All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
To: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, wni@nvidia.com,
	l.stach@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] thermal: introduce DT thermal zone build
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:10:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E6B3FE.2010000@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374073374-30946-1-git-send-email-eduardo.valentin@ti.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5821 bytes --]

Hi,

On 17-07-2013 11:02, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Hello all,
> 


Looks like I sent duplicated series. Please consider the series
containing 9 patches. I will resend with proper set.


> As you noticed, I am working in a way to represent thermal data
> using device tree [1]. Essentially, this should be a way to say
> what to do with a sensor and how to associate (cooling) actions
> with it.
> 
> The motivation to create such infrastructure is:
> (i) - to reuse the existing temperature sensor code base;
> (ii) - have a way to easily describe thermal data across different
> boards for the same sensor. Say you have an i2c temp sensor,
> which is placed close to your battery on board A but on
> board B, another instance of this same senor is placed
> close to your display, for instance.
> 
> This series introduces then a DT parser. The data expected in
> DT must contain the needed properties to build a thermal zone
> out of the desired sensor. All properties are documented and
> they are derived from the existing requirements of current
> thermal API.
> 
> In order to perform a binding with cooling devices,
> the new thermal zone built using DT nodes will use
> the existing thermal API that uses binding parameters. This is
> the current proposed way to register thermal zones with platform
> information, written by Durga.
> 
> There are some virtual concepts that are pushed to device tree,
> I know. But I believe using device tree to do this makes sense
> because we are still describing the HW and how they are related
> to each other. Things like cooling devices are not represented
> in device tree though, as I believe that will cause a lot of
> confusion with real devices (as already does).
> 
> So the series is short but I think it makes sense to describe
> how it is organized, as it touches several places. First four
> patches are a preparation for this parser. There is a change
> on cpufreq-cpu0, so that it knows now how to load its
> corresponding cooling device. There is a change on thermal_core
> to split its hwmon code, because I think we may need to improve
> this code base when we start to integrate better with hwmon
> temperature sensors. Then, another needed preparation is to
> improve the bind_params, so that we are able to bind with
> upper and lower limits. The remaining patches are the changes
> with the proposed DT parser. A part from the DT thermal zone
> builder itself (patch 05), I also changed the ti-soc-thermal
> driver to use this new API and the omap4430 bandgap DT node,
> as an example (this has been tested on panda omap4430); and also changed
> the hwmon drivers lm75 and tmp102 to have the option to build
> a thermal zone using DT. I haven't touched any dts file using
> lm75 or tmp102 because this should come on a need basis.
> 
> I believe this code is pretty usable the way it is, but might
> need to be revisited, in case the enhancement proposed by Durga
> get in. This is because representing virtual thermal zones
> built out of several sensors may need a different representation
> in DT.
> 
> [1] - RFC of this work:
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/35874
> 
> Changes from RFC:
> - Added a way to load cpufreq cooling device out of DT
> - Added a way to bind with upper and lower limits using bind_params
> - Added a way to specify upper and lower binding limits on DT
> - Added DT thermal builder support to lm75 and tmp102 hwmon drivers
> - Changed ERANGE to EDOM
> - Added thermal constants for zone type and bind limit, so that
>   dts file could be more readable
> 
> Tested on panda omap4430 (3.11-rc1 with minor changes for getting cpufreq working)
> 
> BR,
> 
> Eduardo Valentin (9):
>   cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: add dt node parsing for 'needs-cooling'
>   thermal: hwmon: move hwmon support to single file
>   thermal: thermal_core: allow binding with limits on bind_params
>   arm: dts: flag omap4430 with needs-cooling for cpu node
>   thermal: introduce device tree parser
>   thermal: ti-soc-thermal: use thermal DT infrastructure
>   arm: dts: add omap4430 thermal data
>   hwmon: lm75: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes
>   hwmon: tmp102: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt   |   3 +
>  .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt        | 133 ++++++
>  Documentation/thermal/sysfs-api.txt                |   7 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/omap443x.dtsi                    |  32 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c                     |   8 +
>  drivers/hwmon/lm75.c                               |  29 ++
>  drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c                             |  25 ++
>  drivers/thermal/Kconfig                            |  22 +
>  drivers/thermal/Makefile                           |   4 +
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c                     | 274 +-----------
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_dt.c                       | 458 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_hwmon.c                    | 269 ++++++++++++
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_hwmon.h                    |  49 +++
>  drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c |  46 ++-
>  include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h              |  27 ++
>  include/linux/thermal.h                            |  13 +
>  16 files changed, 1129 insertions(+), 270 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt
>  create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/thermal_dt.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/thermal_hwmon.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/thermal_hwmon.h
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h
> 


