From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: "Mike Turquette" <mturquette@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Saravana Kannan" <skannan@codeaurora.org>,
"Doug Anderson" <dianders@chromium.org>,
"Sascha Hauer" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Russell King" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Viresh Kumar" <viresh.linux@gmail.com>,
"Stephen Warren" <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
"Haojian Zhuang" <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
"Chao Xie" <xiechao.mail@gmail.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Emilio López" <emilio@elopez.com.ar>,
"Gregory CLEMENT" <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
"Prashant Gaikwad" <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>,
"Joseph Lo" <josephl@nvidia.com>,
"Peter De Schrijver" <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>,
"Pawel Moll" <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] clk: add CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:34:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F11B46.7010900@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371139562-305-5-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Hi James,
On 06/13/2013 06:06 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> Add a CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT clock flag, which will prevent muxes
> being reparented during clk_set_rate.
>
> To avoid breaking existing platforms, all callers of clk_register_mux()
> are adjusted to pass the new flag. Platform maintainers are encouraged
> to remove the flag if they wish to allow mux reparenting on set_rate.
[..]
> Changes in v3:
>
> * rename/invert CLK_SET_RATE_REMUX to CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT and move
> to this new patch.
> * patch 3: add CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag to all callers of
> clk_register_mux. If you don't mind your clocks being reparented in
> response to set_rate please let me know and I'll drop the relevant
> portion of the patch.
Why is this better to change current behaviour of the clock core
and modify all drivers instead of having, e.g. CLK_SET_RATE_REPARENT
set in drivers of hardware that supports clock re-parenting while
setting clock rate ?
Is there intention to just have the automatic clock re-parenting
as a default feature in the common clock API ?
My apologies if this has already been answered, I haven't been
following this thread.
Thanks,
Sylwester
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk.h | 5 +-
> drivers/clk/mmp/clk-mmp2.c | 39 +++++---
> drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa168.c | 40 +++++---
> drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa910.c | 31 +++---
> drivers/clk/mxs/clk.h | 4 +-
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h | 2 +-
> drivers/clk/spear/spear1310_clock.c | 179 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> drivers/clk/spear/spear1340_clock.c | 97 ++++++++++---------
> drivers/clk/spear/spear3xx_clock.c | 57 +++++++----
> drivers/clk/spear/spear6xx_clock.c | 35 +++----
> drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 3 +-
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c | 36 ++++---
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c | 6 +-
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c | 33 ++++---
> drivers/clk/versatile/clk-vexpress.c | 4 +-
> include/linux/clk-provider.h | 1 +
> 16 files changed, 334 insertions(+), 238 deletions(-)
--
Sylwester Nawrocki
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: s.nawrocki@samsung.com (Sylwester Nawrocki)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/5] clk: add CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:34:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F11B46.7010900@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371139562-305-5-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Hi James,
On 06/13/2013 06:06 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> Add a CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT clock flag, which will prevent muxes
> being reparented during clk_set_rate.
>
> To avoid breaking existing platforms, all callers of clk_register_mux()
> are adjusted to pass the new flag. Platform maintainers are encouraged
> to remove the flag if they wish to allow mux reparenting on set_rate.
[..]
> Changes in v3:
>
> * rename/invert CLK_SET_RATE_REMUX to CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT and move
> to this new patch.
> * patch 3: add CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag to all callers of
> clk_register_mux. If you don't mind your clocks being reparented in
> response to set_rate please let me know and I'll drop the relevant
> portion of the patch.
Why is this better to change current behaviour of the clock core
and modify all drivers instead of having, e.g. CLK_SET_RATE_REPARENT
set in drivers of hardware that supports clock re-parenting while
setting clock rate ?
Is there intention to just have the automatic clock re-parenting
as a default feature in the common clock API ?
My apologies if this has already been answered, I haven't been
following this thread.
