From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
To: Piotr Sarna <p.sarna@partner.samsung.com>
Cc: b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: zcache: zcache_cleancache_flush_fs fix
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 17:43:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5200C527.5030006@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375781762-15344-1-git-send-email-p.sarna@partner.samsung.com>
Hi Piotr,
On 08/06/2013 05:36 PM, Piotr Sarna wrote:
> This patch fixes "mm: zcache: core functions added" patch,
> available at https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/20/90.
> It regards incorrect implementation of zcache_cleancache_flush_fs().
>
> Function above should be effective only if cleancache pool referred
> by pool_id is valid. This issue is checked by testing whether zpool
> points to NULL.
>
> Unfortunately, if filesystem mount fails, such pool is never created
> and fs/super.c calls cleancache_invalidate_fs() function with pool_id
> parameter set to -1. This results in assigning zpool with pools[-1],
> which causes zpool to be not NULL and thus whole function hangs on
> uninitialized read-write lock.
>
> To prevent that behaviour, pool_id should be checked for being positive
> before assigning zpool variable with pools[pool_id].
>
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Sarna <p.sarna@partner.samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Yes, that's a problem. Thank you very much!
I'm so glad you are also interesting in zcache. I'm preparing a update
version of zcache which is still under testing currently.
> ---
> mm/zcache.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/zcache.c b/mm/zcache.c
> index a2408e8..7e6d2e7 100644
> --- a/mm/zcache.c
> +++ b/mm/zcache.c
> @@ -600,8 +600,12 @@ static void zcache_cleancache_flush_fs(int pool_id)
> struct zcache_rb_entry *entry = NULL;
> struct rb_node *node;
> unsigned long flags1, flags2;
> - struct zcache_pool *zpool = zcache.pools[pool_id];
> + struct zcache_pool *zpool;
> +
> + if (pool_id < 0)
> + return;
>
> + zpool = zcache.pools[pool_id];
> if (!zpool)
> return;
>
>
--
Regards,
-Bob
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
To: Piotr Sarna <p.sarna@partner.samsung.com>
Cc: b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: zcache: zcache_cleancache_flush_fs fix
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 17:43:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5200C527.5030006@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375781762-15344-1-git-send-email-p.sarna@partner.samsung.com>
Hi Piotr,
On 08/06/2013 05:36 PM, Piotr Sarna wrote:
> This patch fixes "mm: zcache: core functions added" patch,
> available at https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/20/90.
> It regards incorrect implementation of zcache_cleancache_flush_fs().
>
> Function above should be effective only if cleancache pool referred
> by pool_id is valid. This issue is checked by testing whether zpool
> points to NULL.
>
> Unfortunately, if filesystem mount fails, such pool is never created
> and fs/super.c calls cleancache_invalidate_fs() function with pool_id
> parameter set to -1. This results in assigning zpool with pools[-1],
> which causes zpool to be not NULL and thus whole function hangs on
> uninitialized read-write lock.
>
> To prevent that behaviour, pool_id should be checked for being positive
> before assigning zpool variable with pools[pool_id].
>
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Sarna <p.sarna@partner.samsung.com>
> Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Yes, that's a problem. Thank you very much!
I'm so glad you are also interesting in zcache. I'm preparing a update
version of zcache which is still under testing currently.
> ---
> mm/zcache.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/zcache.c b/mm/zcache.c
> index a2408e8..7e6d2e7 100644
> --- a/mm/zcache.c
> +++ b/mm/zcache.c
> @@ -600,8 +600,12 @@ static void zcache_cleancache_flush_fs(int pool_id)
> struct zcache_rb_entry *entry = NULL;
> struct rb_node *node;
> unsigned long flags1, flags2;
> - struct zcache_pool *zpool = zcache.pools[pool_id];
> + struct zcache_pool *zpool;
> +
> + if (pool_id < 0)
> + return;
>
> + zpool = zcache.pools[pool_id];
> if (!zpool)
> return;
>
>
--
Regards,
-Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-06 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-06 9:36 [PATCH] mm: zcache: zcache_cleancache_flush_fs fix Piotr Sarna
2013-08-06 9:36 ` Piotr Sarna
2013-08-06 9:43 ` Bob Liu [this message]
2013-08-06 9:43 ` Bob Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5200C527.5030006@oracle.com \
--to=bob.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=p.sarna@partner.samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.