-- 
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)

Eduardo Valentin


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 295 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
To: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, wni@nvidia.com,
	l.stach@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 0/9] thermal: introduce DT thermal zone build
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:10:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E6B3FE.2010000@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374073374-30946-1-git-send-email-eduardo.valentin@ti.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5821 bytes --]

Hi,

On 17-07-2013 11:02, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Hello all,
> 


Looks like I sent duplicated series. Please consider the series
containing 9 patches. I will resend with proper set.


> As you noticed, I am working in a way to represent thermal data
> using device tree [1]. Essentially, this should be a way to say
> what to do with a sensor and how to associate (cooling) actions
> with it.
> 
> The motivation to create such infrastructure is:
> (i) - to reuse the existing temperature sensor code base;
> (ii) - have a way to easily describe thermal data across different
> boards for the same sensor. Say you have an i2c temp sensor,
> which is placed close to your battery on board A but on
> board B, another instance of this same senor is placed
> close to your display, for instance.
> 
> This series introduces then a DT parser. The data expected in
> DT must contain the needed properties to build a thermal zone
> out of the desired sensor. All properties are documented and
> they are derived from the existing requirements of current
> thermal API.
> 
> In order to perform a binding with cooling devices,
> the new thermal zone built using DT nodes will use
> the existing thermal API that uses binding parameters. This is
> the current proposed way to register thermal zones with platform
> information, written by Durga.
> 
> There are some virtual concepts that are pushed to device tree,
> I know. But I believe using device tree to do this makes sense
> because we are still describing the HW and how they are related
> to each other. Things like cooling devices are not represented
> in device tree though, as I believe that will cause a lot of
> confusion with real devices (as already does).
> 
> So the series is short but I think it makes sense to describe
> how it is organized, as it touches several places. First four
> patches are a preparation for this parser. There is a change
> on cpufreq-cpu0, so that it knows now how to load its
> corresponding cooling device. There is a change on thermal_core
> to split its hwmon code, because I think we may need to improve
> this code base when we start to integrate better with hwmon
> temperature sensors. Then, another needed preparation is to
> improve the bind_params, so that we are able to bind with
> upper and lower limits. The remaining patches are the changes
> with the proposed DT parser. A part from the DT thermal zone
> builder itself (patch 05), I also changed the ti-soc-thermal
> driver to use this new API and the omap4430 bandgap DT node,
> as an example (this has been tested on panda omap4430); and also changed
> the hwmon drivers lm75 and tmp102 to have the option to build
> a thermal zone using DT. I haven't touched any dts file using
> lm75 or tmp102 because this should come on a need basis.
> 
> I believe this code is pretty usable the way it is, but might
> need to be revisited, in case the enhancement proposed by Durga
> get in. This is because representing virtual thermal zones
> built out of several sensors may need a different representation
> in DT.
> 
> [1] - RFC of this work:
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/35874
> 
> Changes from RFC:
> - Added a way to load cpufreq cooling device out of DT
> - Added a way to bind with upper and lower limits using bind_params
> - Added a way to specify upper and lower binding limits on DT
> - Added DT thermal builder support to lm75 and tmp102 hwmon drivers
> - Changed ERANGE to EDOM
> - Added thermal constants for zone type and bind limit, so that
>   dts file could be more readable
> 
> Tested on panda omap4430 (3.11-rc1 with minor changes for getting cpufreq working)
> 
> BR,
> 
> Eduardo Valentin (9):
>   cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: add dt node parsing for 'needs-cooling'
>   thermal: hwmon: move hwmon support to single file
>   thermal: thermal_core: allow binding with limits on bind_params
>   arm: dts: flag omap4430 with needs-cooling for cpu node
>   thermal: introduce device tree parser
>   thermal: ti-soc-thermal: use thermal DT infrastructure
>   arm: dts: add omap4430 thermal data
>   hwmon: lm75: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes
>   hwmon: tmp102: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt   |   3 +
>  .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt        | 133 ++++++
>  Documentation/thermal/sysfs-api.txt                |   7 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/omap443x.dtsi                    |  32 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c                     |   8 +
>  drivers/hwmon/lm75.c                               |  29 ++
>  drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c                             |  25 ++
>  drivers/thermal/Kconfig                            |  22 +
>  drivers/thermal/Makefile                           |   4 +
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c                     | 274 +-----------
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_dt.c                       | 458 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_hwmon.c                    | 269 ++++++++++++
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_hwmon.h                    |  49 +++
>  drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c |  46 ++-
>  include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h              |  27 ++
>  include/linux/thermal.h                            |  13 +
>  16 files changed, 1129 insertions(+), 270 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt
>  create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/thermal_dt.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/thermal_hwmon.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/thermal_hwmon.h
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h
> 


