Re: [PATCH] sched: smart wake-affine

[Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On 07/15/2013 01:57 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
[snip]
>>>
>>> And if it is possible, comparison based on the same basement will be
>>> better :)
>>
>> I have done some tests with reaim high_systime workfile, and I could not
>> find regression on my box (the tool itself has some issue, but I got the
>> results), v3 works well.
> 
> Sorry for the delay. I'm glad you reminded me since I already had the
> data.
>>
>> I suppose the issue have been addressed, but please let us know if v3
>> also show regression on your box, we could try to solve the problem ;-)
> 
> It has, high_systime no longer shows a hit and all workloads remain
> basically the same.
> 
> Tested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>

Thanks for the testing, I think we could go ahead now ;-)

Regards,
Michael Wang

> 
> Thanks.
> 
>>
>> Regards,
>> Michael Wang
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Michael Wang
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Davidlohr
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>