From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
rob.herring@calxeda.com, grant.likely@linaro.org,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: dt: bindings: TI WiLink modules
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:56:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51CC98E6.1020104@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372362418.21065.25.camel@cumari.coelho.fi>
On 06/27/2013 02:46 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 14:12 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
[...]
>> Indexes to another entity is always a maintenance burden in the longer
>> run and needs judicious control. If it is possible to avoid it by
>> selecting the right parameters, I am a hard advocate for the same.
>
> I tend to agree. But you need a balance. In theory you're right. But
> I think if you take the real world example, it is over-engineering.
>
> Anyway, if you *really* think this needs to be changed, I think we're in
> a deadlock here and I'd like to hear other people's opinions. I don't
> mind making the change, but I'm still not convinced it is worth it,
> since it just adds complexity.
>
> And hey, this is too much bikeshedding for such a small detail.
Lol :)
Alrite, if no one else is complaining, I am not going to block it either.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
Cc: <grant.likely@linaro.org>, <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: dt: bindings: TI WiLink modules
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:56:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51CC98E6.1020104@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372362418.21065.25.camel@cumari.coelho.fi>
On 06/27/2013 02:46 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 14:12 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
[...]
>> Indexes to another entity is always a maintenance burden in the longer
>> run and needs judicious control. If it is possible to avoid it by
>> selecting the right parameters, I am a hard advocate for the same.
>
> I tend to agree. But you need a balance. In theory you're right. But
> I think if you take the real world example, it is over-engineering.
>
> Anyway, if you *really* think this needs to be changed, I think we're in
> a deadlock here and I'd like to hear other people's opinions. I don't
> mind making the change, but I'm still not convinced it is worth it,
> since it just adds complexity.
>
> And hey, this is too much bikeshedding for such a small detail.
Lol :)
Alrite, if no one else is complaining, I am not going to block it either.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: nm@ti.com (Nishanth Menon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: dt: bindings: TI WiLink modules
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:56:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51CC98E6.1020104@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372362418.21065.25.camel@cumari.coelho.fi>
On 06/27/2013 02:46 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 14:12 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
[...]
>> Indexes to another entity is always a maintenance burden in the longer
>> run and needs judicious control. If it is possible to avoid it by
>> selecting the right parameters, I am a hard advocate for the same.
>
> I tend to agree. But you need a balance. In theory you're right. But
> I think if you take the real world example, it is over-engineering.
>
> Anyway, if you *really* think this needs to be changed, I think we're in
> a deadlock here and I'd like to hear other people's opinions. I don't
> mind making the change, but I'm still not convinced it is worth it,
> since it just adds complexity.
>
> And hey, this is too much bikeshedding for such a small detail.
Lol :)
Alrite, if no one else is complaining, I am not going to block it either.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-27 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-25 8:35 [PATCH] Documentation: dt: bindings: TI WiLink modules Luciano Coelho
2013-06-25 8:35 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-25 11:12 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-25 11:12 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-25 11:56 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-25 11:56 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-25 13:07 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-25 13:07 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-25 19:35 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-25 19:35 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-25 19:37 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-25 19:37 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-25 19:37 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-26 6:24 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-06-26 6:24 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-06-26 8:13 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-26 8:13 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-26 8:13 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-26 8:22 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-06-26 8:22 ` Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <51CBC1C8.1040301@gmail.com>
2013-06-27 8:47 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-27 8:47 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-27 12:51 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-06-27 12:51 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-06-27 12:58 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-27 12:58 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-27 13:15 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-06-27 13:19 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-27 13:19 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-27 13:23 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-06-27 13:23 ` Nishanth Menon
[not found] ` <51CC3CEE.3050004-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-27 13:30 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-27 13:30 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-27 13:39 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-06-27 13:39 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-06-27 18:51 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-27 18:51 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-27 18:51 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-27 19:12 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-06-27 19:12 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-06-27 19:12 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-06-27 19:46 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-27 19:46 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-27 19:46 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-27 19:56 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2013-06-27 19:56 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-06-27 19:56 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-06-28 9:38 ` Mark Rutland
2013-06-28 9:53 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-28 10:33 ` Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <1372413215.21065.41.camel-eHkr6bJ9aPyyenC2BZ5AVw@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-28 10:21 ` Mark Rutland
2013-06-28 10:21 ` Mark Rutland
2013-06-28 10:31 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-28 10:31 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-28 11:22 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-28 11:22 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-28 11:22 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-28 11:41 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-28 11:41 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-28 11:41 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-28 12:13 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-28 12:13 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-28 12:13 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-28 12:18 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-28 12:18 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-28 12:18 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20130628121859.GP11297-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-28 13:21 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-28 13:21 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-28 13:21 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-01 12:39 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-01 12:39 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-01 12:39 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-17 23:58 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-17 23:58 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-07-20 7:48 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-20 7:48 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-20 7:48 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-06-28 10:39 ` Mark Rutland
2013-06-28 10:39 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51CC98E6.1020104@ti.com \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=coelho@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.