-- 
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)

Eduardo Valentin


[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 295 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
To: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
Cc: <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>, <wni@nvidia.com>,
	<l.stach@pengutronix.de>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] thermal: introduce DT thermal zone build
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:10:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E6B3FE.2010000@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374073374-30946-1-git-send-email-eduardo.valentin@ti.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5821 bytes --]

Hi,

On 17-07-2013 11:02, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Hello all,
> 


Looks like I sent duplicated series. Please consider the series
containing 9 patches. I will resend with proper set.


> As you noticed, I am working in a way to represent thermal data
> using device tree [1]. Essentially, this should be a way to say
> what to do with a sensor and how to associate (cooling) actions
> with it.
> 
> The motivation to create such infrastructure is:
> (i) - to reuse the existing temperature sensor code base;
> (ii) - have a way to easily describe thermal data across different
> boards for the same sensor. Say you have an i2c temp sensor,
> which is placed close to your battery on board A but on
> board B, another instance of this same senor is placed
> close to your display, for instance.
> 
> This series introduces then a DT parser. The data expected in
> DT must contain the needed properties to build a thermal zone
> out of the desired sensor. All properties are documented and
> they are derived from the existing requirements of current
> thermal API.
> 
> In order to perform a binding with cooling devices,
> the new thermal zone built using DT nodes will use
> the existing thermal API that uses binding parameters. This is
> the current proposed way to register thermal zones with platform
> information, written by Durga.
> 
> There are some virtual concepts that are pushed to device tree,
> I know. But I believe using device tree to do this makes sense
> because we are still describing the HW and how they are related
> to each other. Things like cooling devices are not represented
> in device tree though, as I believe that will cause a lot of
> confusion with real devices (as already does).
> 
> So the series is short but I think it makes sense to describe
> how it is organized, as it touches several places. First four
> patches are a preparation for this parser. There is a change
> on cpufreq-cpu0, so that it knows now how to load its
> corresponding cooling device. There is a change on thermal_core
> to split its hwmon code, because I think we may need to improve
> this code base when we start to integrate better with hwmon
> temperature sensors. Then, another needed preparation is to
> improve the bind_params, so that we are able to bind with
> upper and lower limits. The remaining patches are the changes
> with the proposed DT parser. A part from the DT thermal zone
> builder itself (patch 05), I also changed the ti-soc-thermal
> driver to use this new API and the omap4430 bandgap DT node,
> as an example (this has been tested on panda omap4430); and also changed
> the hwmon drivers lm75 and tmp102 to have the option to build
> a thermal zone using DT. I haven't touched any dts file using
> lm75 or tmp102 because this should come on a need basis.
> 
> I believe this code is pretty usable the way it is, but might
> need to be revisited, in case the enhancement proposed by Durga
> get in. This is because representing virtual thermal zones
> built out of several sensors may need a different representation
> in DT.
> 
> [1] - RFC of this work:
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/35874
> 
> Changes from RFC:
> - Added a way to load cpufreq cooling device out of DT
> - Added a way to bind with upper and lower limits using bind_params
> - Added a way to specify upper and lower binding limits on DT
> - Added DT thermal builder support to lm75 and tmp102 hwmon drivers
> - Changed ERANGE to EDOM
> - Added thermal constants for zone type and bind limit, so that
>   dts file could be more readable
> 
> Tested on panda omap4430 (3.11-rc1 with minor changes for getting cpufreq working)
> 
> BR,
> 
> Eduardo Valentin (9):
>   cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: add dt node parsing for 'needs-cooling'
>   thermal: hwmon: move hwmon support to single file
>   thermal: thermal_core: allow binding with limits on bind_params
