From: Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com (Sudeep KarkadaNagesha)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] ARM: DT: remove redundant DT related code
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:36:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51EE78D0.50803@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51EE779A.8000205@monstr.eu>
On 23/07/13 13:31, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 07/23/2013 01:32 PM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As part of my changes to remove duplicate code for parsing cpu nodes
>> in the device tree, I found few unnecessary code mostly around smp_init_cpus.
>> Most of the ARM Cortex A9 based platforms use SCU to get the number of cpus
>> while many others depend on the device tree.
>>
>> Even on DT based platforms using SCU, they can be made to depend on DT
>> to cpu count simplifying smp_init_cpus. In fact arm_dt_init_cpu_maps called
>> before smp_init_cpus, already does the device tree parsing, validating
>> nr_cpu_ids and setting the cpu_possible_mask appropriately.
>>
>> However this series targets only the platforms using DT for cpu count
>> (i.e. not using SCU)
>
> Just a note. Zynq is using SCU to get cpu count not DT.
>
Correct, when I saw that vexpress and zynq were only 2 platforms
setting cpu_present_mask which is unnecessary, I added Zynq last minute
to this series.
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-23 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-23 11:32 [PATCH 0/5] ARM: DT: remove redundant DT related code Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23 11:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: keystone: remove redundant smp_init_cpus definition Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23 13:26 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-23 11:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: vexpress: remove redundant vexpress_dt_cpus_num to get cpu count Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-09 9:25 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23 11:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: mach-mvebu: remove redundant DT parsing and validation Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-08 14:54 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-08 15:19 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-08-08 15:50 ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-09 13:11 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-23 11:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: highbank: remove redundant smp_init_cpus definition Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23 15:03 ` Rob Herring
2013-07-23 15:34 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23 11:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: zynq: remove unnecessary setting of cpu_present_mask Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23 12:31 ` [PATCH 0/5] ARM: DT: remove redundant DT related code Michal Simek
2013-07-23 12:36 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha [this message]
2013-07-23 19:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-24 10:48 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51EE78D0.50803@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.