Thanks,
Sylwester
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk.h | 5 +-
> drivers/clk/mmp/clk-mmp2.c | 39 +++++---
> drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa168.c | 40 +++++---
> drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa910.c | 31 +++---
> drivers/clk/mxs/clk.h | 4 +-
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h | 2 +-
> drivers/clk/spear/spear1310_clock.c | 179 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> drivers/clk/spear/spear1340_clock.c | 97 ++++++++++---------
> drivers/clk/spear/spear3xx_clock.c | 57 +++++++----
> drivers/clk/spear/spear6xx_clock.c | 35 +++----
> drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 3 +-
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c | 36 ++++---
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c | 6 +-
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c | 33 ++++---
> drivers/clk/versatile/clk-vexpress.c | 4 +-
> include/linux/clk-provider.h | 1 +
> 16 files changed, 334 insertions(+), 238 deletions(-)
--
Sylwester Nawrocki
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: "Mike Turquette" <mturquette@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Saravana Kannan" <skannan@codeaurora.org>,
"Doug Anderson" <dianders@chromium.org>,
"Sascha Hauer" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Russell King" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Viresh Kumar" <viresh.linux@gmail.com>,
"Stephen Warren" <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
"Haojian Zhuang" <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
"Chao Xie" <xiechao.mail@gmail.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Emilio López" <emilio@elopez.com.ar>,
"Gregory CLEMENT" <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
"Prashant Gaikwad" <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>,
"Joseph Lo" <josephl@nvidia.com>,
"Peter De Schrijver" <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>,
"Pawel Moll" <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] clk: add CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:34:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F11B46.7010900@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371139562-305-5-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Hi James,
On 06/13/2013 06:06 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> Add a CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT clock flag, which will prevent muxes
> being reparented during clk_set_rate.
>
> To avoid breaking existing platforms, all callers of clk_register_mux()
> are adjusted to pass the new flag. Platform maintainers are encouraged
> to remove the flag if they wish to allow mux reparenting on set_rate.
[..]
> Changes in v3:
>
> * rename/invert CLK_SET_RATE_REMUX to CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT and move
> to this new patch.
> * patch 3: add CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag to all callers of
> clk_register_mux. If you don't mind your clocks being reparented in
> response to set_rate please let me know and I'll drop the relevant
> portion of the patch.
Why is this better to change current behaviour of the clock core
and modify all drivers instead of having, e.g. CLK_SET_RATE_REPARENT
set in drivers of hardware that supports clock re-parenting while
setting clock rate ?
Is there intention to just have the automatic clock re-parenting
as a default feature in the common clock API ?
My apologies if this has already been answered, I haven't been
following this thread.
Thanks,
Sylwester
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk.h | 5 +-
> drivers/clk/mmp/clk-mmp2.c | 39 +++++---
> drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa168.c | 40 +++++---
> drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa910.c | 31 +++---
> drivers/clk/mxs/clk.h | 4 +-
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h | 2 +-
> drivers/clk/spear/spear1310_clock.c | 179 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> drivers/clk/spear/spear1340_clock.c | 97 ++++++++++---------
> drivers/clk/spear/spear3xx_clock.c | 57 +++++++----
> drivers/clk/spear/spear6xx_clock.c | 35 +++----
> drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 3 +-
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c | 36 ++++---
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c | 6 +-
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c | 33 ++++---
> drivers/clk/versatile/clk-vexpress.c | 4 +-
> include/linux/clk-provider.h | 1 +
> 16 files changed, 334 insertions(+), 238 deletions(-)
--
Sylwester Nawrocki
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-25 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-13 16:05 [PATCH v5 0/5] clk: implement remuxing during set_rate James Hogan
2013-06-13 16:05 ` James Hogan
2013-06-13 16:05 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] clk: abstract parent cache James Hogan
2013-06-13 16:05 ` James Hogan
2013-06-13 16:05 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] clk: move some parent related functions upwards James Hogan
2013-06-13 16:05 ` James Hogan
2013-06-13 16:06 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] clk: add support for clock reparent on set_rate James Hogan
2013-06-13 16:06 ` James Hogan
2013-06-13 16:06 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] clk: add CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag James Hogan
2013-06-13 16:06 ` James Hogan
2013-06-13 16:06 ` James Hogan
2013-07-25 12:34 ` Sylwester Nawrocki [this message]
2013-07-25 12:34 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-07-25 12:34 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-07-25 12:55 ` James Hogan
2013-07-25 12:55 ` James Hogan
2013-07-25 12:55 ` James Hogan
2013-07-25 18:05 ` Mike Turquette
2013-07-25 18:05 ` Mike Turquette
2013-07-25 18:05 ` Mike Turquette
2013-06-13 16:06 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] clk: clk-mux: implement remuxing on set_rate James Hogan
2013-06-13 16:06 ` James Hogan
2013-06-21 17:04 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] clk: implement remuxing during set_rate Mike Turquette
2013-06-21 17:04 ` Mike Turquette
2013-06-21 21:27 ` James Hogan
2013-06-21 21:27 ` James Hogan
2013-07-24 18:39 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-24 18:39 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-25 9:07 ` James Hogan
2013-07-25 9:07 ` James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F11B46.7010900@samsung.com \
--to=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=emilio@elopez.com.ar \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=josephl@nvidia.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
--cc=pgaikwad@nvidia.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
--cc=viresh.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=xiechao.mail@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.