>   arm: dts: flag omap4430 with needs-cooling for cpu node
>   thermal: introduce device tree parser
>   thermal: ti-soc-thermal: use thermal DT infrastructure
>   arm: dts: add omap4430 thermal data
>   hwmon: lm75: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes
>   hwmon: tmp102: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt   |   3 +
>  .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt        | 133 ++++++
>  Documentation/thermal/sysfs-api.txt                |   7 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/omap443x.dtsi                    |  32 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c                     |   8 +
>  drivers/hwmon/lm75.c                               |  29 ++
>  drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c                             |  25 ++
>  drivers/thermal/Kconfig                            |  22 +
>  drivers/thermal/Makefile                           |   4 +
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c                     | 274 +-----------
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_dt.c                       | 458 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_hwmon.c                    | 269 ++++++++++++
>  drivers/thermal/thermal_hwmon.h                    |  49 +++
>  drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c |  46 ++-
>  include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h              |  27 ++
>  include/linux/thermal.h                            |  13 +
>  16 files changed, 1129 insertions(+), 270 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt
>  create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/thermal_dt.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/thermal_hwmon.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/thermal_hwmon.h
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h
> 


-- 
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)

Eduardo Valentin


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 295 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-17 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-17 15:02 [PATCH 0/9] thermal: introduce DT thermal zone build Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 1/9] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: add dt node parsing for 'needs-cooling' Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 1/8] thermal: hwmon: move hwmon support to single file Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 1/8] thermal: thermal_core: allow binding with limits on bind_params Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 2/9] thermal: hwmon: move hwmon support to single file Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 2/8] thermal: introduce device tree parser Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 3/8] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: add dt node parsing on cooling need Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 3/9] thermal: thermal_core: allow binding with limits on bind_params Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 4/9] arm: dts: flag omap4430 with needs-cooling for cpu node Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 4/8] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: use thermal DT infrastructure Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 5/8] arm: dts: add omap4430 thermal data Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 5/9] thermal: introduce device tree parser Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 6/8] arm: dts: flag omap4430 with needs-cooling for cpu node Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 6/9] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: use thermal DT infrastructure Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 7/9] arm: dts: add omap4430 thermal data Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 7/8] hwmon: lm75: expose to thermal fw via DT nodes Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 8/9] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 8/8] hwmon: tmp102: " Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 9/9] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:02   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:10 ` Eduardo Valentin [this message]
2013-07-17 15:10   ` [PATCH 0/9] thermal: introduce DT thermal zone build Eduardo Valentin
2013-07-17 15:10   ` [lm-sensors] " Eduardo Valentin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51E6B3FE.2010000@ti.com \
    --to=eduardo.valentin@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=wni@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.