From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] efi: x86: make efi_lookup_mapped_addr() a common function
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 09:58:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F8D1AC.4040501@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375202858-28470-5-git-send-email-leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
On 07/30/2013 05:47 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> efi_lookup_mapped_addr() is a handy utility for other platforms
> than x86. Move it from arch/x86 to drivers/firmware/efi.
>
> This function will be used by future ARM patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 28 ----------------------------
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86)
> +/*
> + * We can't ioremap data in EFI boot services RAM, because we've already mapped
> + * it as RAM. So, look it up in the existing EFI memory map instead. Only
> + * callable after efi_enter_virtual_mode and before efi_free_boot_services.
> + */
> +void __iomem *efi_lookup_mapped_addr(u64 phys_addr)
> +{
> + void *p;
> + if (WARN_ON(!memmap.map))
> + return NULL;
> + for (p = memmap.map; p < memmap.map_end; p += memmap.desc_size) {
> + efi_memory_desc_t *md = p;
> + u64 size = md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
> + u64 end = md->phys_addr + size;
> + if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME) &&
> + md->type != EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_CODE &&
> + md->type != EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA)
> + continue;
> + if (!md->virt_addr)
> + continue;
> + if (phys_addr >= md->phys_addr && phys_addr < end) {
> + phys_addr += md->virt_addr - md->phys_addr;
> + return (__force void __iomem *)(unsigned long)phys_addr;
> + }
> + }
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
If we hang a 'struct efi_memory_map' off of 'struct efi', can we get rid
of this #ifdef?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] efi: x86: make efi_lookup_mapped_addr() a common function
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:58:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F8D1AC.4040501@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375202858-28470-5-git-send-email-leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
On 07/30/2013 05:47 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> efi_lookup_mapped_addr() is a handy utility for other platforms
> than x86. Move it from arch/x86 to drivers/firmware/efi.
>
> This function will be used by future ARM patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 28 ----------------------------
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86)
> +/*
> + * We can't ioremap data in EFI boot services RAM, because we've already mapped
> + * it as RAM. So, look it up in the existing EFI memory map instead. Only
> + * callable after efi_enter_virtual_mode and before efi_free_boot_services.
> + */
> +void __iomem *efi_lookup_mapped_addr(u64 phys_addr)
> +{
> + void *p;
> + if (WARN_ON(!memmap.map))
> + return NULL;
> + for (p = memmap.map; p < memmap.map_end; p += memmap.desc_size) {
> + efi_memory_desc_t *md = p;
> + u64 size = md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
> + u64 end = md->phys_addr + size;
> + if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME) &&
> + md->type != EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_CODE &&
> + md->type != EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA)
> + continue;
> + if (!md->virt_addr)
> + continue;
> + if (phys_addr >= md->phys_addr && phys_addr < end) {
> + phys_addr += md->virt_addr - md->phys_addr;
> + return (__force void __iomem *)(unsigned long)phys_addr;
> + }
> + }
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
If we hang a 'struct efi_memory_map' off of 'struct efi', can we get rid
of this #ifdef?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-31 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-30 16:47 [PATCH 0/4] Make commonly useful UEFI functions common Leif Lindholm
2013-07-30 16:47 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-07-30 16:47 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-07-30 16:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] efi: provide a generic efi_config_init() Leif Lindholm
2013-07-30 16:47 ` Leif Lindholm
[not found] ` <1375202858-28470-2-git-send-email-leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-30 17:53 ` Tony Luck
2013-07-30 17:53 ` Tony Luck
2013-07-30 17:53 ` Tony Luck
2013-07-30 18:02 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-07-30 18:02 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-07-30 18:14 ` Tony Luck
2013-07-30 18:14 ` Tony Luck
2013-07-30 16:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] efi: x86: use common code for (U)EFI configuration scanning Leif Lindholm
2013-07-30 16:47 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-07-30 16:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] efi: ia64: " Leif Lindholm
2013-07-30 16:47 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-07-30 16:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] efi: x86: make efi_lookup_mapped_addr() a common function Leif Lindholm
2013-07-30 16:47 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-07-31 8:58 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2013-07-31 8:58 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <51F8D1AC.4040501-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-01 10:11 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-08-01 10:11 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-08-01 10:11 ` Leif Lindholm
[not found] ` <1375202858-28470-1-git-send-email-leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2013-07-30 19:57 ` [PATCH 0/4] Make commonly useful UEFI functions common Tony Luck
2013-07-30 19:57 ` Tony Luck
2013-07-30 19:57 ` Tony Luck
2013-08-01 20:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-01 20:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-01 20:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-01 20:45 ` Fleming, Matt
2013-08-01 20:45 ` Fleming, Matt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F8D1AC.4040501@intel.com \
--to=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=leif.lindholm@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.