Re: [RFC] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add pinctrl handling

[Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>]

Hi Linus,

On 07/10/2013 11:36 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Grygorii Strashko
> <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote:
>
>> I think, In the future the OMAP pinctrl configurations would be manged in
>> more flexible way then now (thanks to "pinctrl PM helpers" and you;))
>> - "Idle" state will be splitted to "Idle"/"sleep"
>> - "default" state will be splitted to "default"/"active"
>
> OK so the first ones we already have so the discussion is now down
> to adding the "active" state (and pinctrl_pm* helper function).
>
> I guess we need a patch set prepared which adds the "active" state
> and helper function as the first patch, i.e. this:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137094012703340&w=2
> Can I have your ACK on this patch?
I've verified combination of
[PATCH] drivers: pinctrl: add active state to core
[RFC] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add pinctrl handling
on OMAP4 SDP board+UARTs and going to send patches on Monday.

So, Acked/Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
(I can't reply directly to thread - not signed to those lists :))

What is the best branch to base my patches on?

>
> I do not want to add the state unless there is a clear consumer,
> so it needs to go in with the first patch to a device driver that uses
> pinctrl_pm_select_active_state() which will be a good demonstration
> on its use and utility. (And a point to object and suggest other ways
> to do the same thing...)
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>

Regards,
-grygorii