From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: chenhui.zhao@freescale.com, "paulus@samba.org" <paulus@samba.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: kernel: remove useless code which related with 'max_cpus'
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:17:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F0C2E8.3050005@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374731505.6142.64.camel@pasglop>
On 07/25/2013 01:51 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 13:24 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> For an extern function, if the performance is not sensible, better to
>> have the return value which can indicate the failure with the negative
>> number.
>
> The return value is meaningless.
>
> We don't have a good way to handle it. It has no defined semantics. What
> does "failure" means in that case ? Nothing !
>
> So just remove it.
>
Hmm... for an extern function (espeically have been implemented in
various modules), normally, we can assume it may fail in some cases
(although now, we don't know what cases can cause its failure).
If "we don't have a good way to handle the failure", "print the related
warning message" is an executable choice (or "BUG_ON()", if it is critical).
So, if the performance is not sensible, I still suggest to let extern
function have return value.
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-25 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-22 5:58 [PATCH] powerpc: kernel: remove useless code which related with 'max_cpus' Chen Gang
2013-07-22 6:18 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-07-22 6:27 ` Chen Gang
2013-07-22 6:40 ` [PATCH v2] " Chen Gang
2013-07-22 6:51 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2013-07-22 7:03 ` Chen Gang
2013-07-23 13:44 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-07-24 0:28 ` Chen Gang
2013-07-24 1:16 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-07-24 2:09 ` Chen Gang
2013-07-25 3:15 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-07-25 4:02 ` Chen Gang
2013-07-25 5:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-25 5:24 ` Chen Gang
2013-07-25 5:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-25 6:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-25 6:30 ` Chen Gang
2013-07-25 6:17 ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-07-25 7:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-25 7:59 ` Chen Gang
2013-07-25 8:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-25 8:22 ` Chen Gang
2013-07-25 8:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-25 8:36 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F0C2E8.3050005@asianux.com \
--to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=chenhui.zhao@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.