:
> On 06/18/2013 10:23 AM, Yijing Wang wrote:
>> Pci core has been saved pm cap register offset by pdev->pm_cap in pci_pm_init()
>> in init path. So we can use pdev->pm_cap instead of using
>> pci_find_capability(pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_PM) for better performance and simplified code.
>>
> I think Lindar already replied to you, and tested it on hardware.
I didn't receive the reply, I will check my email client, maybe I lose some emails.
Jack, Lindar thank you very much.
>
> So you can add her:
> Acked-by or Tested-by
ok, I will add them.
>
>
> Regards,
> Jack
>> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
>> Cc: xjtuwjp@gmail.com
>> Cc: lindar_liu@usish.com
>> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@parallels.com>
>> Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c | 7 +++----
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
>> index e4b9bc7..3861aa1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
>> @@ -912,14 +912,13 @@ static int pm8001_pci_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
>> {
>> struct sas_ha_struct *sha = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha;
>> - int i , pos;
>> + int i;
>> u32 device_state;
>> pm8001_ha = sha->lldd_ha;
>> flush_workqueue(pm8001_wq);
>> scsi_block_requests(pm8001_ha->shost);
>> - pos = pci_find_capability(pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_PM);
>> - if (pos == 0) {
>> - printk(KERN_ERR " PCI PM not supported\n");
>> + if (!pdev->pm_cap) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, " PCI PM not supported\n");
>> return -ENODEV;
>> }
>> PM8001_CHIP_DISP->interrupt_disable(pm8001_ha, 0xFF);
>>
>
>
> .
>
--
Thanks!
Yijing
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-26 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-18 8:23 [PATCH 8/9] scsi/pm8001: use pdev->pm_cap instead of pci_find_capability(..,PCI_CAP_ID_PM) Yijing Wang
2013-06-18 8:23 ` Yijing Wang
2013-06-18 9:25 ` lindar_liu
2013-06-18 9:25 ` lindar_liu
2013-06-25 12:07 ` Yijing Wang
2013-06-25 12:07 ` Yijing Wang
2013-06-26 9:33 ` Jack Wang
2013-06-26 9:46 ` Yijing Wang [this message]
2013-06-26 9:46 ` Yijing Wang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-06-26 1:13 Yijing Wang
2013-06-26 1:13 ` Yijing Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51CAB867.9000001@huawei.com \
--to=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=lindar_liu@usish.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xjtuwjp@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.