From: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
balbi@ti.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, rnayak@ti.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] misc: Add crossbar driver
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:18:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E9197F.7010608@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130719071728.GX7656@atomide.com>
On Friday 19 July 2013 12:47 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> On Thursday 18 July 2013 02:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>
>> Since the cross-bar is not limited t0 IRQ lines and applicable for
>> DMA request lines as well, making it IRQ chip doesn't make sense. Its
>> not typical pin control functionality either but at least that framework
>> is much closer to consider as an option.
>>
>> Actually its more of setting up the IRQ and DMA pins maps once
>> at boot for a given SOC based on chosen configuration by the
>> board. So I am leaning towards pinctrl as well. Just haven't
>> thought enough about whether thats the best approach.
>>
>> CC'ing Linus W and Tony L whether we can use pinctrl framework
>> for such an IP and if yes how ;-).
> If it really muxes signals then using pinctrl seems logical.
> Especially if the registers are in the SCM block.
>
> It might be already possible to handle it already with
> pinctrl-single,bits for the muxing part.
I also thought of using the pinctrl itself.
But then i wanted to have the error handling as well,
hence did this.
Regards,
Sricharan
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: r.sricharan@ti.com (Sricharan R)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] misc: Add crossbar driver
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:18:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E9197F.7010608@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130719071728.GX7656@atomide.com>
On Friday 19 July 2013 12:47 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> On Thursday 18 July 2013 02:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>
>> Since the cross-bar is not limited t0 IRQ lines and applicable for
>> DMA request lines as well, making it IRQ chip doesn't make sense. Its
>> not typical pin control functionality either but at least that framework
>> is much closer to consider as an option.
>>
>> Actually its more of setting up the IRQ and DMA pins maps once
>> at boot for a given SOC based on chosen configuration by the
>> board. So I am leaning towards pinctrl as well. Just haven't
>> thought enough about whether thats the best approach.
>>
>> CC'ing Linus W and Tony L whether we can use pinctrl framework
>> for such an IP and if yes how ;-).
> If it really muxes signals then using pinctrl seems logical.
> Especially if the registers are in the SCM block.
>
> It might be already possible to handle it already with
> pinctrl-single,bits for the muxing part.
I also thought of using the pinctrl itself.
But then i wanted to have the error handling as well,
hence did this.
Regards,
Sricharan
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, <balbi@ti.com>,
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>, <rnayak@ti.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] misc: Add crossbar driver
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:18:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E9197F.7010608@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130719071728.GX7656@atomide.com>
On Friday 19 July 2013 12:47 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> On Thursday 18 July 2013 02:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>
>> Since the cross-bar is not limited t0 IRQ lines and applicable for
>> DMA request lines as well, making it IRQ chip doesn't make sense. Its
>> not typical pin control functionality either but at least that framework
>> is much closer to consider as an option.
>>
>> Actually its more of setting up the IRQ and DMA pins maps once
>> at boot for a given SOC based on chosen configuration by the
>> board. So I am leaning towards pinctrl as well. Just haven't
>> thought enough about whether thats the best approach.
>>
>> CC'ing Linus W and Tony L whether we can use pinctrl framework
>> for such an IP and if yes how ;-).
> If it really muxes signals then using pinctrl seems logical.
> Especially if the registers are in the SCM block.
>
> It might be already possible to handle it already with
> pinctrl-single,bits for the muxing part.
I also thought of using the pinctrl itself.
But then i wanted to have the error handling as well,
hence did this.
Regards,
Sricharan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-19 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-18 16:43 [PATCH 0/3] Add crossbar driver Sricharan R
2013-07-18 16:43 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-18 16:43 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-18 16:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] misc: " Sricharan R
2013-07-18 16:43 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-18 16:43 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-18 16:55 ` Joe Perches
2013-07-18 16:55 ` Joe Perches
2013-07-18 18:25 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-18 18:25 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-18 18:25 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-21 16:33 ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-21 16:33 ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-18 18:56 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-18 18:56 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-18 18:56 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-18 23:39 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-18 23:39 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-18 23:39 ` Santosh Shilimkar
[not found] ` <51E87C98.5030001-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-19 0:13 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-19 0:13 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-19 0:13 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-19 10:48 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-19 10:48 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-19 10:48 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-19 7:17 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-19 7:17 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-19 10:48 ` Sricharan R [this message]
2013-07-19 10:48 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-19 10:48 ` Sricharan R
[not found] ` <51E83A4F.5080904-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-21 16:49 ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-21 16:49 ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-21 16:49 ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-22 12:20 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-22 12:20 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-22 16:23 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-22 16:23 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-24 16:08 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-24 16:08 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-24 16:38 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-24 16:38 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-24 16:47 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-24 16:47 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-24 18:43 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-24 18:43 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-24 18:51 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-24 18:51 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-24 18:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-24 18:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-13 8:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-08-13 8:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-08-13 9:56 ` Sricharan R
2013-08-13 9:56 ` Sricharan R
2013-08-13 9:56 ` Sricharan R
2013-08-13 13:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-13 13:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-13 13:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-15 20:01 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-15 20:01 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-15 20:26 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-15 20:26 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-15 20:51 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-15 20:51 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-15 21:14 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-15 21:14 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-15 21:14 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-21 21:10 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-21 21:10 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-22 11:33 ` Sricharan R
2013-08-22 11:33 ` Sricharan R
2013-08-22 11:33 ` Sricharan R
2013-08-22 13:45 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-22 13:45 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-23 4:47 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-23 4:47 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-23 6:11 ` Sricharan R
2013-08-23 6:11 ` Sricharan R
2013-08-23 6:17 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-23 6:17 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-23 6:17 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-23 6:36 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-23 6:36 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-23 6:53 ` Sricharan R
2013-08-23 6:53 ` Sricharan R
2013-08-23 8:14 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-23 8:14 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-23 8:14 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-23 13:38 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-23 13:38 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-23 16:28 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-23 16:28 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-23 16:28 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-23 19:06 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-23 19:06 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-23 19:44 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-23 19:44 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-23 19:44 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-13 13:28 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-13 13:28 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-14 7:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-08-14 7:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-18 16:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: DRA: Add crossbar device binding Sricharan R
2013-07-18 16:43 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-18 16:43 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-18 19:04 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-18 19:04 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-18 19:04 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-07-18 16:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: DRA7xx: Enable crossbar driver for the soc Sricharan R
2013-07-18 16:43 ` Sricharan R
2013-07-18 16:43 ` Sricharan R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E9197F.7010608@ti.com \
--to=r.sricharan@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.