All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, otavio@ossystems.com.br,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] iio: mxs-lradc: Remove useless check in read_raw
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 10:36:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D7E504.9010506@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372886714-25456-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de>

On 07/03/2013 10:25 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The removed check in the read_raw implementation was always true,
> therefore remove it. This also fixes a bug, by closely inspecting
> the code, one can notice the iio_validate_scan_mask_onehot() will
> always return 1 and therefore the subsequent condition will always
> succeed, therefore making the mxs_lradc_read_raw() function always
> return -EINVAL; .
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git.

Thanks,
> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c |    7 -------
>  1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> 
> V2: Update the patch description, by discussion on the ML, we found
>     out this accidentally fixes a bug.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> index d92c97a..c318eb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> @@ -234,7 +234,6 @@ static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>  {
>  	struct mxs_lradc *lradc = iio_priv(iio_dev);
>  	int ret;
> -	unsigned long mask;
>  
>  	if (m != IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -243,12 +242,6 @@ static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>  	if (chan->channel > LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	/* Validate the channel if it doesn't intersect with reserved chans. */
> -	bitmap_set(&mask, chan->channel, 1);
> -	ret = iio_validate_scan_mask_onehot(iio_dev, &mask);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * See if there is no buffered operation in progess. If there is, simply
>  	 * bail out. This can be improved to support both buffered and raw IO at
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-06  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-03 21:25 [PATCH V2] iio: mxs-lradc: Remove useless check in read_raw Marek Vasut
2013-07-04 20:22 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-07-05  8:36   ` Hector Palacios
2013-07-06  9:36 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51D7E504.9010506@kernel.org \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.