From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI, cpu hotplug: move try_offline_node() after acpi_unmap_lsapic()
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 12:23:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5201BDB9.8050301@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375808178.10300.181.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
(2013/08/07 1:56), Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:11 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
>> try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have been
>> removed by using cpu_present_bits. If all cpus related with removed node have
>> been removed, try_offline_node() clears the node information.
>>
>> But try_offline_node() called from acpi_processor_remove() never clears
>> the node information. For disabling cpu_present_bits, acpi_unmap_lsapic()
>> need be called. But acpi_unmap_lsapic() is called after try_offline_node()
>> runs. So when try_offline_node() runs, the cpu's cpu_present_bits is always
>> set.
>>
>> This patch moves try_offline_node() after acpi_unmap_lsapic().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> The change looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Thanks, Toshi!
> BTW, do you know why try_offline_node() has to use stop_machine()?
I don't know the reason.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
> Thanks,
> -Toshi
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI, cpu hotplug: move try_offline_node() after acpi_unmap_lsapic()
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 12:23:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5201BDB9.8050301@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375808178.10300.181.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
(2013/08/07 1:56), Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:11 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
>> try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have been
>> removed by using cpu_present_bits. If all cpus related with removed node have
>> been removed, try_offline_node() clears the node information.
>>
>> But try_offline_node() called from acpi_processor_remove() never clears
>> the node information. For disabling cpu_present_bits, acpi_unmap_lsapic()
>> need be called. But acpi_unmap_lsapic() is called after try_offline_node()
>> runs. So when try_offline_node() runs, the cpu's cpu_present_bits is always
>> set.
>>
>> This patch moves try_offline_node() after acpi_unmap_lsapic().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> The change looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Thanks, Toshi!
> BTW, do you know why try_offline_node() has to use stop_machine()?
I don't know the reason.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
> Thanks,
> -Toshi
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-07 3:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-06 10:11 [PATCH] ACPI, cpu hotplug: move try_offline_node() after acpi_unmap_lsapic() Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-08-06 10:11 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-08-06 16:56 ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-07 3:23 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu [this message]
2013-08-07 3:23 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-08-09 7:28 ` Tang Chen
2013-08-09 22:16 ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-09 23:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-10 2:11 ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-11 20:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-12 20:08 ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-13 0:39 ` [PATCH] driver core / cpu: Check if NUMA node is valid before bringing CPU up Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-13 0:37 ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-09 2:43 ` [PATCH] ACPI, cpu hotplug: move try_offline_node() after acpi_unmap_lsapic() Gu Zheng
2013-08-09 5:53 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2013-08-09 5:53 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5201BDB9.8050301@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.