Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mtd:nand:omap2: clean-up BCHx_HW and BCHx_SW ECC configurations in device_probe

[Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>]

On 7/2/2013 9:44 AM, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
>>>> This does not apply to l2-mtd.git, could you please re-base?
>>>>
>>> [Pekon]: rebased to l2-mtd.git
>>> - updated [Patch 3/4] which conflicted with commit '26331c04' which
>> touched omap2.c.
>>> - Please ignore [Patch 4/4] as it’s a DT update, which adds on top of Benoit's
>> tree (which has NAND node commits too).
>> If you need one patch (DT patch) in the series to be merged in another
>> repository (DT maintainer tree) then separate out that patch as separate
>> series and mention the dependency or need ack from the driver maintainer
>> so that both maintainer can apply the whole series into his repository
>> instead of applying partially here and there.
>>
> Agree. Yes, I should have sent the DT patch separately.
> But I posted all changes as part of single series, as its easy for users to
> Test and Ack them.
> Similarly patches for GPMC (Tony's tree) and NAND (Artem's tree) are
> functionally coupled, So at times I have to send them as part of same series.
> However, I'll clearly mention that in my cover-letter for future patches.
> Thanks for feedback ..
>
>
In that case you can publish your testing branch to a public repo and point to
that repo in your cover letter so that someone who wants to test can test
from your repo which has all dependent patches.

Regards
Mugunthan V N