From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: andy@greyhouse.net, davem@davemloft.net, fubar@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] bonding: groundwork and initial conversion to RCU
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 17:39:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F92FB8.1090000@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375283553-32070-1-git-send-email-nikolay@redhat.com>
On 07/31/2013 05:12 PM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
<snip>
> For performance notes please refer to patch 5 (RCU conversion one).
>
Oops, I've forgotten to include the performance tests, here they are:
2 slaves were used in all tests.
1. Active-backup mode
1.1 Perf recording while doing iperf -P 4
- old bonding: iperf spent 0.55% in bonding, system spent 0.29% CPU
in bonding
- new bonding: iperf spent 0.29% in bonding, system spent 0.15% CPU
in bonding
1.2. Bandwidth measurements
- old bonding: 16.1 gbps consistently
- new bonding: 17.5 gbps consistently
2. Round-robin mode
2.1 Perf recording while doing iperf -P 4
- old bonding: iperf spent 0.51% in bonding, system spent 0.24% CPU
in bonding
- new bonding: iperf spent 0.16% in bonding, system spent 0.11% CPU
in bonding
2.2 Bandwidth measurements
- old bonding: 8 gbps (variable due to packet reorderings)
- new bonding: 10 gbps (variable due to packet reorderings)
Of course the latency has improved in all converted modes, and moreover while
doing enslave/release (since it doesn't affect tx anymore).
Also I've stress tested all modes doing enslave/release in a loop while
transmitting traffic.
Cheers,
Nik
> Best regards,
> Nikolay Aleksandrov
<snip>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-31 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-31 15:12 [PATCH net-next 0/5] bonding: groundwork and initial conversion to RCU Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-07-31 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] bonding: convert to list API and replace bond's custom list Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-07-31 18:28 ` Jay Vosburgh
2013-07-31 18:42 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-07-31 18:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-07-31 18:44 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-07-31 18:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-07-31 19:00 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-07-31 18:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-07-31 18:49 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-07-31 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] bonding: remove unnecessary read_locks of curr_slave_lock Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-07-31 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] bonding: simplify broadcast_xmit function Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-07-31 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] bonding: factor out slave id tx code and simplify xmit paths Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-07-31 15:12 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] bonding: initial RCU conversion Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-08-01 6:46 ` Ding Tianhong
2013-08-01 7:55 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2013-07-31 15:27 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] bonding: groundwork and initial conversion to RCU Eric Dumazet
2013-07-31 15:39 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message]
2013-07-31 18:03 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F92FB8.1090000@redhat.com \
--to=nikolay@redhat.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.