From: Hein Tibosch <hein_tibosch-mRCrAkd8dF0@public.gmane.org>
To: balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-omap: always send stop after nack
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:33:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E5137B.7000302@yahoo.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130716090300.GG8880-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
On 7/16/2013 5:03 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 04:19:35PM +0800, Hein Tibosch wrote:
>> Hi Vikram,
>>
>> On a OMAP4460, i2c-bus-3:
>>
>> A driver (lm75) is causing many 'timeout waiting for bus ready' errors.
>> SDA remains high (as it should), but SCL remains low after a NACK.
>> The bus becomes _unusable for other clients_.
>>
>> While probing, "lm75" writes a command, followed by a read + stop,
>> but the write command is NACK'd. The chip does accept other writes/reads,
>> it just refuses to ack invalid commands.
>>
>> Can you tell me if the patch below would make any sense? Or is it the
>> responsibility of the client to reset the i2c_smbus?
> patch below breaks repeated start.
Hi,
No, after the NACK, no more commands are being processed,
including a repeated start. omap_i2c_xfer() returns -EREMOTEIO
without ever freeing the bus.
The bus is left in an impossible state with SCL constantly low
and all next commands (to different chips) will therefore get
a -ETIMEDOUT
With this patch, the bus will become idle again and new commands
can be processed normally
Hein
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hein Tibosch <hein_tibosch@yahoo.es>
To: balbi@ti.com
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-omap: always send stop after nack
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:33:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E5137B.7000302@yahoo.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130716090300.GG8880@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
On 7/16/2013 5:03 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 04:19:35PM +0800, Hein Tibosch wrote:
>> Hi Vikram,
>>
>> On a OMAP4460, i2c-bus-3:
>>
>> A driver (lm75) is causing many 'timeout waiting for bus ready' errors.
>> SDA remains high (as it should), but SCL remains low after a NACK.
>> The bus becomes _unusable for other clients_.
>>
>> While probing, "lm75" writes a command, followed by a read + stop,
>> but the write command is NACK'd. The chip does accept other writes/reads,
>> it just refuses to ack invalid commands.
>>
>> Can you tell me if the patch below would make any sense? Or is it the
>> responsibility of the client to reset the i2c_smbus?
> patch below breaks repeated start.
Hi,
No, after the NACK, no more commands are being processed,
including a repeated start. omap_i2c_xfer() returns -EREMOTEIO
without ever freeing the bus.
The bus is left in an impossible state with SCL constantly low
and all next commands (to different chips) will therefore get
a -ETIMEDOUT
With this patch, the bus will become idle again and new commands
can be processed normally
Hein
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-16 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-16 8:19 [PATCH] i2c-omap: always send stop after nack Hein Tibosch
2013-07-16 9:03 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20130716090300.GG8880-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-16 9:33 ` Hein Tibosch [this message]
2013-07-16 9:33 ` Hein Tibosch
2013-07-16 9:42 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-16 9:42 ` Felipe Balbi
[not found] ` <20130716094212.GL8880-S8G//mZuvNWo5Im9Ml3/Zg@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-16 11:01 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-16 11:01 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-16 11:27 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-16 11:27 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-16 12:08 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-16 12:08 ` Grygorii Strashko
[not found] ` <51E537A4.40300-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-16 13:00 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-16 13:00 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-16 16:17 ` Hein Tibosch
[not found] ` <51E57211.2040001-mRCrAkd8dF0@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-19 12:11 ` Wolfram Sang
2013-08-19 12:11 ` Wolfram Sang
2013-08-19 13:57 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-08-19 13:57 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-08-19 14:05 ` Wolfram Sang
2013-08-20 16:39 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-08-20 16:39 ` Grygorii Strashko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E5137B.7000302@yahoo.es \
--to=hein_tibosch-mrcrakd8df0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=balbi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.