From: Alex Courbot <acourbot-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Morton
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)"
<tixy-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"gnurou-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
<gnurou-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] decompressors: fix "no limit" output buffer length
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:01:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51EE0E2C.8090103@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51EDF93B.1070101-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
On 07/23/2013 12:32 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/22/2013 07:15 PM, Alex Courbot wrote:
> ...
>> Although the patch seems ok to me in its current form, there are two
>> points for which I still have small doubts:
>>
>> 1) Whether size_t and pointers will have the same size on all platforms.
>
> ptrsize_t?
>
Do you mean ptrdiff_t? (I cannot find ptrsize_t anywhere in the kernel)
Looking further about the uses of size_t and ptrdiff_t, it seems like
size_t is designed to store the maximum addressable member of an array,
whereas ptrdiff_t is used to store a substraction of two pointers. In
effect, they translate to the unsigned (size_t) and signed (ptrdiff_t)
variants of the same type.
But since here we know that the result of the substraction will always
be positive and potentially big (for devices with memory in the lower
half of the address space) using size_t sounds safer to avoid overflows
and sign-conversion issues (strm->avail_out, where the value of out_len
eventually ends, is an unsigned int).
So point 1) at least seems to be handled correctly with size_t. Point 2)
might still be of concern, but if your uncompressed kernel image ends up
overflowing your addressable memory, I guess you have a bigger problem
to start with. :)
Andrew, do you think you can merge this as-is? Sorry if you are not the
right person to ask, but there is no clear maintainer for this part of
the code and you appear to have handled the latest patches that affect
the same file.
Thanks,
Alex.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: acourbot@nvidia.com (Alex Courbot)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] decompressors: fix "no limit" output buffer length
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:01:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51EE0E2C.8090103@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51EDF93B.1070101@wwwdotorg.org>
On 07/23/2013 12:32 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/22/2013 07:15 PM, Alex Courbot wrote:
> ...
>> Although the patch seems ok to me in its current form, there are two
>> points for which I still have small doubts:
>>
>> 1) Whether size_t and pointers will have the same size on all platforms.
>
> ptrsize_t?
>
Do you mean ptrdiff_t? (I cannot find ptrsize_t anywhere in the kernel)
Looking further about the uses of size_t and ptrdiff_t, it seems like
size_t is designed to store the maximum addressable member of an array,
whereas ptrdiff_t is used to store a substraction of two pointers. In
effect, they translate to the unsigned (size_t) and signed (ptrdiff_t)
variants of the same type.
But since here we know that the result of the substraction will always
be positive and potentially big (for devices with memory in the lower
half of the address space) using size_t sounds safer to avoid overflows
and sign-conversion issues (strm->avail_out, where the value of out_len
eventually ends, is an unsigned int).
So point 1) at least seems to be handled correctly with size_t. Point 2)
might still be of concern, but if your uncompressed kernel image ends up
overflowing your addressable memory, I guess you have a bigger problem
to start with. :)
Andrew, do you think you can merge this as-is? Sorry if you are not the
right person to ask, but there is no clear maintainer for this part of
the code and you appear to have handled the latest patches that affect
the same file.
Thanks,
Alex.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alex Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org>,
"gnurou@gmail.com" <gnurou@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] decompressors: fix "no limit" output buffer length
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:01:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51EE0E2C.8090103@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51EDF93B.1070101@wwwdotorg.org>
On 07/23/2013 12:32 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/22/2013 07:15 PM, Alex Courbot wrote:
> ...
>> Although the patch seems ok to me in its current form, there are two
>> points for which I still have small doubts:
>>
>> 1) Whether size_t and pointers will have the same size on all platforms.
>
> ptrsize_t?
>
Do you mean ptrdiff_t? (I cannot find ptrsize_t anywhere in the kernel)
Looking further about the uses of size_t and ptrdiff_t, it seems like
size_t is designed to store the maximum addressable member of an array,
whereas ptrdiff_t is used to store a substraction of two pointers. In
effect, they translate to the unsigned (size_t) and signed (ptrdiff_t)
variants of the same type.
But since here we know that the result of the substraction will always
be positive and potentially big (for devices with memory in the lower
half of the address space) using size_t sounds safer to avoid overflows
and sign-conversion issues (strm->avail_out, where the value of out_len
eventually ends, is an unsigned int).
So point 1) at least seems to be handled correctly with size_t. Point 2)
might still be of concern, but if your uncompressed kernel image ends up
overflowing your addressable memory, I guess you have a bigger problem
to start with. :)
Andrew, do you think you can merge this as-is? Sorry if you are not the
right person to ask, but there is no clear maintainer for this part of
the code and you appear to have handled the latest patches that affect
the same file.
Thanks,
Alex.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-23 5:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-22 6:56 [PATCH] decompressors: fix "no limit" output buffer length Alexandre Courbot
2013-07-22 6:56 ` Alexandre Courbot
2013-07-22 18:08 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-07-22 18:08 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2013-07-23 2:15 ` Alex Courbot
2013-07-23 2:15 ` Alex Courbot
[not found] ` <51EDE724.5020507-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-23 3:32 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-23 3:32 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-23 3:32 ` Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <51EDF93B.1070101-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-23 5:01 ` Alex Courbot [this message]
2013-07-23 5:01 ` Alex Courbot
2013-07-23 5:01 ` Alex Courbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51EE0E2C.8090103@nvidia.com \
--to=acourbot-ddmlm1+adcrqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gnurou-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tixy-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.