From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] hwmon: using wrong ARRAY_SIZE() limit
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:41:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E80C94.50709@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130717084317.GA4851@elgon.mountain>
Am 18.07.2013 01:36, schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:26:14PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> We cleaned up this code to use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of just the number
>> 4. The problem is that data->reg_temp[] has 5 elements and we actually
>> wanted ARRAY_SIZE(data->temp) which has 4 elements.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>>
> Hi Dan,
>
> good catch, except that the array size of data->temp[] should be 5, not 4.
> So the real culprit is commit 7cbbd6a (Add support for critical low/high
> temperature limits on NCT6106) which increased the size of reg_temp but not the
> size of temp.
>
> Do you want to send me a patch fixing that, or should I take care of it ?
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
hi Guenther,
is an array the way to go here ? To avoid that kind of problems they sould be
connected some how. Is it possible to replace the array with a malloc() ?
re,
wh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [patch] hwmon: using wrong ARRAY_SIZE() limit
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:41:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E80C94.50709@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130717084317.GA4851@elgon.mountain>
Am 18.07.2013 01:36, schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:26:14PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> We cleaned up this code to use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of just the number
>> 4. The problem is that data->reg_temp[] has 5 elements and we actually
>> wanted ARRAY_SIZE(data->temp) which has 4 elements.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>>
> Hi Dan,
>
> good catch, except that the array size of data->temp[] should be 5, not 4.
> So the real culprit is commit 7cbbd6a (Add support for critical low/high
> temperature limits on NCT6106) which increased the size of reg_temp but not the
> size of temp.
>
> Do you want to send me a patch fixing that, or should I take care of it ?
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
hi Guenther,
is an array the way to go here ? To avoid that kind of problems they sould be
connected some how. Is it possible to replace the array with a malloc() ?
re,
wh
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-18 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-17 12:26 [patch] hwmon: using wrong ARRAY_SIZE() limit Dan Carpenter
2013-07-17 12:26 ` [lm-sensors] " Dan Carpenter
2013-07-17 23:36 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-07-17 23:36 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-07-18 15:41 ` walter harms [this message]
2013-07-18 15:41 ` walter harms
2013-07-18 20:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-07-18 20:43 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E80C94.50709@bfs.de \
--to=wharms@bfs.de \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.