From: coelho@ti.com (Luciano Coelho)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] clk: export __clk_get_flags for modular clock providers
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 23:45:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D5DEE7.2070400@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366009186-32199-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Hi,
On 04/15/2013 09:59 AM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> The common clock api provides some helpers for clk-providers but does
> not export these helpers. This hinders clk-providers to be built as modules.
> This patch adds __clk_get_flags() to the list of exported symbols.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
> ---
> Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index ed87b24..3e478b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -450,6 +450,7 @@ unsigned long __clk_get_flags(struct clk *clk)
> {
> return !clk ? 0 : clk->flags;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__clk_get_flags);
>
> bool __clk_is_enabled(struct clk *clk)
> {
>
I think this got merged slightly wrong. The EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL macro
came under clk_unprepare_unused_subtree() instead of under
__clk_get_flags():
Of course this is not that important, but it's a bit confusing when you
look at the code.
--
Cheers,
Luca.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] clk: export __clk_get_flags for modular clock providers
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 23:45:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D5DEE7.2070400@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366009186-32199-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Hi,
On 04/15/2013 09:59 AM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> The common clock api provides some helpers for clk-providers but does
> not export these helpers. This hinders clk-providers to be built as modules.
> This patch adds __clk_get_flags() to the list of exported symbols.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
> ---
> Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index ed87b24..3e478b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -450,6 +450,7 @@ unsigned long __clk_get_flags(struct clk *clk)
> {
> return !clk ? 0 : clk->flags;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__clk_get_flags);
>
> bool __clk_is_enabled(struct clk *clk)
> {
>
I think this got merged slightly wrong. The EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL macro
came under clk_unprepare_unused_subtree() instead of under
__clk_get_flags():
Of course this is not that important, but it's a bit confusing when you
look at the code.
--
Cheers,
Luca.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-04 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-15 6:59 [PATCH RESEND] clk: export __clk_get_flags for modular clock providers Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-04-15 6:59 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-07-04 20:45 ` Luciano Coelho [this message]
2013-07-04 20:45 ` Luciano Coelho
2013-07-30 23:03 ` Mike Turquette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51D5DEE7.2070400@ti.com \
--to=coelho@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.